https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872211067833 Journal of Interpretation Research 2021, Vol. 26(2) 47–48 © 2021 SAGE Publications Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/10925872211067833 journals.sagepub.com/home/jix Editorial Journal of Interpretation Research: Research Is Necessary to Underpin the Field in Evidence Robert B. Powell and Marc J. Stern 1 Over the years practitioners have asked us: why is research necessary for the field? As the Journal of Interpretation Research reaches its 25th year, we thought it was fitting to answer this question. The practice of interpretation is grounded in the seminal works of Mills (1920) and Tilden (1957), which laid out the vision, mission, and principles for the fledgling field and profession. The art of interpretation and these principles for practice were largely developed from their many years of practice and observation. Over the ensuing decades, the philosophy and principles underlying the profession of interpretation were largely followed based on faith and anecdotal observation by practitioners. In other words, practitioners largely based the practice of interpretation on their judge- ment regarding the audiences’ enjoyment of their interpretive efforts. As a practitioner, you may ask, what is wrong with that? It is true that one of the key outcomes of inter- pretation is “enjoyment,” or that a program holds an individual’s attention in non- captive settings (where the audience can simply walk away). However, if the profession of interpretation is to be based on more than anecdote and accomplish more than mere “enjoyment” (or persistence), research is needed to provide evidence to examine other outcomes, improve practice, support informed decision-making, adapt to changing audiences and social conditions, and justify investments in programming. In its 25th year, the Journal of Interpretation Research stands on the shoulders of the great work of Mills and Tilden, but also dozens of more recent researchers that have advanced our field (we refrain from naming names for fear of leaving anyone out). We are now at another crossroads as interpretation is redefined for a new genera- tion. As the field seeks to “facilitate meaningful, relevant, and inclusive experiences that deepen understanding, broaden perspectives, and inspire engagement with the world around us” (NAI, 2021), research is increasingly important to ensure we meet our mission. 1 Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA Corresponding Author: Robert B. Powell, Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences Clemson University Clemson SC, USA. Email: rbp@clemson.edu 1067833JIX XX X 10.1177/10925872211067833Journal of Interpretation ResearchPowell and Stern research-article 2021