© Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
12 Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements (2017) 9, 11-28
434
Influence of gender in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction:
insight from the first French metaregistry
S. Manzo-Silberman (*) (1), F. Couturaud (2), S. Charpentier (3), V. Auf-
fret (4), C. El Khoury (5), H. Le Breton (4), L. Belle (6), S. Marliere (7),
M. Zeller (8), Y. Cottin (9), N. Danchin (10), T. Simon (11), F. Schiele
(12), M. Gilard (2)
(1) APHP-Hôpital Lariboisière, Cardiologie, Paris, France – (2) CHU
Brest, Medecine interne pneumologie, Brest, France – (3) CHU Rangueil,
Urgences, Toulouse, France – (4) CHU Brest, Cardiologie, Brest,
France – (5) CHU Rennes, Cardiologie, Rennes, France – (6) CHU Dijon,
Cardiologie, Dijon, France – (7) Hôpital Lucien Hussel, Urgences,
Vienne, France – (8) CHU Annecy, Cardiologie, Annecy, France –
(9) CHU Grenoble, Cardiologie, Grenoble, France – (10) Université de
Bourgogne, Laboratoire de physiopathologie et pharmacologie, Dijon,
France – (11) Université de Bourgogne, Inserm U866, Dijon, France –
(12) CHU Dijon, Hôpital Bocage, Cardiologie, Dijon, France –
(13) APHP-Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), Paris, France
– (14) Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Pharmacologie, Paris, France –
(15) APHP-Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou (HEGP), Cardiologie,
Paris, France – (16) CHU Besançon, Cardiologie, Besançon, France
*Corresponding author: stephanesilberman@hotmail.com
Background Women show greater mortality after acute myocardial infarc-
tion, particularly in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
although the gender effect seems to diminish after control for age and comor-
bidities.
Purpose To investigate whether gender affects time management and
impacts in-hospital mortality.
Methods A patient-level pooled analysis of French MI registry data from
different regions from January 2005 to December 2012. Patients presenting
acute STEMI, with call delay <12 hours from symptom onset, and primary
contact with an emergency department with percutaneous coronary interven-
tion facility or mobile intensive care unit were included. Primary study out-
comes were STEMI delays: patient delay, system delay and total ischemic
time. Secondary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality.
Results 16,733 patients were included with 4,021 females. Women less
often called an emergency dispatch center. 18.3% of women and 11.6% of
men (p<0.001) received no reperfusion. Patient delay was longer in women
even after adjustment with adjusted mean difference of 14.4 min (p<0.001);
system delay did not differ (adjusted mean: 287 vs. 281 min, p=0.25). In-hos-
pital death concerned 3 times more females than males. This disadvantage per-
sisted strongly adjusting for age, therapeutic strategy and even delay.
Conclusions This overview of 16,733 real-life consecutive STEMI patients
in prospective registries over an extensive period strongly indicates gender-
related discrepancies, highlighting clinically relevant delays in seeking med-
ical attention. However, higher in-hospital mortality was not totally explained
by clinical characteristics or delays. Dedicated studies of specific mechanisms
underlying this female disadvantage are mandatory to reduce this gender gap.
The authors hereby declare no conflict of interest
458
The success of thrombectomy does not prevent angiographically
visible distal embolization in STEMI patients treated by primary per-
cutaneous coronary intervention and thrombectomy
V. Yameogo, K. Stamboul*, C. Richard, A. Gudjoncik, J. Hamblin,
P. Buffet, I. L’huillier, L. Lorgis, Y. Cottin
CHU Dijon, Hôpital Bocage, Cardiologie, Dijon, France
*Corresponding author: stamboulk@gmail.com
Distal embolization during p-PCI and thrombectomy to treat STEMI is associ-
ated with poor prognosis. The aims of our study were to determinate angiographic
predictors of angiographically visible distal embolization (AVDE) during STEMI
treated by p-PCI with thrombectomy and check if the success of thrombectomy
prevents AVDE in STEMI. 346 consecutive patients admitted for STEMI who
underwent p-PCI and thrombectomy were included. Clinical, angiographic and
therapeutic characteristics were assessed for each patient. AVDE was defined as a
distal filling defect with an abrupt “cut-off” in one of the peripheral coronary
branches of the infarct related artery, distal to the angioplasty site. Patients were
divided into 2 groups: presence of AVDE (AVDE+=59 patients) and absence of
AVDE (AVDE-=287 patients). Comparing the 2 groups, age > 60 years was more
important in AVDE+ (65.57 vs.50%; p=0.014) as was female gender (32.78 vs.
