416 Volume 2 Issue 1, March 2017: pp. 416-428. Copyright © 2018 HOLREV. Faculty of Law, Halu Oleo University, Kendari, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. ISSN: 2548-1762 | e-ISSN: 2548-1754. Open Access at: http://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/holrev/ Halu Oleo Law Review is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Perlindungan Hukum Pencipta yang Dirugikan Haknya atas Tindakan Plagiarisme Legal Protection for the Impaired Creator by Plagiarism Act Guswan Hakim Dosen Fakultas Hukum Halu Oleo E-mail: guswan_hakim@yahoo.com Abstract: The purpose of this study is to know about whether the applicable legislation in Indonesia has provided a clear and uniform definition related to the concept of plagiarism in the work of art, literature and scientific papers and Is the applicable legislation in Indonesia at the time, has provided adequate legal protection for the aggrieved creators in the act of plagiarism in works of art, literature and scientific work. This writing uses normative writing method, the approach used in this writing is the approach of the law (Statute Approach). As for the results of the study is the Criminal Code does not recognize the term plagiarism otherwise UUHC does not mention explicitly but plagiarism implied in chapters 41,42,43 and 44 UUHC No. 28 Year 2014 which is called by exceptions and restrictions on copyright, while copyright violations are formulated separately in different articles. UU Sisdiknas calls plagiarism without any further explanation, but states that the act of plagiarism can be used as a basis for uprooting one's academic degree. While Permendiknas Number 17 of 2010 on prevention and prevention of plagiarism in universities has provided clarity on the concept of plagiarism action and prohibited actions. and legal protection on UUHC, UU Sisdiknas and Permendiknas No. 17 Year 2010 is based on 5 parameters, namely the recognition of rights to the creator, the determination of plagiarism as a crime, the formulation of criminal sanctions, the existence of additional criminal sanctions, and dispute resolution mechanism. These parameters have provided legal protection for the most adequate creators. to the perpetrators of plagiarism can be accountable Answer Criminal, Administration and Civil and can be applied to the Institution. Keyword: legal protection, plagiarism, responsibility. Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tentang apakah peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia telah memberikan definisi yang jelas dan seragam berkaitan dengan konsep tindakan plagiarisme dalam karya seni, sastra dan karya ilmiah dan Apakah peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia pada saat ini, telah memberikan perlindungan hukum yang memadai bagi pencipta yang dirugikan dalam tindakan plagiarisme dalam karya seni, sastra