Citation: Wang, Q.; Ahmad, W.;
Ahmad, A.; Aslam, F.; Mohamed, A.;
Vatin, N.I. Application of Soft
Computing Techniques to Predict the
Strength of Geopolymer Composites.
Polymers 2022, 14, 1074. https://
doi.org/10.3390/polym14061074
Academic Editors: Wei-Hao Lee,
Yung-Ching Ding, Kae-Long Lin and
Paul Joseph
Received: 29 January 2022
Accepted: 26 February 2022
Published: 8 March 2022
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons
Attribution (CC BY) license (https://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
4.0/).
polymers
Article
Application of Soft Computing Techniques to Predict the
Strength of Geopolymer Composites
Qichen Wang
1,
*, Waqas Ahmad
2,
*, Ayaz Ahmad
2,3
, Fahid Aslam
4
, Abdullah Mohamed
5
and Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin
6
1
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
2
Department of Civil Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan;
ayazahmad@cuiatd.edu.pk
3
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, 24 Warszawska Str., 31-155 Cracow, Poland
4
Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University,
Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia; f.aslam@psau.edu.sa
5
Research Centre, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo 11745, Egypt; mohamed.a@fue.edu.eg
6
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195291 St. Petersburg, Russia; vatin@mail.ru
* Correspondence: qichen-wang@hotmail.com (Q.W.); waqasahmad@cuiatd.edu.pk (W.A.)
Abstract: Geopolymers may be the best alternative to ordinary Portland cement because they are
manufactured using waste materials enriched in aluminosilicate. Research on geopolymer composites
is accelerating. However, considerable work, expense, and time are needed to cast, cure, and
test specimens. The application of computational methods to the stated objective is critical for
speedy and cost-effective research. In this study, supervised machine learning approaches were
employed to predict the compressive strength of geopolymer composites. One individual machine
learning approach, decision tree, and two ensembled machine learning approaches, AdaBoost and
random forest, were used. The coefficient correlation (R
2
), statistical tests, and k-fold analysis were
used to determine the validity and comparison of all models. It was discovered that ensembled
machine learning techniques outperformed individual machine learning techniques in forecasting
the compressive strength of geopolymer composites. However, the outcomes of the individual
machine learning model were also within the acceptable limit. R
2
values of 0.90, 0.90, and 0.83 were
obtained for AdaBoost, random forest, and decision models, respectively. The models’ decreased
error values, such as mean absolute error, mean absolute percentage error, and root-mean-square
errors, further confirmed the ensembled machine learning techniques’ increased precision. Machine
learning approaches will aid the building industry by providing quick and cost-effective methods for
evaluating material properties.
Keywords: geopolymer composites; sustainable materials; compressive strength; artificial intelli-
gence; machine learning; prediction models
1. Introduction
Cement-based conventional concrete (CBCC) is the most broadly utilized type of
construction material on a global scale [1–3]. The primary constituents of CBCC are
aggregates, water, and ordinary Portland cement (OPC) [4,5]. Following aluminum and
steel, OPC is the third most energy-demanding substance on the earth, consuming 7% of the
total energy of global industry [6,7]. Regrettably, the manufacture of OPC produces large
quantities of greenhouse gases, i.e., CO
2
, which substantially add to climate change [8–10].
The production of OPC is anticipated to release 1.35 billion tons of greenhouse emissions
annually [11–13]. Thus, scholars have focused their attempts on minimizing OPC usage
through the use of alternate binder types. Alternatives to CBCC may include alkali-
activated compounds such as geopolymers [14–16]. When precursors and activators react,
alkali-activated compounds are formed. They have been categorized into two kinds based
Polymers 2022, 14, 1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14061074 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/polymers