Prospective evaluation of clinical and radiologic factors predicting return to activity within 6 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair Philippe Collin, MD a , Arifaizad Abdullah, MD, PhD b , Omar Kherad, MD, MPH c , Solenn Gain, PT a , Patrick J. Denard, MD d,e , Alexandre L adermann, MD f,g,h, * a Saint-Gregoire Private Hospital Center, Saint-Gregoire, France b Department of Orthopaedics, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia c La Tour Hospital, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Geneva, Meyrin, Switzerland d Southern Oregon Orthopedics, Medford, Oregon, USA e Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA f Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Meyrin, Switzerland g Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland h Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland Background: This study aimed to report the outcome of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and to determine the factors associated with return to work and activity. Materials: Three hundred sixty-five patients who underwent ARCR were prospectively evaluated. The cohort was divided into 2 groups based on clinical results at 6 months. Group A consisted of patients who were considered to have a satisfactory outcome based on return to their previous professional or spare-time activities. Group B consisted of patients with an unsatisfactory outcome based on a lack of re- turn to normal work or activities. Results: Of the patients, 305 had a satisfactory outcome (group A) and 60 were categorized as having an unsatisfactory outcome (group B). On multivariate analysis, preoperative factors associated with group B included female gender and heavy manual labor. Postoperative bursitis on ultrasound at 6 months was asso- ciated with being in group B. Lack of tendon healing was not associated with group B. However, if a pa- tient without healing had persistent pain at 6 months, the pain persisted at 9 months. Conclusion: ARCR is an effective procedure that leads to significant improvement in pain, function, and tendon healing in most cases. However, in 1 of 5 cases, patients were unable to resume normal activity at 6 months postoperatively. Persistent limitation at 6 months was associated with female gender, heavy manual workers, and the presence of postoperative persistent bursitis. Ethical committee approval was received from Association des Medecins du Canton de Geneve et SocieteMedicale; protocol 12-26; November 12, 2012. *Reprint requests: Alexandre Ladermann, MD, Division of Orthopae- dics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Avenue J.-D. Maillard 3, CH- 1217 Meyrin, Switzerland. E-mail address: alexandre.laedermann@gmail.com (A. Ladermann). J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2014) -, 1-7 www.elsevier.com/locate/ymse 1058-2746/$ - see front matter Ó 2014 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.08.014