Vol.:(0123456789) 1 3
Experimental Brain Research
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05597-w
RESEARCH ARTICLE
On ignoring words—exploring the neural signature of inhibition
of afective words using ERPs
Laura‑Ef Seib‑Pfeifer
1
· Judith Koppehele‑Gossel
1
· Henning Gibbons
1
Received: 11 February 2019 / Accepted: 4 July 2019
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019
Abstract
In the present study event-related potentials were used to shed further light on the neural signatures of active inhibition of
the (afective) content of written words. Intentional inhibition was implemented by simply asking participants (N = 32) to
ignore single words that served as primes in an afective priming (AP) task. In AP, evaluations about a priori neutral targets
typically tend to shift towards the valence of preceding primes, denoting an AP efect (APE). To create a plausible cover-
context emphasizing the usefulness of word inhibition, participants were asked to avoid this shift, that is, to make unbiased
target evaluations. Ignoring the prime words was suggested as the most efcient strategy to achieve this aim. Efective
inhibition of the words’ (afective) content, as suggested by a signifcant APE present for words processed without any
further instruction, but not for ignored ones, afected multiple stages of processing. On the neuronal level, word inhibition
was characterized by reduced early perceptual (left-lateralized word-specifc N170), later attentional (parietal P300), and
afective-semantic processing (reduced posterior semantic asymmetry). Furthermore, an additional recruitment of top-down
inhibitory control processes, which was mirrored in increased amplitudes of medial-frontal negativity, showed to be critically
involved in intentional word inhibition.
Keywords Word inhibition · ERPs · Perceptual, attentional and semantic processing · Posterior semantic asymmetry
(PSA) · Executive control
Introduction
To (intentionally) direct capacity-limited attentional
resources to a situation or an object of interest can alter the
perceptual selection of information depending on current
goals and task demands. The ability to do so allows to pri-
oritize and respond to only those aspects of the environment
that are selected as relevant from a multitude of distractors
competing for the control of behaviour. Facilitated access
of relevant information coinciding with a simultaneous
downregulation of processing of irrelevant or unwanted con-
tent protects the controlled information processing system
against overload and enables adaptive behaviour (Ruz et al.
2005a).
Considerable debate has centered on the fate of deliber-
ately unattended information, that is, information regarded
not worth to be processed because it is irrelevant or even
disturbing (Driver 2001; Lavie and Tsal 1994; Ruz et al.
2005a). Given the everyday importance of written material,
the extent of (semantic) processing of unattended words has
emerged as a question of enduring interest and controversy
(Kissler et al. 2009; McCarthy and Nobre 1993; Ruz et al.
2005a, b; Schindler and Kissler 2016).
1
Although lexical and
semantic processing can occur in a rather automatic fashion
(Navarrete et al. 2015; Ruz et al. 2005b; Walker et al. 2017),
overall word processing turns out to be considerably afected
by the allocation of selective processing resources (Driver
2001; Rees et al. 1999; Ruz et al. 2005a, b). This spans from
basal perceptual (McCarthy and Nobre 1993), over atten-
tional (Holcomb 1988; Kissler et al. 2009), to higher-level
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this
article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-019-05597-w) contains
supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
* Laura-Ef Seib-Pfeifer
l.seib-pfeifer@uni-bonn.de
1
Department of Psychology, University of Bonn,
Kaiser-Karl-Ring 9, 53111 Bonn, Germany
1
Note that given systematic diferences in processing across the
modalities, we will mainly focus on fndings on written words, leav-
ing aside other stimulus categories (e.g., pictures; see Bayer and
Schacht 2014).