Effects of Macroporous Resin Size on Candida antarctica Lipase B
Adsorption, Fraction of Active Molecules, and Catalytic Activity for
Polyester Synthesis
Bo Chen,
†
Elizabeth M. Miller,
‡
Lisa Miller,
§
John J. Maikner,
‡
and Richard A. Gross*
,†
NSF I/UCRC for Biocatalysis and Bioprocessing of Macromolecules, Polytechnic UniVersity, 6 Metrotech
Center, Brooklyn, New York 11201, Rohm and Haas Co., P.O. Box 904, Spring House, PennsylVania
19477, and National Synchrotron Light Source, BrookhaVen National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973
ReceiVed July 31, 2006. In Final Form: October 7, 2006
Methyl methacrylate resins with identical average pore diameter (250 Å) and surface area (500 m
2
/g) but with varied
particle size (35 to 560-710 µm) were employed to study how immobilization resin particle size influences Candida
antarctica Lipase B (CALB) loading, fraction of active sites, and catalytic properties for polyester synthesis. CALB
adsorbed more rapidly on smaller beads. Saturation occurred in less than 30 s and 48 h for beads with diameters 35
and 560-710 µm, respectively. Linearization of adsorption isotherm data by the Scatchard analysis showed for the
35 µm resin that: (i) CALB loading at saturation was well below that required to form a monolayer and fully cover
the support surface and (ii) CALB has a high affinity for this resin surface. Infrared microspectroscopy showed that
CALB forms protein loading fronts for resins with particle sizes 560-710 and 120 µm. In contrast, CALB appears
evenly distributed throughout 35 µm resins. By titration with p-nitrophenyl n-hexyl phosphate (MNPHP), the fraction
of active CALB molecules adsorbed onto resins was <50% which was not influenced by particle size. The fraction
of active CALB molecules on the 35 µm support increased from 30 to 43% as enzyme loading was increased from
0.9 to 5.7% (w/w) leading to increased activity for ǫ-caprolactone (ǫ-CL) ring-opening polymerization. At about 5%
w/w CALB loading, by decreasing the immobilization support diameter from 560-710 to 120, 75, and 35 µm,
conversion of ǫ-CL % to polyester increased (20 to 36, 42, and 61%, respectively, at 80 min). Similar trends were
observed for condensation polymerizations between 1,8-octanediol and adipic acid.
Introduction
Application of immobilized enzymes in biocatalytic practice
offers unique advantages over soluble enzymes, such as enhanced
activity, increased selectivity, improved stability, and reusability.
Adsorption is a simple and straightforward route for biomolecule
immobilization. By this method, sufficient quantities of active
enzyme have been immobilized and used for industrial processes.
For example, Assemblase, the commercial name of immobilized
pencillin-G acylase from Escherichia coli, has been used by
industry for manufacture of the semi-synthetic -lactam antibiotic
cephalexin.
1,2
Candida antarctica Lipase B (CALB), due to its unique
properties, is attracting increased attention as a biocatalyst for
the synthesis of low molar mass and polymeric molecules.
3-6
Almost all publications on immobilized CALB use the com-
mercially available catalyst Novozyme 435, which consists of
CALB physically adsorbed onto a macroporous acrylic polymer
resin (Lewatit VP OC 1600, Bayer). Primarily, commercial uses
of CALB are limited to production of high-priced specialty
chemicals
7-9
because of the high cost of commercially available
CALB preparations: Novozyme 435 (Novozymes A/S) and
Chirazyme (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). It is urgent for
CALB and other enzymes of commercial importance to focus
attention on studies to better correlate enzyme activity to support
parameters. The outcome of such work will lead to improved
catalysts that have acceptable price-performance characteristics
for an expanded range of industrial processes.
Most research on immobilization has focused on choice of
matrix materials and optimization of immobilization condi-
tions,
10-21
such as hydrophobicity of the support surface
17-19
and pH
20,21
of the enzyme solution. Physical properties of supports
* Corresponding author. E-mail: rgross@poly.edu.
†
Polytechnic University.
‡
Rohm and Haas Co.
§
Brookhaven National Laboratory.
(1) Schroe ¨n, C. G. P. H.; Nierstrasz, V. A.; Moody, H. M.; Hoogschagen, M.
J.; Kroon, P. J.; Bosma, R.; Beeftink, H. H.; Janssen, A. E. M.; Tramper, J.
Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 73, 171-178.
(2) Schroe ¨n, C. G. P. H.; Nierstrasz, V. A.; Kroon, P. J.; Bosma, R.; Janssen,
A. E. M.; Beeftink, H. H.; Tramper, J. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1999, 24, 498-
506.
(3) Gross, R. A.; Kalra, B. Science 2002, 297, 803-806.
(4) Gross, R. A.; Kumar, A.; Kalra, B. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 2097-2124.
(5) Kobayashi, S.; Uyama, H.; Kimura, S. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 3793.
(6) Cheng, H. N., Gross, R. A., Eds.; Polymer Biocatalysis and Biomaterials;
ACS Symposium Series 900; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC,
2005.
(7) Kirk, O.; Christensen, M. W. Org. Process Res. DeV. 2002, 6, 446-451.
(8) Anderson, E. M.; Larsson, K. M.; Kirk, O. Biocatal. Biotransform. 1998,
16, 181-204.
(9) Houde, A.; Kademi, A.; Danielle Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2004, 118,
155-170.
(10) Dyal, A.; Loos, K.; Noto, M.; Chang, S. W.; Spagnoli, C.; Shafi, K. V.
P. M.; Ulman, A.; Cowman, M.; Gross, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
1684-1685.
(11) Dessouki, A. M.; Atia, K. S. Biomacromolecules 2002, 3, 432-437.
(12) Maury, S.; Buisson, P.; Pierre, A. C. Langmuir 2001, 17, 6443-6446.
(13) Soellner, M. B.; Dickson, K. A.; Nilsson, B. L.; Raines, R. T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11790-11791.
(14) Duracher, D.; Elaissari, A.; Mallet, F.; Pichot, C. Langmuir 2000, 16,
9002-9008.
(15) Lei, C.; Shin, Y.; Liu, J.; Ackerman, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
11242-11243.
(16) Gill, I.; Pastor, E.; Ballesteros, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9487-
9496.
(17) Bastida, A.; Sabuquillo, P.; Armisen, P.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R.; Huguet,
J.; Guisan, J. M. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1998, 58, 486-493.
(18) Sigal, G. B.; Mrksich, M.; M., G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 3464-
3473.
(19) Koutsopoulos, S.; van der Oost, J.; Norde, W. Langmuir 2004, 20, 6401-
6406.
(20) Xu, K.; Klibanov, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9815-9819.
(21) Pancera, S. M.; Gliemann, H., Schimmel, T.; Petri, D. F. S. J. Phys.
Chem. B 2006, 110, 2674-2680.
1381 Langmuir 2007, 23, 1381-1387
10.1021/la062258u CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 12/29/2006