U H P H 2 0 1 6 I c o n s : T h e M a k i n g , M e a n i n g a n d U n d o i n g o f U r b a n I c o n s a n d I c o n i c C i t i e s | 505 Urban Parks, Urban I cons? The case of Bicentennial Park in Sydney Catherine Evans Faculty of the Built Environment, UNSW cb.evans@unsw.edu.au This paper explores the question of how urban parks function as urban icons. It examines Bicentennial Park in Homebush Bay, 12 km west of the Sydney Central Business District (CBD) as a case study. Bicentennial Park was planned and designed between 1983 and 1988, a time when Australia, and its cities in particular, grappled with tensions between celebrating achievements of two hundred years of European settlement and redressing the cultural and ecological harm wrought by those achievements. The research focuses on a review of material related to the design and promotion of the park, and early reviews of the park. The discussion explores the influence of specific ideas about the city and ecology on the transformations of use, materiality, and physical form of the land that became Bicentennial Park. Findings reveal that Bicentennial Park at Homebush Bay was conceived as an awkwardly scripted design, which in turn reflects a convergence of urban planning initiatives, intensifying environmental awareness and ideological tensions within the then nascent Australian- based profession of landscape architecture. The findings also reveal that, in this case, aesthetic innovation is not the basis of iconicity; more significant are the ways in which the form and materiality of a park design conveys shifts in ideas about the city and its relationship to ‘nature,’ and for landscape architecture, ways of practicing design. Key Words: urban parks; urban icons; Bicentennial Park; Australian landscape architecture Introduction “Linear parks are urban icons!” A clear enough pronouncement by a delegate at the 2015 Australian Institute of Landscape Architects conference, but on reflection, I realised that it was more problematic than it seemed. While it is true that the particular linear parks this delegate referred to,the High Line in New York City and the Goods Line in Sydney, quickly have gained iconic status, not all parks become icons, or iconic. Why not? How does any park become iconic, and why? Why does it matter that parks become iconic at all? In part, it matters because parks are more than design projects: they are cultural expressions, specific to time and place. Great urban parks –think Central Park, think High Line—can be considered iconic because their designs capture a social and