Quantifying the implementation of Common Fisheries Policy: Patterns of sheries violations and penalties imposed in Greek waters Dimitrios K. Moutopoulos a,n , George Prodromitis b , Irene Mantzouni c , Constantin Koutsikopoulos d a Technological Educational Institute of Western Greece, Department of Fisheries-Aquaculture Technology, Nea Ktiria, 30200 Messolonghi, Greece b Ministry of Shipping and the Aegean, Hellenic Coast Guard, 18510 Piraeus, Greece c 29 Syggrou Avenue, 11743 Athens, Greece d University of Patras, Department of Biology, Section of Zoology, 26500 Rio-Patras, Greece article info Article history: Received 19 March 2016 Received in revised form 21 April 2016 Accepted 24 April 2016 abstract Illegal shing has been recognized as a global problem in achieving sheries sustainability. In the present study, the sheries violations and nes/penalties imposed per shery recorded by Ministry of Mercantile Marine were analysed for the Greek waters during 19992013. Spatio-temporal patterns identied were related to: (a) easy access operating illegal shery, (b) shing effort/species abundance spatial dis- tribution, (c) area topography, (d) local restrictions, and (e) eet structure. Findings are crucial towards the specication of the critical zones and temporal closures for setting an efcient control system to- wards achieving sustainability. Improvements to the implementation of the shing control involve the identication of high-risk areas prone to illegal shing, the rationalisation of the sheries legislation, the harmonization of proportionate administrative nes and the increase of transparency in the decision- making process. These might increase the efciency of the sheries control which in turns will enhance the credibility of Common Fisheries Policy. These might control the efciency of the sheries which in turns will enhance the credibility of the Common Fisheries Policy. & 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction The intensication of shing effort in order to surpass the poor state of sh stocks [1] together in combination with the double increase in sh consumption during the last 50 years [2] appears to increase illegal shing activities [3]. This, together with the estimation of unreported sheries landings, has been recognized as a global problem [4]. In fact, illegal shing has ecological, managerial and socio-economic ramications by: (a) provoking collateral damage to the marine environment, sustainability of sh stocks and marine biodiversity [5], (b) preventing the estimation of the truecatches of the stocks that might lead to treacherous managerial directions [6], (c) jeopardizing the credibility of Com- mon Fisheries Policy and EU's effort to promote better marine governance [7] and (d) lowering the prices for legal sh detriment to the shermen operating lawfully [8]. Assessments of illegal shing are, so far, done using extensive scale units, such as Large Marine Ecosystem (LME) or Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ), and include: (a) indirect estimations on the global level of illegal and unreported catches [9], (b) illegal shing from large shing vessels [3,10], (c) behavioural traits of the illegal shermen [4,11] and (d) theoretical approaches on cost and ben- ets [3,12]. Nevertheless, the use of large spatial units can mask the possible effects that are ecologically relevant at lower spatial scale [13]. In addition, the in-depth understanding of the qualita- tive characteristics of the illegal shery (i.e. types of sheries violations, harmonization of new laws and types of nes imposed) has never been described. This attains high signicance for the Eastern Mediterranean Seas where the multi-gear nature of the shery homogenizes the efforts of the sheries controls and poses difculties in the implementation of management decisions [14]. In Greece, marine sheries policy is planned by the Ministry of Rural Development and Food, whereas the implementation of the issued laws is supervised by the Ministry of Mercantile Marine through coast guard authorities. Fishing activity in Greek waters is determined by European [15] and National (Decree 420/70) reg- ulations (i.e., licensing system, spatio-temporal prohibitions of sheries, gear-specic prohibitions, minimum landing sizes and arrangements made for the leasing of lagoons), whereas other supplementary measures complement the management of shing effort and shing capacity per shery. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol Marine Policy http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.036 0308-597X/& 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. n Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: dmoutopo@teimes.gr (D.K. Moutopoulos), progonosls@gmail.com (G. Prodromitis), emantzo@hotmail.com (I. Mantzouni), ckoutsi@upatras.gr (C. Koutsikopoulos). Marine Policy 70 (2016) 6576