Physico-Chemical Characterizations of Poly(vinylidene fluoride)/
Cu
3
(BTC)
2
Composite Membranes Prepared by In Situ Crystal
Growth
Nadhem Missaoui,
1
Gérald Chaplais ,
2,3
Ludovic Josien,
2,3
Laure Michelin,
2,3
Gautier Schrodj,
2,3
Ayoub Haj Said
1,4
1
Laboratoire des Interfaces et des Matériaux Avancés (LIMA), Faculté des Sciences de Monastir, Université de
Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
2
Institut de Science des Matériaux de Mulhouse (IS2M), Université de Haute-Alsace, CNRS, Mulhouse, 68100, France
3
Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, 67000, France
4
Centre de Recherche en Microélectronique et Nanotechnologie, Technopole de Sousse, Sousse, 4054, Tunisia
In this work, we present a simple and fast method for elab-
orating hybrid membranes by growing metal–organic
framework crystals inside a polymer solution. The solution
thus obtained was casted then annealed at 90
C for 5 h.
This method was tested with poly(vinylidene fluoride)
(PVDF) as a piezoelectric polymer and the Cu
3
(BTC)
2
,
BTC = 1,3,5-benzene tricarboxylate, as a filler. The charac-
terization of the obtained membranes by attenuated total
reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-
ray diffraction showed the presence of the characteristic
signatures of Cu
3
(BTC)
2
and the β-phase of PVDF. More-
over, scanning electron microscopy images reveal that the
Cu
3
(BTC)
2
crystallites have grown along the PVDF mem-
branes. The effect of the filler on both thermal and mechan-
ical properties of the membranes was also studied. POLYM.
ENG. SCI., 00:000–000, 2019. © 2019 Society of Plastics Engineers
INTRODUCTION
Recently, the elaboration of mixed matrix membranes
(MMMs) has sparked increased attention [1]. MMMs consist of a
dispersion of inorganic or inorganic–organic hybrid fillers inside
organic polymers matrices, in such a way that they may combine
the desirable properties of polymer matrices, mainly their excel-
lent mechanical properties and processability, and those of the dis-
persed fillers. Thus, a wide range of fillers have been studied,
such as zeolites [2–5], inorganic oxides [6], fullerenes [7], meso-
porous silicas [8], carbon nano-fibers [9], clays [10], as well as
metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) [11–15] but in a lesser extent
for this last type of materials. Indeed, MOFs, which can be
described as a supramolecular assembly of metal cations (or oxo-
metallic clusters) with organic linkers driven by coordination
bonding, are hybrid porous material possessing very attractive
properties and applications. Actually, MOFs have a relative high
thermal stability, and especially high surface area with customized
pore size and geometry. Moreover, they have extensive applica-
tions including gas storage and separation, catalysis, sensors, and
opto-electronics [16]. In general, solution blending, melt blending,
and in situ polymerization are widely used to achieve the filler
dispersion in the polymer matrix. For the elaboration of an MOF-
based MMM, the MOF is synthesized separately and then dis-
persed in the polymer matrix to form a composite solution and the
MMM is obtained by casting this solution [13–15].
The major barrier for this method is the preparation of well
dispersed fillers at different loading values. This barrier is
governed by different factors such as the chemical composition of
MOFs, their particle size distribution, the interface properties
between the polymer chains and the MOFs particles as well as
their loading ratio. In this paper, we present a simple and fast
method for elaborating hybrid membranes. It consists in growing
MOFs crystals inside a polymer solution. This method was applied
with poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) as polymer matrix, and
Cu
3
(BTC)
2
(also known as HKUST-1) as filler. The choice of
PVDF was encouraged by its ability to form homogenous solution
with metallic salts. In addition, thanks to the outstanding electro-
active properties of its β-phase, PVDF and its membranes are
important materials with extensively technological applications
such as membrane distillation [17] sensors [18, 19], lithium-ion
battery [20–24], energy harvesting [25, 26], and actuators [27, 28].
In fact, PVDF is a semi-crystalline fluoropolymer having differ-
ent crystalline polymorphs namely the α, β, γ, and δ-phases. The
α-phase is the most common form of PVDF. It is non-polar and
non-piezoelectric due to its chain conformation TGTG’ (Trans-
Left–Left-Trans). The phase α has a monoclinic unit cell (P2
1
/c)
with dimensions a = 4.96 Å, b = 9.64 Å, c = 4.62 Å [29]. The
β-phase is the most polar phase due to its conformation all Trans
(TTTT), and it is principally responsible for piezo and pyro-electric
properties of the polymer [30]. The unit cell of the β-phase is ortho-
rhombic (Cm2m) with a = 8.58 Å, b = 4.91 Å, and c = 2.56 Å
[31]. The γ-phase has a chain conformation which is approximately
TTTGTTTG’, with the space group being C2cm [32]. The
obtaining of the β-phase depends on the PVDF processing
(mechanical stretching, solvent-casting, and electrospinning [33])
and the experimental conditions (solvent nature, casting support,
addition of fillers, temperature, and time [34]).
In this work, diverse characterization techniques such as atten-
uated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
(ATR-FTIR), powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron
microscopy (SEM), mercury porosimetry, thermogravimetric anal-
ysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and dynamic
mechanical analysis (DMA) were used to characterize the
obtained MMMs and to assess the effects of the used method of
membrane elaboration.
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this
article.
Correspondence to: H. S. Ayoub; e-mail: ayoub.hajsaid@fsm.rnu.tn
Contract grant sponsor: Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research.
DOI 10.1002/pen.25301
Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).
© 2019 Society of Plastics Engineers
POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—2019