Downloaded from http://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery by BhDMf5ePHKbH4TTImqenVH0e3gbzxI4tsIrYo12X3Y0xveYZavDEDS6x9ovuSOTe on 01/31/2019
Copyright © 2018 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Intraoral Endoscopic Ligation of Maxillary Artery in the
Infratemporal Fossa
Georgiy A. Polev, MD, PhD,
Ricardo L. Carrau, MD, PhD,
y
Denis A. Golbin, MD, PhD,
z
Klementina S. Avdeeva, MD,
Nickolai S. Grachev, MD, PhD,
Igor N. Vorozhtsov, MD,
Nikolay V. Lasunin, MD, PhD,
z
Vasily A. Cherekaev, MD, PhD,
z
and Juan Eugenio Salas Galicia, MD, PhD
§
Abstract: Ligation of the sphenopalatine and posterior nasal arteries
is indicated for posterior epistaxis as initial treatment or when
conservative measures fail. In some patients, a transnasal approach
or its alternative transantral approach are not possible due to tumor
filling the nasal corridor, pterygopalatine fossa, or maxillary sinus.
Aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility of endoscopically
assisted transoral approach for the ligation of the maxillary artery
(MA). Six fresh cadaver specimens (12 sides), previously prepared
with intravascular injections of colored latex, were dissected. A
combined transnasal and transoral approach exposed the MA from
the deep belly of the temporalis muscle laterally to its terminal
branches medially. Anatomical relationships of the MA with the
deep belly of the temporalis muscle and the lower head of the lateral
pterygoid muscle, and feasibility of access to the MA via a transoral
approach were assessed. In all specimens, the MA was found at the
point where horizontal fibers of the lower head of the lateral pterygoid
muscle cross the vertical fibers of the deep belly of the temporalis
muscle. In 5 specimens, the artery ran anteriorly and laterally to lower
head of the lateral pterygoid muscle, and in 1 specimen, it ran
posteriorly and medially to this muscle, diving between its fibers.
The modified endoscopically assisted transoral approach is feasible to
ligate the MA. It can be used for proximal vascular control in cases
when transnasal and transantral approaches are not viable.
Key Words: Endoscopic endonasal approach, infratemporal fossa,
maxillary artery, severe epistaxis, transoral approach
(J Craniofac Surg 2019;30: 137–140)
S
urgical treatment of epistaxis often ensues as initial treatment in
severe cases or when conservative measures fail. Endoscopic
dissection and cautery or clipping of the sphenopalatine artery
(SPA) and posterior nasal artery for posterior epistaxis is associated
with a high success rate and minor morbidity.
1–4
However, there are
circumstances where the transnasal endoscopic approach to the
distal branches of maxillary artery (MA) is not feasible, for exam-
ple, tumor filling the nasal cavity. Lateral approaches have been
previously described, including the transantral and the transoral
with dissection of the artery between the ramus of the mandible and
temporalis muscle.
5,6
Similar to the transnasal approach, the trans-
antral approach may also be hindered by tumor in the pterygopa-
latine fossa (PPF) or maxillary sinus. Developed in the pre-
endoscopic era, these approaches may carry significant morbidity,
mainly in the form of facial numbness and trismus due to the
manipulation of the pterygoid muscles.
6
This study introduces the modified transoral endoscopic-
assisted (‘‘around-the-maxilla’’) approach for MA ligation at a
point that is medial to the deep belly of temporalis muscle (DBTM).
Furthermore, this study aims to evaluate the viability and safety of
transoral approach and to highlight critical anatomical landmarks
based on a series of cadaveric dissections. A case presentation of a
patient who required urgent transoral endoscopic MA ligation as an
alternative procedure to embolization illustrates the utility of
the approach.
METHODS
The anatomic study was performed in 6 fresh cadaver specimens (12
sides), previously prepared with intravascular injection of colored
latex. All dissections were performed using a 4 mm 308 rigid rod-
lens endoscope and full-HD video camera (all manufactured by
Karl Storz GmbH & Co KG, Tuttlingen, Germany) using basic set
of instruments for sinus and skull base surgery. All photo and video
recordings were performed using digital HD video recorder. Each
cadaveric dissection followed the same consecutive steps.
First, the transnasal corridor step was expanded to include
a medial maxillectomy, PPF, and infratemporal fossa (ITF)
dissection, exposing the MA, its terminal branches, and the
buccal nerve.
Then, the transoral corridor was opened. An intraoral vertical
vestibular incision was carried starting just inferior to maxillary
tuberosity. A subperiosteal dissection with the endoscopic assis-
tance exposed the anterolateral maxillary sinus wall back to the
level of posterior wall. At this level the buccal fat herniated into the
wound and was removed with careful preservation of its supplying
vessels (in most specimens, branches of the anterior deep temporal
artery and posterior superior alveolar artery were found at this
From the
Department of Oncology and Pediatric Surgery, Dmitry
Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncol-
ogy and Immunology, Moscow, Russia;
y
Department of Otolaryngology
- Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical
Center, Columbus, OH;
z
Department of Skull Base and Craniofacial
Surgery, Laboratory for Neuroanatomy and Biorepository, NN Burdenko
National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russia;
and
§
Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Endo-
scopic Sinus Surgery and Skull Base Surgery, Autonomous University of
Veracruz, Xalapa, Mexico.
Received July 3, 2018.
Accepted for publication July 24, 2018.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Georgiy A. Polev, MD,
PhD, Department of Oncology and Pediatric Surgery, Dmitry Rogachev
National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and
Immunology, Samory Mashela str, 1, Moscow 117997, Russia;
E-mail: drpolev@gmail.com
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Supplemental digital contents are available for this article. Direct URL
citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and
PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.jcraniofa-
cialsurgery.com).
Copyright
#
2018 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD
ISSN: 1049-2275
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004981
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume 30, Number 1, January 2019 137