0
E-Collaboration within Blogging Communities
of Practice
Vanessa Paz Dennen
Florida State University, USA
Tatyana G. Pashnyak
Florida State University, USA
Copyright © 2008, IGI Global, distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.
IntroductIon
The act of blogging is not an inherently social or com-
munity-oriented one, but increasingly blogs have been
used both as a forum for sharing information with and
interacting with others and as a huge repository of
information and opinions to be collected, organized,
and shared. New blogs are being created at a very
quick rate; Technorati, a blog-indexing company,
estimates that they are tracking over 70 million blogs
as of February, 2007, a number that is continuously
growing (Technorati, 2007). Combined with current
trends toward online social networking and learning
communities, it is not surprising that blogs have been
used to support e-collaboration.
Blogging communities have developed in two ways.
First, through this proliferation of blogs, individuals
with like interests have found each other and built online
connections. Second, people with real-life connections
have realized the potential of blogging technology to
facilitate collaboration and have purposefully created
blogs to support their efforts. This article provides an
overview of how blogging communities of practice
are defned, have developed, and have come to use the
tools for e-collaboration.
Background
The Internet was developed in part to bring together
groups of people who are separated by time and space,
and the concept of people working together in virtual
communities stretches back to the pre-Web days of
this technology (Rheingold, 2000). Blogging is an
act that can be done individually, but has come to be
done collaboratively by many people over the years.
It is essentially involves writing and publishing brief
posts to a Web page in reverse chronological order.
The defnition of blog contains no requirement of an
external audience, interactants, or discourse; a blog
could be a personal diary, a log of work, or a collection
or personal links intended for the authors’ eyes only.
That blogging became a community-oriented activity in
some contexts is perhaps more indicative of a desire for
technology-mediated communication than of anything
inherent in the technology itself, which did not extend
beyond basic Web-page creation.
Communities, in the general sense, may be cultural,
geographical, or based on interest. An online community
might be any of these three, but defning community
can prove a big challenging. The word community
often is used rather casually with reference to people
communicating via the Web. Any collection of people
who might communicate online has come to be called a
virtual community, and corporate entities have used the
concept of online community as a marketing strategy.
However, online community is based on more than
just the ability to communicate with others, reading the
same blog or having signed up for the same bulletin
board or email list. Just because people read the same
online newspaper, for example, does not make them
a community; individual readers likely do not know
of each other’s identity or presence, nor do they gain
anything from it.
A true community requires that additional criteria
be met, and evidence of community can be found
in many forms. Kling and Courtwright (2003) have
criticized overly general use of the term community,
suggesting that a true community extends beyond mere
ability to communicate with others. They highlight
interpersonal elements such as a developing sense of
trust among participants and the resulting willingness
to take risks as indicators of community. Josefsson
(2005) provides a framework of social dynamics to
be explored, with community being demonstrated
through the interrelationship of forms of expression,