Law Development Journal ISSN : 2747-2604 Volume 3 Issue 1, March 2021, (44 – 51) The Element of Deliberate Action in a Series of Actions on PRONA Program's Corruption Crime (Antonius Agung Ariyanto) 44 The Element of Deliberate Action in a Series of Actions on PRONA Program's Corruption Crime Antonius Agung Ariyanto*) and Ira Alia Maerani**) *) Student of Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, Indonesia, E-mail: agungariyanto1974.aa@gmail.com **) Faculty of Law Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Abstract. The purpose of this research is to analyze construction law panel of judges in deciding cases of corruption, qualifying extortion in the PRONA program. The research approach method used is a qualitative normative juridical approach. The legal construction built by the Panel of Judges in criminal cases of extortion qualification of corruption fulfills the provisions in Criminal Law, namely the Principles of Legality and culpability. The defendant was proven to have violated the law in the provisions charged by the public prosecutor, namely Act No. 31 of 1999 Jo Act No. 20 of 2001 and Article 55 paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code. The conclusion of this research is that the defendant was proven intentionally, at least knowing it as an intentional element, designing the Prona committee, determining Prona's fees, and issuing a “threat” letter to the applicant which should be free (with certain conditions). According to the Panel of Judges, such legal facts are sufficient to prove that the defendant was deliberately involved in the criminal act of corruption. It is recommended that in dealing with corruption cases with the same motive, in the future, the public prosecutor is more courageous in giving a single indictment. So that from the start, I was sure of the charges given, especially from the collection of materials and information through a catch operation. Keywords: Legal Construction; Corruption; Extortion. 1. Introduction Corruption, according to the United Nation Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), is formulated as a threat to the security and stability of society, damages democratic values and institutions, destroys moral values and justice, endangers sustainable development and the 'rule of law' and threatens stability political. 1 This means that corruption is an extra ordinary crime, which requires extraordinary efforts to eradicate it. In addition, it is necessary to implement a policy to combat corruption through an integral (integrated) and comprehensive approach. Hulman also argued corruption is an act that can cause losses to many parties and can even affect the existence and development of progress and the welfare of the people of a country. 2 People, as victims of corruption (although sometimes unwittingly), yearn for sustainable development towards prosperity that can be felt real in the beats of life. However, corruption was increasingly prevalent in the post-New Order era. The various modus operandi which are 1 Arief, Barda Nawawi. Kebijakan Reformulasi Ancaman Pidana Mati Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, MMH, Jilid 42, January 1, 2013. p.1. 2 Siregar, Hulman . Rumusan Pidana Dan Pemidanaan Tindak pidana Korupsi Yang Merugikan Keuangan Negara Serta Permasalaan Dalam Penerapannya, Jurnal Daulat Hukum Volume 1 No. 1 March 2018, p. 126.