CASE REPORT
Colostomy-Sparing Fecal Diversion in a Child After Extensive
Perianal Trauma
Nathaniel E. Uecker, MD, Patrick J. O’Neill, PhD, MD, FACS, Salvatore C. Lettieri, MD, FACS,
Tammy R. Kopelman, MD, FACS, Kevin N. Foster, MD, MBA, FACS, Marc R. Matthews, MD, FACS,
and Daniel M. Caruso, MD, FACS
U
ncomplicated and expeditious regional wound healing
after anorectal, perianal, and perineal trauma can be
challenging. Although most wounds in this area will heal
with aggressive local dressing care, historical practice had
dictated the need for surgical fecal diversion (i.e., colos-
tomy) in patients who fail conservative measures or in
those that subjectively have extensive, initial soft tissue
disease. A recent study in adult burn and debilitated
patients has demonstrated regional wound care successes
with the use of temporary, nonsurgical fecal diversion (i.e.,
bowel management systems [BMS]
1
). However, because
of the lack of evidence for nonsurgical diversion tech-
niques in children, colostomy remains standard despite the
need for future surgery and all the associated physical,
psychologic, and emotional liabilities. We report an exam-
ple of BMS use (i.e., nonsurgical fecal diversion) in a
pediatric patient with extensive back, buttock, and thigh
trauma. This new, nonsurgical methodology permitted suc-
cessful clinical outcome without colostomy placement and
its related morbidities in a child.
Case Presentation
A helmeted 13-year-old boy (54 kg) was riding a
bicycle when he was struck by and pulled under a full-
sized city bus. The bus dragged him along the asphalt 25
feet after impact. After a prolonged extrication, he was
transported to our level I Adult and Pediatric Trauma
Center. On admission, he was tachycardic (110 beats per
minute) but had otherwise normal vital signs. He had a
nonfocal primary survey and a visibly deformed right
femur with an intact lower leg and foot. After completion
of the secondary survey, the patient underwent full diag-
nostic imaging which revealed pubic rami, sacral, and iliac
crest fractures along with closed right tibial and left
humeral fractures. A urethral injury was noted by cysto-
gram for which a suprapubic cystostomy tube was placed.
No other cranial, cervical, thoracic, abdominal, or pelvic
internal injuries were diagnosed.
A substantial degloving injury was noted to the
patient’s posterior torso, bilateral posterolateral thighs,
and buttocks approximating 25% total body surface area.
The overlying skin was devitalized, minimally bleeding,
and grossly contaminated. The patient was taken to the
operating room that day for sharp debridement, wound
lavage, and orthopedic reduction of the extremity fractures
(Fig. 1).
Postoperatively, the patient received our standard Burn
Center tube feeding diet with a goal intake of 2.0 –3.0 g
protein/kg and 50 –55 kcal/kg each day. A stool softener was
added to lessen the impact of narcotic-induced constipation
often seen in this patient population with a goal of one bowel
movement daily or every other day. Standard oral doses of
vitamin C, vitamin A, and zinc were also supplemented.
During the next 2 weeks, the patient returned to the
operating room multiple times for debridement and pulse
lavage irrigation of the slowly healing wounds as well as
completion of the remaining orthopedic procedures. Initial
wound care included multiple daily dressing changes. It
was our belief that with such aggressive, local wound care,
we might be able to avoid a colostomy and its potential
morbidity in this child. Once stooling began, external
reservoir systems as well as negative pressure dressings
were used in an attempt to keep the surrounding tissue free
from fecal contamination. Although largely free of ne-
crotic or devitalized tissue by this time, complete wound
healing was jeopardized by the proximity to the patient’s
anus and the almost daily regional soilage because of
stooling despite these labor- and time-intensive efforts
(Fig. 2). By 3 weeks postinjury, it was clear that fecal
diversion would be necessary to avoid wound infection and
subsequent graft failure.
Traditional surgical methods for fecal diversion were
discussed at length with the family who were justifiably
concerned over the potential adverse sequelae of this option
in their child. The family then consented to the off-label use
of the BMS product (ActiFlo Indwelling Bowel Catheter,
Submitted for publication June 11, 2007.
Accepted for publication August 15, 2007.
Copyright © 2010 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
From the Division of Burns, Trauma Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Mari-
copa Medical Center and the Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix, Arizona; and
Division of Plastic Surgery, Maricopa Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
Presented at the 59th Annual Southwestern Surgical Congress Meeting, Rancho
Mirage, CA, March 25–28, 2007.
Address for reprints: Patrick J. O’Neill, PhD, MD, FACS, Division of Burns,
Trauma Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Mari-
copa Medical Center, 2601 East Roosevelt, Phoenix, AZ 85008; email:
patrick_oneill@dmgaz.org.
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181588811
The Journal of TRAUMA
®
Injury, Infection, and Critical Care • Volume 68, Number 2, February 2010 E49