Evidence-based Canadian guidelines for tele-retina screening
for diabetic retinopathy: recommendations from the Canadian
Retina Research Network (CR2N) Tele-Retina Steering
Committee
M.C. Boucher,* J. Qian,
y,z
M.H. Brent,
z,x
D.T. Wong,
z,║
T. Sheidow,
{
R. Duval,* A. Kherani,**
R. Dookeran,
yy
D. Maberley,
zz
A. Samad,
xx
V. Chaudhary
y
Steering Committee for Tele-Ophthalmology
Screening, Canadian Retina Research Network
ABSTRACT
Objective: The purpose of this report is to develop a consensus for Canadian national guidelines specific to a tele-medicine approach to
screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) using evidence-based and clinical data.
Methods: Canadian Tele-Screening Grading Scales for DR and diabetic macular edema (DME) were created primarily based on severity
grading scales outlined by the International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Disease Severity Scale (ICDR) and the Scottish DR Grading
Scheme 2007. Other grading scales used in international screening programs and the clinical expertise of the Canadian Retina
Research Network members and retina specialists nationwide were also used in the creation of the guidelines.
Results: National Tele-Screening Guidelines for DR and DME with and without optical coherence tomography (OCT) images are pro-
posed. These outline a diagnosis and management algorithm for patients presenting with different stages of DR and/or DME. General
guidelines detailing the requirements for imaged retina fields, image quality, quality control, and follow-up care and the role of visual
acuity, pupil dilation, OCT, ultra-wide-field imaging, and artificial intelligence are discussed.
Conclusions: Tele-retina screening can help to address the need for timely and effective screening for DR, whose prevalence continues
to rise. A standardized and evidence-based national approach to DR tele-screening has been proposed, based on DR/DME grading
using two 45° image fields or a single widefield or ultra-wide-field image, preferable use of OCT imaging, and a focus on local quality
control measures.
In 2018, the estimated prevalence of diagnosed diabetes in
Canada was approximately 3.6 million Canadians, or 9% of
the population. According to Diabetes Canada, this is
expected to increase to affect approximately 4.7 million or
11% of the Canadian population by 2028.
1
Diabetic retinop-
athy (DR), a complication of diabetes, is the most common
cause of legal blindness in the working-age population and
the leading cause of visual impairment in Canada.
24
Although treatments are available for sight-threatening
DR, this requires effective screening strategies for follow-up
and management. With the increasing prevalence of DR and
advances in ophthalmic imaging technologies, tele-ophthal-
mology initiatives are being increasingly used in Canada and
worldwide to identify and triage patients with DR.
5
How-
ever, successful DR screening, especially as it relates to tele-
medicine that may be employed on a more widespread scale,
requires adherence to consistent guidelines for retinal imag-
ing, grading DR severity, and recommendations for referral.
At the moment, there are no national guidelines for DR
tele-screening and grading in Canada. Implementation of such
guidelines would provide quality assurance and enable consis-
tent comparison and analysis of data for optimal patient
management. The Canadian Retina Research Network
(CR2N) struck a steering committee with retinal experts across
Canada in 2019 to develop consensus guidelines on the topic
of tele-retinal screening for DR using evidence-based and clini-
cal data. These guidelines comprise the key recommendations
from that working group and are endorsed by the CR2N. The
appropriateness of these guidelines will be assessed at regular
intervals and revised as programs grow, new technologies
emerge, and other updates become available.
TAGGEDH1GENERAL GUIDELINESTAGGEDEND
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for DR Tele-Screening
Inclusion criteria
Patients 12 years old with type 2 diabetes
Exclusion criteria
Pregnancy: information about pregnancy may not be con-
sistently transmitted to or seen by the readers with conse-
quent risk of inadequate follow-up and recommended
management in pregnant diabetics with DR.
© 2020 Canadian Ophthalmological Society.
Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2020.01.001
ISSN 0008-4182
14 CAN J OPHTHALMOL—VOL. 55, NO. 1S1, FEBRUARY 2020