心理学研究 2020 年　第 91 巻 第 3 号　pp. 000－000 研 究 資 料 Methodological Advancement ೔ຊࠃ಺Ͱো֐खாΛॴ࣋Δਓ͸Ճ Γɼฏ੒ 28 年Ͱ͸ 550 ສਓΛ௒Δʢ಺෎ɼ 2019ʣɻதͰɼ೔ຊͰ͸ 2016 年ʹɼো֐ʹ ରΔෆ౰ͳผతѻΛࢭېো֐ผղফ๏ ߦࢪΕΔͱɼো֐ͷجຊతݖརͷอোΛ ໨ࢦऔΓ૊ΈߦΘΕΔɼ൴Β΁ͷผతଶ ౓͸ڧ࢒Δɻࠃ಺ͰߦΘΕௐͰ͸ɼো ֐ɼ心理తഉআ΍ແࢹͷର৅ͱͳΓɼ߈త ෆՄղͳߦಈΛͱΔݥةͳଘࡏͱΈͳΕΓɼ ো֐ΛΔͷ͸ۀಘͱଶ౓Λ޲ΒΕ ΔͱΒʹͳΔʢ܀ɼ 2018; ෢౻ɾఝݪɼ 2015; ٢Ҫɼ2009ʣɻ· 2016 年ʹ͸ɼਆಸ઒ݝ૬໛ ࢢݪͷ஌తো֐෱ࢪࢱઃʹɼଟͷো֐ ࡴইΕΔ௧·ࣄ΋ىΔʢே೔৽ฉऔ ࡐ ൝ɼ2017ʣɻͷΑͳผతଶ౓͸ɼւ֎Ͱ΋޿ Ұൠʹ ݟΒ Ε   ΓʢWatermeyer & Swartz, 2016; Watson, Ottati, & Corrigan, 2003ʣɼো֐ͷݖརΛอো Δ๦ͱͳΔɻো֐ʹରΔผతଶ౓͸ɼ ൴Βͷ߁΍ਓੜຬ଍౓ʹѱӨڹΛ༩ʢRosenfield, 1997; Sampson & Raudenbush, 2004ʣɼଚ心ͷ௿Լ΍ ແ ײͷ  େʢGeis & Ross, 1998; Link, Struening, Neese-Todd, Asmussen, & Phelan, 2001ʣͱਫ਼ਆ త߁ͷѱԽɼΒʹ͸ɼޏ༻΍Ή৔ॴΛબͿجຊ తݖརͷ৵֐ʢWatson et al., 2003ʣʹͳΔͱ ΕΔɻҎͷͱΒɼো֐΁ͷผతଶ ౓ͷಛ௃ΛΒʹΔͱ͸ɼ൴Βͷجຊతݖར ΑͼଚਓΛकΔͰॏཁͰΔɻ ো֐΁ͷผతଶ౓ʹ͸ɼϔΠτεϐʔνͷΑ ʹવͳܗͰදݱΕΔܗଶͷ΋ͷʢݹయతภݟʣ Ͱͳɼ઀తͳܗͰΔΊʹӅΕݟʹ ʮ৅௃తภݟʯଘࡏΔʢKeller & Galgay, 2010ʣɻ 象徴的障害者偏見尺度日本語版（SAS-J）の作成 1, 2 清水 佑輔 ターン 有加里ジェシカ 3 橋本 剛明 4 唐沢 かおり 東京大学 The development of a Japanese Version of the Symbolic Ableism Scale (SAS-J) Yuho Shimizu, Tham Yukari Jessica, Takaaki Hashimoto, and Kaori Karasawa ʢUniversity of Tokyoʣ Handicapped people have faced discriminatory attitudes from the non-handicapped. This often deprives them of fundamental human rights and can exacerbate mental illness. Symbolic ableism is one of the key forms of discrim- inatory attitudes toward the handicapped, and this is regarded as a cause of disagreement with policies to support the handicapped. The propensity of symbolic ableism can be measured by the Symbolic Ableism Scale (SAS; Friedman & Awsumb, 2019), which divides symbolic ableism into four components: individualism, lack of recog- nition of continuing discrimination, lack of empathy for disabled people, and excessive demands. Although this scale is necessary for understanding people’s attitudes toward the handicapped, it is not available in Japanese. This study was conducted to develop a Japanese version of SAS (SAS-J) and examined its reliability and validity. The result showed that SAS-J was divided into two components (i.e., individualism and lack of recognition of current condition), which is different from the original version. We discussed possible explanations of this difference, the reliability and validity of SAS-J, and future directions of symbolic ableism. Key words: symbolic ableism, handicapped people, belief in just world, justice sensitivity, normative attitude to- ward helping. The Japanese Journal of Psychology J-STAGE Advanced published date: October 15, 2021 Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to: Yuho Shimizu, University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113Ȃ0033, Japan. (E-mail: yuhos1120mizu@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp) 1 ຊ研究͸ɼ೔ຊ学ज़ৼڵձՊ学研究අॿʢج൫ Bɼ՝୊ ൪号 20H01752ʣͷॿ੒Λडɻ 2 ຊ研究ͷՌͷҰ෦͸ɼ೔ຊձ心理学ձ第 61 ճେձʹ දΕɻ 3 ೔ຊ学ज़ৼڵձಛผ研究һ 4 ݱॴଐɿ౦༸େ学 心理学研究 2021 年　https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.92.20208