A Gas-Phase Study of the Ionic Alkylation of
Benzocycloalkenes
Barbara Chiavarino, Maria Elisa Crestoni, and
Simonetta Fornarini*
Dipartimento di Studi di Chimica e
Tecnologia delle Sostanze Biologicamente AttiVe
UniVersita ` di Roma “La Sapienza”
P.le A. Moro 5, I-00185 Roma, Italy
ReceiVed January 18, 2000
Since the early finding by Mills and Nixon of enhanced
positional selectivities in the bromination of indan and tetralin
derivatives,
1
the properties of benzocycloalkenes have been the
subject of considerable interest. A small fused carbocyclic ring
was found to direct the electrophilic substitution of the benzene
nucleus to the -position.
1,2
The effect (MN effect) was ascribed
to partial π-electron localization resulting from the fusion of an
angular strained ring.
3
Accordingly, the bond common to both
rings was proposed to have a reinforced single-bond character.
This concept has stimulated extensive experimental
4
and theoreti-
cal
5
investigations. Their conclusions were found either to support
the manifestation of the MN effect
6
or to cast doubts on its
existence.
7
The major focus of recent research has addressed the
design and the structural elucidation of molecular frameworks
where a mono-, bis-, or tris-annelated benzene nucleus was
expected to display aromatic bond alternation.
8
Thus, in recent
investigations the issue of the effect of a small ring on the
structural features of a fused aromatic ring has superseded the
original interest on the reactivity of the benzene nucleus. We turn
to this latter point with the present report, although using a quite
different approach.
It may be noted that the operation of the MN effect has been
discussed in relation to either positional selectivities in electro-
philic aromatic substitution reactions in solution or structural
analysis in a crystal packing. In both cases there may be a major
role played by the environment in affecting intrinsic molecular
properties. In a series of studies we have obtained valuable insights
into the reactivity of aromatic compounds toward ionic electro-
philes by utilizing a radiolytic technique for the investigation of
gaseous systems at atmospheric pressure.
9
In this environment,
the lack of solvents, catalysts and counterions allows one to unveil
the intrinsic features of the reaction under scrutiny by experimental
means relying on the characterization of the neutral end products.
By this methodology the reactivity of a benchmark substrate for
the MN effect, benzocyclobutene (1), was studied in relation to
the higher homologues, 2, 3, and 4, using simple aromatic
compounds, such as o-xylene (5) and mesitylene (6), as reference
substrates.
10
Me
2
Cl
+
and Me
3
C
+
were chosen as model reagents, both ions
being known to promote an electrophilic aromatic substitution
reaction in the gas phase. Me
2
Cl
+
, from the radiation induced
ionization of MeCl and subsequent ion-molecule reactions,
behaves as a selective methylating agent where the displacement
of MeCl by the aromatic π system involves significant activation
energies.
11
Me
3
C
+
, from the ionization/fragmentation of isobutane,
is a mild electrophile, reacting as a Lewis acid with aromatic
compounds.
12
The positional selectivity for the electrophilic
substitution by Me
3
C
+
is known to be highly sensitive to steric
effects, inhibiting, to a large extent, the attack at a ring carbon
that is ortho to a methyl group. The yields of the substitution
products from the selected substrates are summarized in Table 1,
where R and denote the site of the entered alkyl group (Me or
Me
3
C) on the aromatic ring with respect to the cyclic alkyl
substituent in the substitution products. The formation of the
alkylation products is ascribed to a stepwise reaction pattern
(1) Mills, W. H.; Nixon, I. G. J. Chem. Soc. 1930, 2510.
(2) Taylor, R. Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution; Wiley: New York, 1990.
(3) Maksic, Z. B.; Eckert-Maksic, M.; Mo, O.; Yanez, M. In Pauling’s
Legacy - Modern Modeling of the Chemical Bond; Maksic, Z. B., Orville-
Thomas, W. J. Eds.; Vol. 6 of the series Theoretical and Computational
Chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1999.
(4) (a) Jemmis, E. D.; Kiran, B. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 9006. (b) Rathore,
R.; Lindeman, S. V.; Kumar, A. S.; Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 6012. (c) Martinez, A.; Jimeno, M. L.; Elguero, J. New J. Chem. 1994,
18, 269. (d) Siegel, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1721. (e)
Anthony, I. J.; Wege, D. Aust. J. Chem. 1996, 49, 1263. (f) Gescheidt, G.;
Prinzbach, H.; Davies, A. G.; Herges, R. Acta Chem. Scand. 1997, 51, 174.
(g) Apeloig, Y.; Boese, R.; Halton, B.; Maulitz, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 10147 and references therein.
