Vol.:(0123456789) 1 3
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
DOI 10.1007/s00167-017-4724-2
KNEE
Tibial shaft anatomy difers between Caucasians and East Asian
individuals
Hongyi Shao
1
· Chilung Chen
2
· Daniel Scholl
3
· Ahmad Faizan
3
· Antonia F. Chen
4
Received: 24 March 2017 / Accepted: 15 September 2017
© European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2017
distance between the femoral shaft centre and Whiteside’s
line was lower, although not signifcantly diferent (Asians
1.9 ± 1.0 mm, Caucasians 2.2 ± 1.1 mm, n.s.). However,
there were no diferences in the AP dimension for the femur
or tibia comparing Asians to Caucasians in both tibial side
(Asians 10.6 ± 3.3 mm vs. Caucasians 10.9 ± 4.0 mm)
and femoral side (Asians 18.1 ± 1.7 mm vs. Caucasians
17.5 ± 1.6 mm).
Conclusion East Asian individuals have more ofset in the
ML dimension for the tibia. This fnding is clinical relevant,
as this dimensional diference should be taken into consid-
eration when designing primary and revision TKA stemmed
tibial implants for East Asian individuals.
Level of evidence Case–control study, Level III.
Keywords Tibia · Femur · Shaft · Total knee
arthroplasty · Caucasian · East Asian
Introduction
The incidence of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
has increased over the past decade, and it will continue to
increase during the next 20 years [21]. To provide adequate
fxation and stability in total knee revisions (TKR), compo-
nents with stem extensions may be needed, especially when
there is extensive bone loss [9] or when condylar constrained
prostheses are used [23]. Fleischman et al. [14] reported
that the lack of intramedullary canal fll from cementless
stemmed components was the strongest predict of failure
in revision TKA. Intramedullary axes can provide more
precise anatomic landmarks compared to other methods,
as the fbular axis was not a reliable landmark for deter-
mining the tibial mechanical axis [20]. However, tibial and
femoral shaft axes may not always match the centre of the
Abstract
Purpose The orientation and distance from the shaft of the
femur and tibia to the articular surface centre is important
for performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cement-
less stems. It is important to understand anatomic diferences
between races to match the tibial and femoral shaft axis to
the knee articular surface. Thus, the purpose of this study
was to compare knee morphology between Caucasian and
East Asian individuals to determine the optimal placement
of tibial and femoral stems.
Methods A retrospective study was conducted on a
matched cohort of 50 East Asians (21F, 29M) and 50 Cauca-
sians (21F, 29M) by age and gender. CT scans were obtained
in healthy volunteers using < 2-mm slices. The distance
from the proximal tibial diaphysis axis to the tibial plateau
centre and the distance from the distal femoral diaphysis
axis to the centre of distal femoral articular surface were
measured separately. Tibial measurements were taken using
Akagi’s anteroposterior (AP) axis and the widest mediolat-
eral (ML) diameter, and femoral measurements were based
on Whiteside’s line and the surgical epicondylar axis.
Results The ML distance between the tibial shaft cen-
tre and Akagi’s line was signifcantly higher for Asians
(9.9 ± 2.7 mm, Caucasians 7.7 ± 3.1 mm, p < 0.001). The
* Antonia F. Chen
antonia.chen@rothmaninstitute.com
1
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan
Hospital, Beijing, China
2
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial
Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
3
Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA
4
Rothman Institute, Thomas Jeferson University Hospital,
925 Chestnut Street, 5th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA