Freestanding LiFe
0.2
Mn
0.8
PO
4
/rGO nanocomposites as high energy
density fast charging cathodes for lithium-ion batteries
F. Zoller
a, b
, D. B
€
ohm
a, c
, J. Luxa
d
, M. D
€
oblinger
c
, Z. Sofer
d
, D. Semenenko
e
, T. Bein
c
,
D. Fattakhova-Rohlfing
a, b, e, *
a
Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute of Energy and Climate Research (IEK-1): Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52425
Jülich, Germany
b
Faculty of Engineering and Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CENIDE), Universit€ at Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstraße 1, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
c
Department of Chemistry and Center for NanoScience (CeNS), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit€ at München (LMU Munich), Butenandtstrasse 5-13 (E), 81377
Munich, Germany
d
Department of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technick a 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic
e
Laboratory of Physical and Chemical Processes in Post Li-ion Batteries, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Institutsky Lane 9, Moscow District,
141700 Dolgoprudny, Russia
article info
Article history:
Received 12 March 2020
Received in revised form
8 April 2020
Accepted 9 April 2020
Available online xxx
Keywords:
Cathode materials
Lithium manganese phosphate
Freestanding electrodes
Nanoparticles
abstract
Freestanding electrodes for lithium ion batteries are considered as a promising option to increase the
total gravimetric energy density of the cells due to a decreased weight of electrochemically inactive
materials. We report a simple procedure for the fabrication of freestanding LiFe
0.2
Mn
0.8
PO
4
(LFMP)/rGO
electrodes with a very high loading of active material of 83 wt%, high total loading of up to 8 mg cm
2
,
high energy density, excellent cycling stability and at the same time very fast charging rate, with a total
performance significantly exceeding the values reported in the literature. The keys to the improved
electrode performance are optimization of LFMP nanoparticles via nanoscaling and doping; the use of
graphene oxide (GO) with its high concentration of surface functional groups favoring the adhesion of
high amounts of LFMP nanoparticles, and freeze-casting of the GO-based nanocomposites to prevent the
morphology collapse and provide a unique fluffy open microstructure of the freestanding electrodes. The
rate and the cycling performance of the obtained freestanding electrodes are superior compared to their
Al-foil coated equivalents, especially when calculated for the entire weight of the electrode, due to the
extremely reduced content of electrochemically inactive material (17 wt% of electrochemically inactive
material in case of the freestanding compared to 90 wt% for the Al-foil based electrode), resulting in 120
mAh g
1
electrode
in contrast to 10 mAh g
1
electrode
at 0.2 C. The electrochemical performance of the
freestanding LFMP/rGO electrodes is also considerably better than the values reported in literature for
freestanding LFMP and LMP composites, and can even keep up with those of LFP-based analogues. The
freestanding LFMP/rGO reported in this work is additionally attractive due to its high gravimetric energy
density (604 Wh kg
1
LFMP
at 0.2C). The obtained results demonstrate the advantage of freestanding
LiFe
0.2
Mn
0.8
PO
4
/rGO electrodes and their great potential for applications in lithium ion batteries.
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Olivine-structured lithium transition-metal phosphates LiMPO
4
(M ¼ Fe, Mn, Co, Ni) attract significant interest as cathode materials
in Li-ion batteries (LIBs) due to their high theoretical specific ca-
pacities of around 170 mAh g
1
, good chemical and thermal sta-
bility, safety and low cost. Particularly, LiFePO
4
(LFP) has been
already successfully commercialized [1e3]. Nevertheless, LFP has a
rather low operating potential of 3.45 V vs. Li/Li
þ
and a corre-
sponding low energy density (568 Wh kg
1
), which hampers its
application in high power and/or high energy devices [1]. Mn, Co or
Ni based analogues gain increasing attention as promising alter-
natives having a similar theoretical specific capacity but higher
energy densities of 701 Wh kg
1
, 802 Wh kg
1
and 867 Wh kg
1
for
* Corresponding author. Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute of Energy
and Climate Research (IEK-1): Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wilhelm-Joh-
nen-Straße, 52425 Jülich, Germany.
E-mail address: d.fattakhova@fz-juelich.de (D. Fattakhova-Rohlfing).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Materials Today Energy
journal homepage: www.journals.elsevier.com/materials-today-energy/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2020.100416
2468-6069/© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Materials Today Energy 16 (2020) 100416