(5) (a) Stanger, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 8277. (b) Miller, I. J.
Aust. J. Chem. 1997, 50, 795. (c) Koch, W.; Eckert-Maksic, M.; Maksic, Z.
B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1993, 2195. (d) Mo, O.; Yanez, M.; Eckert-
Maksic, M.; Maksic, Z. B. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1638. (e) Maksic, Z. B.;
Eckert-Maksic, M.; Pfeifer, K.-H. J. Mol. Struct. 1993, 300, 445. (f) Hiberty,
P. C.; Danovich, D.; Shurki, A.; Shaik, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7760.
(g) Howard, S. T.; Krygowski, T. M.; Ciesielski, A.; Wisiorowski, M.
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 3533 and references therein.
(6) (a) Eckert-Maksic, M.; Maksic, Z. B.; Klessinger, M. Int. J. Quantum
Chem. 1994, 49, 383. (b) Eckert-Maksic, M.; Maksic, Z. B.; Klessinger, M.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 285.
(7) (a) Boese, R.; Bla ¨ser, D.; Billups, W. E.; Haley, M. M.; Maulitz, A.
H.; Mohler, D. L.; Vollhardt, K. P. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994,
33, 313. (b) Bu ¨rgi, H.-B.; Baldridge, K. K.; Hardcastle, K.; Frank, N. L.;
Gantzel, P.; Siegel, J. S.; Ziller, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34,
1454. (c) Apeloig, Y.; Arad, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 3241. (d)
Baldridge, K. K.; Siegel, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 9583.
(8) (a) Cossu, S.; De Lucchi, O.; Lucchini, V.; Valle, G.; Balci, M.; Dastan,
A.; Demirci, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 5319. (b) Cardullo, F.; Giuffrida,
D.; Kohnke, F. H.; Raymo, F. M.; Stoddard, J. F.; Williams, D. J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 339.
(9) (a) Cacace, F. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 215. (b) Fornarini, S.; Crestoni,
M. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 827. (c) Fornarini, S. Mass Spectrom. ReV.
1996, 15, 365.
(10) Gaseous samples of known composition were prepared in sealed 0.13-L
Pyrex vessels according to a well-established procedure. Typical components
were as follows: 600-650 Torr of a bulk gas (MeCl to form Me2Cl
+
, or
isobutane as the precursor of Me3C
+
), 10 Torr O2 (a radical scavenger), 0.5-2
Torr of the aromatic substrate(s). TEA (0.7-1.0 Torr) was added in all
experiments run in isobutane and in several experiments run in MeCl.
Irradiations were performed in a 220 Gammacell (Nuclear Canada Ltd.) at
the dose rate of ∼5 × 10
3
Gy h
-1
for 3 h in a thermostated device. The
radiolytic products were extracted from the vessel utilizing ethyl acetate as
the solvent by repeated freeze-thaw cycles and analyzed by GC-MS using
a Hewlett-Packard 5890 series II gas chromatograph in line with a quadrupole
mass spectrometer, HP 5989B. The capillary columns and gas-chromatographic
conditions were the following: (i) a 50-m long, 0.20-mm i.d. fused silica
capillary column, coated with a 0.5-µm cross-linked methylsilicone film (HP
PONA column), operated isothermally at 60 °C for 5 min and then heated at
the rate of 3 deg min
-1
to 120 °C and subsequently at 16 deg min
-1
to 240
°C.; (ii) a 60-m long, 0.20-mm i.d. bonded-phase capillary column, coated
with a 0.2-µm poly(ethylene glycol) film (Supelcowax 10M from Supelco
Co.), operated at 100 °C for 2 min and then heated at the rate of 5 deg min
-1
to 250 °C. MeCl, i-C4H10, and O2 were research grade gases from Matheson
Gas Products Inc. with a stated purity in excess of 99.95 mol %. 1 was obtained
from 2-(2′-bromophenyl)ethyl bromide according to (a) Brewer, P. D.; Tagat,
J.; Hergrueter, C. A.; Helquist, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 52, 4573 and (b)
Parham, W. E.; Jones, L. D.; Sayed, Y. A. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 1184.
Other compounds used as additives, as substrates or as reference compounds
for GC-MS analyses were obtained from commercial sources or prepared
according to established methods.
(11) Sen Sharma, D. K.; Kebarle, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 19.
(12) (a) Sen Sharma, D. K.; Ikuta, S.; Kebarle, P. Can. J. Chem. 1982, 60,
2325. (b) Stone, J. M.; Stone, J. A. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes
1991, 109, 247. (c) Crestoni, M. E.; Fornarini, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
116, 5873.
5397 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5397-5398
10.1021/ja000164f CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 05/18/2000