Modelling scenarios on feed-to-fillet transfer of dioxins and dioxin-
like PCBs in future feeds to farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)
Marc H.G. Berntssen
*
, Monica Sanden, Helge Hove, Øyvind Lie
National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research (NIFES), Bergen, Norway
highlights
A salmon dioxin kinetic transfer model was validated with two salmon trials.
The model was used to predict future fillet salmon dioxin and dioxin like PCB levels when using novel feed.
Predicted future fillet levels of 1.7 ng WHO
2005
-TEQs kg
1
lw are near the limit of quantification and levels found in bovine meat.
article info
Article history:
Received 17 June 2016
Received in revised form
12 August 2016
Accepted 13 August 2016
Handling Editor: Prof. J. de Boer
Keywords:
Atlantic salmon
Dioxins
Transfer
Modelling
Novel feeds
abstract
The salmon feed composition has changed the last decade with a replacement of traditionally use of fish
oil and fishmeal diets with vegetable ingredients and the use decontaminated fish oils, causing reduced
concentrations of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs in farmed Norwegian Atlantic salmon. The development
of novel salmon feeds has prompted the need for prediction on dioxins and dl-PCB concentrations in
future farmed salmon. Prediction on fillet dioxins and dl-PCB concentrations from different feed
composition scenarios are made using a simple one-compartmental transfer model based on earlier
established dioxin and dl-PCB congener specific uptake and elimination kinetics rates. The model is
validated with two independent feeding trials, with a significant linear correlation (r
2
¼ 0.96, y ¼ 1.0x,
p < 0.0001, n ¼ 116) between observed and predicted values. Model fillet predictions are made for the
following four scenarios; (1) general feed composition of 1999, (2) feed composition of 2013, (3) future
feed composition with high fish oil and meal replacement, (4) future feed composition with high fish oil
and meal replacement and decontaminated fish oil. Model predictions of fillet dioxin and dl-PCB con-
centrations from 1999 (1.05 ng WHO
2005
-TEQs kg
1
ww) and 2013 (0.57 ng WHO
2005
-TEQs kg
1
ww) are
in line with the data observed in national surveillance programs of those years (1.1 and 0.52 ng WHO
2005
-
TEQs kg
1
ww, respectively). Future use of high replacement and decontaminated oils feeds gave pre-
dicted fillet concentrations of 0.27 ng WHO
2005
-TEQs kg
1
ww, which is near the limit of quantification.
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) is known to contain rela-
tively high concentrations of persistent environmental pollutants
(POPs) which are potentially hazardous to the consumers. These
POPs include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins [poly-
chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated di-
benzofurans (PCDFs)], polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs),
hexabromocyclodecane (HBCD), and organochlorine pesticides
(OCPs) (Hites et al., 2004; Maule et al., 2007; Shaw et al., 2008; van
Leeuwen et al., 2009). Farmed oily fish, such as Atlantic salmon, has
higher concentrations of these persistent organic pollutants (POPs)
than lean farmed fish species such as tilapia (Oreochromis mos-
sambicus, Oreochromis niloticus) and pangasius (Pangasius hypo-
phthalmus)(Nacher-Mestre et al., 2009; van Leeuwen et al., 2009).
Fish oils, obtained from pelagic fish species and used as a feed
ingredient in the high energy salmonid feeds, are the main source
of POPs in farmed Atlantic salmon fillets (Berntssen et al., 2005,
2010c; Easton et al., 2002; Jacobs et al., 2002). Seafood, and oily
fish in particular, is a dominant contributor to POP exposure such as
PCDD/Fs and dioxin-like PCBs (dl-PCBs) in the adult diets (Bergkvist
et al., 2008; De Mul et al., 2008; Fattore et al., 2008; Kvalem et al.,
2009; van Leeuwen et al., 2009; Voorspoels et al., 2008).
* Corresponding author. National Institute of Nutrition and Seafood Research,
Postbox 2029, Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway.
E-mail address: marc.berntssen@nifes.no (M.H.G. Berntssen).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Chemosphere
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphere
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.067
0045-6535/© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Chemosphere 163 (2016) 413e421