VIEWPOINT Expanding the horizons: connecting gender and fisheries to the political economy Meryl Williams 1 Received: 16 May 2019 /Accepted: 3 September 2019 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Since 1990, papers presented at successive women/gender and fisheries conferences of the Asian Fisheries Society have followed a pathway trodden by other fields of gender research. Starting with noticing androcentrism in fisheries, the conferences proceeded to noticing the omissions and adding depth of detail on womens roles and their contributions. Adding gender perspectives then helped to identify politicized policy and power structures and recognize the importance of accounting for intersectionality, as well as propose transformation. Historically, this work is rooted in the broader scholarship on gender and fisheries, in which the positions of women are dictated by the prevailing political economy of fisheries, itself embedded in the global political economy. Despite the greater insights, the position of women has changed little. The time is therefore ripe for gender and fisheries researchers to broaden their horizons and develop a feminist fisheries political economy agenda to better support activism for gender equal fisheries. A foundation for such work has already been laid in fisheries from the gender studies and activism of fisheries restructuring under globalization. The global feminist political economy project also has paved the way. The global project can be adapted to guide three major fisheries research areas. The first is understanding the gendered structures in fisheries economies as embedded in the gendered global economy. The second key is specifically assessing fisheries economic policies and practices using the lens of womens rights in the fish value chain, from production inputs to rights of access to fish and fishing, and to womens position in post-harvest processing and marketing. The third is examining the unpaid and household economy in which a great deal of womens fisheries and reproductive work in the household and community is done. As the new research agenda and its link to activism may not be embraced by some mainstream agencies already studying gender and fisheries, do we need to create feminist fisheries political economy think tanks with greater flexibility? Keywords Gender . Political economy . Fisheries . Feminist . Research agenda . Globalization Introduction Key publications act as signposts for how womens role and power in fisheries economies have been considered in the literature. The present paper argues that successive waves of women and gender studies in fisheries have strengthened the emphasis on the role of fishing industry and market structures, and that now is the time to take the next leap in recognizing the whole extent of how women are positioned in the fisheries political economy. The time is ripe for giving women, gender and fisheries the full political economic treat- ment. So far, with some exceptions, much research on gender and fisheries has been gradually evolving towards greater awareness of the economic (and political) forces at play, as a few examples show. Rosemary Firth s 1966 update of her 1941 book, Housekeeping among Malay Peasants (Firth, Rosemary 1966), and to some extent the companion work of Raymond Firth Malay Fishermen: Their peasant economy (Firth, Raymond 1996), illustrates the earlier construction of women as very secondary actors in fisheries economies. Although both Firth books explored the intricate production and value chain interactions of women and men in a small-scale coastal fishery in (then) Malaya, Rosemary Firth portrayed her This paper is based on an oral presentation delivered by the author at the 7th Global Conference on Gender in Aquaculture and Fisheries, 1821 October 2018, Bangkok, Thailand. It presents reflections and ideas that are still in the early stages of their development, as will be evident by the preliminary level of elaboration of the forward agenda. * Meryl Williams 1 Aspley, Australia Maritime Studies https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-019-00149-y