20.13%; p=0,027) and right coronary lesion (55.73 vs. 34.37%; p=0.001); while
smoking was more frequent in AVDE- (62.84 vs. 44.26%; p=0.014) as was left
descending coronary artery lesion (50 vs. 34.42%; p=0.004). After multivariate
analysis, the infarct related right coronary artery (OR [95% CI]: 2.48 (1.36-4.52);
p=0.003) and culprit coronary diameter >3mm (OR [95% CI]: 1.90 (1.01-3.56);
p=0.048) were independent factors associated with AVDE during p-PCI with
thrombectomy for STEMI. Success of thrombectomy and syntax score were not
associated with AVDE occurrence. This study highlighted that AVDE compli-
cating p-PCI with thrombectomy in STEMI is frequent (17%) and the success of
thrombectomy don’t prevent AVDE. Two angiographic independent AVDE pre-
dictors were identified: right coronary artery lesion and culprit coronary artery
diameter >3mm. These data call into question the definition of success of throm-
bectomy and the need for specific studies on the right coronary artery.
The authors hereby declare no conflict of interest
256
Analysis of mortality rate in patients with ST-segment elevation myo-
cardial infarction: the SCALIM registry
E. Martins (2), J. Magne (*) (2), V. Pradelle (2), G. Faugeras (3), D. Caill-
loce (2), D. Mohty (2), E. Fleurant (1), H. Karam (2), PB. Petitcolin (3),
P. Virot (2), V. Aboyans (2)
(1) CH Brive, Cardiologie, Brive, France – (2) CHU Limoges, Cardiolo-
gie, Limoges, France – (3) Epsilim, Limoges, France
*Corresponding author: jul.magne@yahoo.fr
Background SCALIM, a registry of ST-segment elevation myocardial
infarction (STEMI) managed within the first 24 hours in Limousin, reports
higher mortality rate than other French registries.
Aims To determine whether this difference is due to inclusion criteria and
demographic characteristics, in particular as compared to the national FAST-
MI 2010 registry.
Methods Inclusion criteria of other registries were applied to SCALIM
population in order to compare mortality rates. Risk factors for mortality were
obtained by multivariate analysis in SCALIM, and these risk factors rates
were compared with other registries.
Results From 06/2011 to 01/2015, 1501 patients were included in
SCALIM. One-month mortality rate was 8.8%. The use of FAST-MI criteria
showed a lower one-month mortality rate (6.4% vs originally 8.8% in
SCALIM, p=0.016). Age (OR=1.045, IC 95%=[1.025–1.065]; p<0.001) and
no-reperfusion therapy within 12 hours (OR=4.395, IC 95%=[1.131–17.082],
p<0.001] were independent risk factors for mortality in SCALIM. Mean age
(65 vs 63.3 years, p<0.001) was higher in SCALIM than in FAST-MI and
reperfusion therapy was more frequently used (84.2 vs 74.7%, p<0.001).
Conclusion Higher mortality rate in SCALIM is in part due to differences
of inclusion criteria. Effort should be made to harmonize these criteria and
facilitate comparison between registries. Demographic data seem to explain
another part of difference in mortality rate in FAST-MI 2010, especially age.
The authors hereby declare no conflict of interest
366
Drift evaluation after FFR measurements
C. Pouillot (1), K. Bougrini (1), R. Vi Fane (1), G. Rambaud (1), J. Glase-
napp (1), C. Geyer (1), J. Adjedj (*) (2)
(1) Clinique Sainte Clotilde, Sainte Clotilde, La Réunion, France –
(2) APHP-Hôpital Cochin, Cardiologie, Paris, France
*Corresponding author: julienadjedj@hotmail.com
Aims Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) corresponds to the coronary flow
ratio in maximal hyperemia with and without coronary stenosis (Pd/Pa).
FFR is an accurate test compared to other tests in cardiology with a difference