Light-Emitting -FeSi X Ge 1-X 2 Nanodots on Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 Substrate Y. L. Chueh, L. J. Chou, * ,z S. L. Cheng, J. H. He, W. W. Wu, and L. J. Chen * Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan Uniformly distributed dome-shaped -FeSi x Ge 1-x 2 nanodots synthesized on Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 are reported. A photoluminescence peak at 0.82 eV 1510 nmis observed at 20 K for -FeSi x Ge 1-x 2 nanodots grown epitaxial on Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 substrate. © 2005 The Electrochemical Society. DOI: 10.1149/1.1896468All rights reserved. Manuscript submitted November 10, 2004; revised manuscript received January 18, 2005. Available electronically April 18, 2005. Silicon-based light-emitting materials, such as SiGe superlattice structures, 1 porous Si, 2 nanocrystalline Si, 3 erbium-doped Si, 4 and -FeSi 2 5 have been widely investigated. -FeSi 2 with a bandgap of about 0.87 eV has the minimum absorption for transmitting in silica optical fiber at room temperature. It is a silicon-based material, which has the possibility to be integrated with the well-developed Si-based semiconductor processes. Previous reports have revealed that the dot-like shape of -FeSi 2 formed by ion beam synthesis IBS, reactive deposition epitaxy RDE, or molecular beam epi- taxy MBEseems to have better emitting performance than that of the thin film. 6-8 Moreover, Si 1-x Ge x has attracted much attention for its applica- tions in microelectronics and optoelectronics due to its variable bandgap and lattice parameter depending on the fraction of Ge at- oms in the Si layer. The SiGe devices, such as heterojunction bipolar transistors HBTs, and modulation-doped field-effect transistors MODFETsor as the template for fabrication of regularly arranged nanostructures has been hot topics in recent years. 9-11 Previous studies have revealed that agglomeration of germanosi- licide and Ge-rich SiGe has been found in the reaction of metal thin film with SiGe. 12-15 This may attribute to the tendency of metal atoms to react preferentially with Si. Consequently, Ge is precipi- tated out of the silicide along grain boundary, resulting in the for- mation of Ge-rich SiGe agglomeration. In the present study, a-Si and epi-Si layers with different thicknesses were employed to grow the -FeSi X Ge 1-X 2 nanodots on Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 substrate. The micro- structures and the PL property are studied by means of HRTEM and PL spectroscopy. The morphology and the formation mechanisms are discussed. The approach provided a useful technique for synthe- sis of a large-area, high-quality light emitting -FeSi X Ge 1-X 2 nanoparticle on SiGe substrate. Experimental Single crystal, 1-30 -cm, 001oriented silicon wafers with a miscut angle of less than 0.5° were used in the present study. 800 nm thick Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 and 200 nm thick low-temperature Si buffer layers were deposited on the Si substrates by ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapor deposition UHV-CVDat 400°C. Surface oxide layers on SiGe substrate were removed by etching instead of boiling in acid solutions. The acid solution was composed of H 2 SO 4 :H 2 O 2 = 5:3. 16 The concentration of the acid solution needed to be monitored carefully to prevent the surface from serious pitting. The wafers were dipped in a dilute HF solution HF:H 2 O = 1:50 for 2 min immediately before loading into UHV electron-beam evaporation chamber with a base pressure of 1 10 -10 Torr. 4, 6, 7, and 8 nm thick amorphous- and epitaxial-Si layers were evaporated by UHV-E-beam at room temperature and UHV-CVD at 600°C, respectively. Subsequently, a 1.5 nm thick Fe film was evaporated on top of the amorphous- and epitaxial-Si layers by UHV-E-beam at room temperature. Samples were annealed at 850°C for 5 h in a vacuum at a pressure lower than 10 -8 Torr. A JEM-3000F field- emission transmission electron microscope FETEMequipped with an energy dispersion spectrometer EDS, operating at 300 kV with point-to-point resolution of 0.17 nm and a JSM-6500F field- emission scanning electron microscope FESEM, operating at 15 kV were used to study the microstructures and the surface morphol- ogy. In the PL measurements, samples were cooled to 20 K using a cryopump system. The samples were excited by an Ar + laser with the exciting wavelength of 514 nm and the beam diameter of less than 1 mm. Results and Discussion Figures 1a-d show SEMs of Fe 1.5 nm/a-Si 4,6,7,8 nm/Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 samples annealed at 850°C for 5 h. The surface morphology changes from discontinuous film to dome- shaped nanodots with decreasing thicknesses of a-Si layers. In the present study, the dome-shaped nanodots are found to be distributed uniformly at Fe 1.5 nm/a-Si 4 nm/Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 sample. The corre- sponding magnified SEM shows the uniformly distributed dome- shaped nanodots with dimension of 40-50 nm inset in Fig. 1d. Figures 2a-c show the XTEM images of Fe 1.5 nm/a- Si 8,6,4 nm/Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 sample after annealing at 850°C for 5 h. A wetting layer is found at Fe 1.5 nm/a-Si 8 nm/Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 sample, but as decreasing the thickness of a-Si, the morphology changed from wetting layer to random island on Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 substrate. While the thickness of a-Si decreased to 4 nm, the dome-shaped dots were found to be half embedded on the leveling of surface with dimension of 40-50 nm and length of 20-30 nm. The corresponding plan-view TEM, as shown in Fig. 2d, displays the nanodots distrib- uted uniformly on SiGe substrate. From the diffraction pattern analysis, as shown in the inset of Fig. 2d, the phase is polycrystal- line disilicide with calculated interatomic spacing of 0.308, 0.247, 0.1978, 0.182, and 0.151 nm, respectively. The corresponding planes are 202, 222, 313, 204, and 440. From the TEM/EDS mea- surements, the dots are composed of Fe, Si, and Ge with atomic concentrations of 30, 65, and 5%, respectively. The phase was iden- tified as -FeSi X Ge 1-X 2 , where some Ge atoms are involved into silicidation process. In addition, the surfaces near the - FeSi X Ge 1-X 2 nanodots were flat, whose composition of Si and Ge at interface are 80 and 20%, respectively by TEM/EDS measure- ments, indicating that the segregation of Ge is prevented. To replace the a-Si by the epi-Si layers, the SEMs reveal the uniformly distributed dome-shaped nanodots but different in size, as shown in Fig. 3a and b. Figures 3c and d show the XTEMs of the dome-shaped nanodots, revealing that no defects are found in both samples. The diameters of dome-shaped nanodots changed from 40-50 nm to 30-40 nm by decreasing the thicknesses of interfacial epi-Si from 6 to 4 nm. The dome-shaped nanodots were composed of Si, Fe, and Ge to be about 64, 33, and 3%, respectively, by TEM/EDS measurements for Fe 1.5 nm/epi-Si 4 nm/Si 0.8 Ge 0.2 sample, indicating that the phase of the dome-shaped nanodots is dislicide phase -FeSi X Ge 1-X 2 . Figure 4a shows plan-view TEMs * Electrochemical Society Active Member. z E-mail: ljchou@mx.nthu.edu.tw Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, 8 6G137-G139 2005 1099-0062/2005/86/G137/3/$7.00 © The Electrochemical Society, Inc. G137