Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Economic Modelling journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/econmod Tariinduced licensing contracts, consumerssurplus and welfare Abhishek Kabiraj, Tarun Kabiraj Indian Statistical Institute ARTICLE INFO JEL classications: D43 F13 L13 Keywords: Two-part taricontracts Fee licensing Royalty licensing Consumerssurplus Welfare Tariprotection ABSTRACT We construct a duopolistic trade model with technology transfer and consider two-part tarilicensing contracts. We show that a tarion foreign products can inuence the licensing strategy of the foreign rm. There is a trade-obetween a tariand a royalty license in aecting the product price. We show in particular that a tari can be chosen so as to induce fee licensing and maximize both consumerssurplus and domestic welfare. This resolves the so-called conict between these two objectives in respect of the choice of a tari. The paper provides a number of testable hypothesis. 1. Introduction Many countries, particularly the developing ones, after following a policy of protectionism for a long time, have switched to the policy of liberalization and opening up. The basic thrust of this liberalization policy is to reduce trade restrictions and promote free competition. The World Trade Organization (WTO), the key international organization in world trade, has been entrusted with the task of framing rules and regulations and implementing a free and smooth movement of goods and services between countries. The WTO is insisting throughout the period on lowering the tarirates to the minimum. Still many countries, both WTO members and non-members, are observed to continue with high taris, 1 and this is happening in spite of an internal pressure to lower taris to favor the consumers who were the worst suerers in the regime of protection and trade restriction. Therefore, it calls for a more careful analysis. Perhaps tarias an instrument cannot be ignored in the process of development even in a period of liberal- ization. Under liberalization as taris on foreign products are lowered, the foreign rms nd it easy to enter the domestic market. This generally increases competition in the domestic market and benets the con- sumers. One may then tend to believe that consumerswelfare would be maximum if taris are reduced to zero. A positive tari, on the other hand, benets the local rms; the domestic government also collects tarirevenue on foreign products. To the extent consumers suer under tariprotection, the local government may perhaps justify positive taris stating that it seeks to maximize domestic welfare. The existing literature generally accepts this conict to exist between welfare maximization and loss of consumerssurplus. Hence one purpose of the present paper is to examine whether it is possible to design a taripolicy that will target to maximize both social and consumerswelfare. The related question is: Does a taribenet the consumers? A government pursuing a tariprotection generally raises its domestic welfare, but that is often at the cost of a higher product price. So the consumers as a class become adversely aected. To a political party in power seeking to win an election, such a policy may not be desirable. After all, consumers form the largest electorate group; so consumerswelfare cannot be ignored. One important feature of the present paper is that while analyzing tariprotection, we introduce technology licensing. When a country follows a policy of prohibitive tari, the foreign rm cannot directly enter the domestic market with goods. Under this situation it transfers its superior technology to a domestic rm and extracts rent from the domestic market by charging an appropriate price for the transferred technology. 2 Under non-prohibitive taris, on the other hand, not only can the foreign rm enter the domestic market directly, but at the same time it has the option to transfer its superior technology to its product market competitor. Technology transfer from an advanced foreign rm to a technologically backward domestic rm is common and well- documented. A recent survey conducted by the OECD in collaboration http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.11.001 Received 6 May 2016; Received in revised form 2 November 2016; Accepted 3 November 2016 Correspondence to: Economic Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203 B. T. Road, Kolkata 700108, India. E-mail addresses: kabiraj27abhishek@gmail.com (A. Kabiraj), tarunkabiraj@hotmail.com (T. Kabiraj). 1 This is evident from the statistics and information published in the World TariProles 2015 (see the website www.wto.org/statistics). 2 This was actually the experience in India before liberalization (see, for instance, Alam (1985)). Economic Modelling 60 (2017) 439–447 0264-9993/ © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Available online 14 November 2016 crossmark