Prospective evaluation of clinical and radiologic factors predicting return to activity within 6 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair Philippe Collin, MD a , Arifaizad Abdullah, MD, PhD b , Omar Kherad, MD, MPH c , Solenn Gain, PT a , Patrick J. Denard, MD d,e , Alexandre L € adermann, MD f,g,h, * a Saint-Gr egoire Private Hospital Center, Saint-Gr egoire, France b Department of Orthopaedics, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia c La Tour Hospital, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Geneva, Meyrin, Switzerland d Southern Oregon Orthopedics, Medford, Oregon, USA e Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA f Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Meyrin, Switzerland g Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland h Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland Background: This study aimed to report the outcome of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and to determine the factors associated with return to work and activity. Materials: Three hundred sixty-five patients who underwent ARCR were prospectively evaluated. The cohort was divided into 2 groups based on clinical results at 6 months. Group A consisted of patients who were considered to have a satisfactory outcome based on return to their previous professional or spare-time activities. Group B consisted of patients with an unsatisfactory outcome based on a lack of re- turn to normal work or activities. Results: Of the patients, 305 had a satisfactory outcome (group A) and 60 were categorized as having an unsatisfactory outcome (group B). On multivariate analysis, preoperative factors associated with group B included female gender and heavy manual labor. Postoperative bursitis on ultrasound at 6 months was asso- ciated with being in group B. Lack of tendon healing was not associated with group B. However, if a pa- tient without healing had persistent pain at 6 months, the pain persisted at 9 months. Conclusion: ARCR is an effective procedure that leads to significant improvement in pain, function, and tendon healing in most cases. However, in 1 of 5 cases, patients were unable to resume normal activity at 6 months postoperatively. Persistent limitation at 6 months was associated with female gender, heavy manual workers, and the presence of postoperative persistent bursitis. Ethical committee approval was received from Association des M edecins du Canton de Gen eve et Soci et eM edicale; protocol 12-26; November 12, 2012. *Reprint requests: Alexandre L€ adermann, MD, Division of Orthopae- dics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Avenue J.-D. Maillard 3, CH- 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland. E-mail address: alexandre.laedermann@gmail.com (A. L€ adermann). J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2014) -, 1-7 www.elsevier.com/locate/ymse 1058-2746/$ - see front matter Ó 2014 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.014