Vol.:(0123456789)
New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies (2019) 54:69–97
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-019-00133-4
1 3
ARTICLE
How Do New Zealand Teachers Assess Children’s Oral
Language and Literacy Skills at School Entry?
Tracy A. Cameron
1
· Jane L. D. Carroll
1
· Mele Taumoepeau
1
·
Elizabeth Schaughency
1
Received: 30 May 2018 / Accepted: 6 March 2019 / Published online: 13 March 2019
© New Zealand Association for Research in Education 2019
Abstract
Teachers of year 0/1 students in English-medium schools in New Zealand (1896
schools) were invited to participate in a survey focussed on assessment of new
entrant children’s oral language and emergent literacy skills, with an estimated 21%
response rate (N = 745). Teachers indicated using a variety of methods for assess-
ing children’s skills at school entry, from standardised measures to informal teacher
judgements. In response to open-ended questions several dominant themes were
identifed: (a) concerns regarding the skill development of many new entrants; (b)
a desire for tools to assess oral language and phonological awareness; (c) prefer-
ences for tools that were current, efcient, user-friendly and appropriate for use
with young children in New Zealand; (d) the need for more time outside the class-
room for assessment and refection on assessment results; and (e) interest in profes-
sional learning and development, and teaching resources to support oral language
competencies.
Keywords Oral language · Emergent literacy skills · School entry · Assessment
Introduction
Children in New Zealand (NZ) start their schooling life with large diferences in
their prior literacy-related exposure and competencies (Education Review Ofce
[ERO] 2017, ERO 2018; Nicholson 2003; Poulton et al. 2018). In recognition of
both the strong reciprocal relationship between oral language and literacy learn-
ing (Ministry of Education [MoE] 2010), and the importance of language skills for
school success, recent initiatives in NZ have focussed on children’s oral language
skills in their early years’ education (ERO 2017; Tolley and Kaye 2017). To sup-
port successful language development, ERO (2017) has recommended that early
* Elizabeth Schaughency
schaughe@psy.otago.ac.nz
1
Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand