PHRASING HOMER:ACOGNITIVE-LINGUISTIC APPROACH TO
HOMERIC VERSIFICATION
MARK JANSE
DEPARTMENT OF LINGUISTICS,GHENT UNIVERSITY,BELGIUM;
CENTER FOR HELLENIC STUDIES,HARVARD UNIVERSITY, USA
Anyone interested in the colometry or “inner metrics” of the Homeric hexameter
is confronted with a wide variety of different approaches, favouring two-, three-
or four-colon verses or any combination of these. This article builds on Egbert
Bakker’s interpretation of Homeric discourse as a succession of intonation /
information units (IUs). Its aim is to provide more secure cognitive-linguistic
criteria for determining caesura positions and the resulting cola / IUs.
Keywords: Homer; epic; hexameter; caesura; colometry; versification;
discourse; information structure; information units; intonation units;
word order
. Introduction
Anyone interested in the colometry or “inner metrics” of the Homeric
hexameter is bound on a long and frustrating quest. It will be long
because so much has been written about the divisions of Homeric verse
and what exactly such divisions represent. It will be frustrating because
the information found in the numerous handbooks and commentaries
is often conflicting or even contradictory. Particularly frustrating is the
question of where to place the caesura(e) and whether this should be
done with or without regard to meaning.
Based on twenty-five years of experience in teaching courses on
Homeric language and meter at Ghent University and the University
of Amsterdam and in guest lectures and seminars on Homeric versifica-
tion at numerous universities in Europe and North America, the
present article discusses the linguistic criteria that can be used to deter-
mine caesura positions within the hexameter and consequently also the
shape and content of the resulting cola, building on earlier work by
Bakker (, a, b, ) and Janse (, , ,
© Symbolae Osloenses
Symbolae Osloenses,
Vol. , No. , –, https://doi.org/./..