A critical review of the application of environmental scenario exercises Josh Wodak a,c [164_TD$DIFF] , Timothy Neale b,c, * [165_TD$DIFF]a University of New South Wales, Paddington, NSW 2021, Australia b Western Sydney University, [166_TD$DIFF]Institute for Culture and Society, Penrith, NSW, Australia c Bushfire & Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre, [168_TD$DIFF]Melbourne, VIC, Australia ARTICLE INFO Article history: Received 15 April 2015 Received in revised form 22 September 2015 Accepted 22 September 2015 Available online 3 October 2015 Keywords: Scenario exercises Environmental scenarios Natural hazards Literature review ABSTRACT Scenario exercises have become instrumental across multiple fields, from their original usage in business [170_TD$DIFF]and military planning, to being ubiquitous in environmental planning and policy formation. This article critically reviews whether there are explicit and imminent divisions between how scenario exercises are used and discussed, with particular focus on the literature of qualitative scenarios concerning environmental challenges. The authors interrogate what scenario exercises are in actual practice, in the context of what they are used for and how they are designed, before then considering the criteria for determining ‘success’ for a scenario exercise. The particular focus of the literature analysed is in the emergence of the discipline of ‘environmental scenarios’, being scenarios concerned with 21st Century environmental challenges such as the influence of climate change on the notion of natural hazards. ã 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Scenario exercises have become instrumental across multiple fields, from their original usage in business and military planning ([171_TD$DIFF]Lakoff, 2007), to being ubiquitous in environmental planning and policy formation. This article critically reviews whether there are explicit and imminent divisions between how scenario exercises are used and discussed, with particular focus on the literature of qualitative scenarios concerning environmental challenges. The authors question what scenario exercises are in actual practice, in the context of what they are used for and how they are designed, before then considering the criteria for determining ‘success’ for a scenario exercise. The particular focus of the literature analysed is in the emergence of the discipline of ‘environmental scenarios’, being scenarios concerned with 21st century environmental challenges such as the influence of climate change on the occurrence and consequences of natural hazard events. The term ‘scenario’ has particular properties in the context of ‘environmental scenarios’, although the core criteria retain the earlier definitions of ‘scenario’ [172_TD$DIFF]found in the broader literature (Börjeson, Höjer, Dreborg, Ekvall, & Finnveden, 2006; Bradfield, Wright, Burt, Cairns, & van der Heijden, 2005). The properties particular to ‘environmental scenarios’ have been most comprehensively determined by major multi-year, multi-governmental international projects about environmental challenges, as these organisations have established the main properties in order to conduct the scenario exercises for their projects. The United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) 3rd Global Environmental Outlook (GEO-3), for example, defines scenarios as ‘descriptions of journeys to possible futures’ which ‘reflect different assumptions about how current * Corresponding author. E-mail address: t.neale@westernsydney.edu.au (T. Neale). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.09.002 0016-3287/ ã 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Futures 73 (2015) 176–186 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Futures journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/futures