Complete Electrolysis Using a Microflow Cell with an Oil/Water Interface Shigeo Sawada, Masaru Taguma, Takashi Kimoto, Hiroki Hotta, § and Toshiyuki Osakai* Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Kinki University, Higashiosaka, Osaka 577-8502, Japan, Kimoto Electric Company, Ltd., 3-1 Funahashi-cho, Tennoji, Osaka 543-0024, Japan, and Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Kobe University, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan A novel microflow cell with a nitrobenzene (NB)/ water (W) interface was developed. A poly(tetrafluoroethylene) mem- brane filter was employed to prepare the NB/ W interface which was formed over a thin channel (0.1 mm thick, 48 cm long) on a silver plate. The silver plate was electrolyzed in advance and served as an Ag/ AgCl electrode for controlling the Galvani potential difference across the NB/ W interface as well as detecting the current flowing through the interface. Using the microflow cell, complete electrolysis was accomplished for the interfacial transfer of a representative ion (i.e., tetramethylammonium ion). Thus, the present microflow cell was shown to be promis- ing for coulometric (i.e., absolute quantitative) analysis of ions. Also, the microflow cell was shown to be useful for determination of the number of electrons for compli- cated charge-transfer processes at the oil/ water interface. In recent years, much attention has been paid to amperometric (or voltammetric) detection of ions with a liquid/ liquid interface or an oil/ water (O/ W) interface. 1-4 The amperometric detection is based on measurement of ion-transfer current, which is directly proportional to ion concentration and is therefore very suitable for flow injection analysis (FIA). So far, a variety of amperometric flow cells with the O/ W interface have been reported. 5-12 However, they are all designed to detect ion-transfer current due to partial electrolysis of the sample aqueous solution. To the best of our knowledge, there has been reported no O/ W-type flow cell that can accomplish complete electrolysis 13 of the sample solution. If such a flow cell is realized, it will enable us to perform coulometric analysis of ions in a manner similar to conventional flow column electrodes utilizing glassy carbon granules or carbon fiber. 14,15 In this study, we constructed a microflow cell 16,17 using the hydrophobic membrane-stabilized O/ W interface, 18 which is formed over a thin channel (0.1 mm thick, 48 cm long) on a silver plate. By using the microflow cell, we have accomplished complete electrolysis for the interfacial transfer of a representative ion (tetramethylammonium ion, 19 TMA + ). Also, it has been shown that the microflow cell is promising for determination of the number of electrons for heterogeneous electron-transfer reac- tions 20,21 at the O/ W interface. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Chemicals. Tetrabutylammonium tetraphenylborate 19 (TBAT- PB) and tetrapentylammonium tetraphenylborate 22 (TPnATPB) were prepared as described previously. Analytical grade tetrabu- tylammonium chloride (TBACl) or tetrapentylammonium chloride (TPnACl) was occasionally contaminated by a trace amount of * Corresponding author: (e-mail) osakai@ kobe-u.ac.jp. Kinki University. Kimoto Electric Co., Ltd. § Kobe University. (1) Senda, M.; Osakai, T.; Kakutani, T.; Kakiuchi, T. Nippon Kagaku Kaishi 1986 , 956-964. (2) Senda, M.; Kakiuchi, T.; Osakai, T. Electrochim. Acta 1991 , 36, 253-262. (3) Senda, M.; Yamamoto, Y. In Liquid-Liquid Interfaces, Theory and Methods; Volkov, A. G., Deamer, D. W., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1996; Chapter 12. (4) Reymond, F.; Fermı ´n, D.; Lee, H. J.; Girault, H. H. Electrochim. Acta 2000 , 45, 2647-2662. (5) Marecek, V.; Ja ¨ nchenova ´, H.; Colombini, M. P.; Papoff, P. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1987 , 217, 213-219. (6) Ji, H.; Wang, E. Analyst 1988 , 113, 1541-1543. (7) Wang, E.; Ji, H. Electroanalysis 1989 , 1, 75-80. (8) Wang, E.; Ji, H.; Hou, W. Electroanalysis 1991 , 3,1-11. (9) Wilke, S.; Franzke, H.; Mu ¨ ller, H. Anal. Chim. Acta 1992 , 268, 285-292. ( 10) Wilke, S.; Wang, H.; Muraczewska, M.; Mu ¨ ller, H. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1996 , 356, 233-236. ( 11) Lee, H. J.; Girault, H. H. Anal. Chem. 1998 , 70, 4280-4285. ( 12) Sawada, S.; Torii, H.; Osakai, T.; Kimoto, T. Anal. Chem. 1998 , 70, 4286- 4290. ( 13) Although the term “electrolysis” is not very suitable for representing ion- transfer processes at the oil/ water interface, it has been customary to use “electrolysis” even for ion-transfer reactions since 1976, when the late Prof. Koryta published a paper entitled “Electrolysis with an Electrolyte Dropping Electrode” (Koryta, J.; Vanysek, P.; Brezina, M. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1976 , 67, 263-266) . ( 14) Fujinaga, T.; Kihara, S. CRC Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 1977 , 6, 223-254. ( 15) Bard, A. J.; Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical Methods, Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd ed; Wiley: New York, 2001; pp 441-452. ( 16) Maruo, M.; Nakayama, N.; Kamiyama, K.; Kimoto, T. In Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Micro Total Analysis Systems, Analytical Methods and Instrumentation, Special Issue 1996; Widmer, H. M., Ed.; AMI Editorial Office: Basel, Switzerland, 1996; p 233. ( 17) Maruo, M.; Nakayama, E.; Obata, H.; Kamiyama, K.; Kimoto, T. Field Anal. Chem. Technol. 2001 , 5, 29-36. ( 18) Hundhammer, B.; Wilke, S. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1989 , 266, 133-141. ( 19) Kakutani, T.; Osakai, T.; Senda, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1983 , 56, 991- 996. ( 20) Girault, H. H. In Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry; Bockris, J. O’M., Conway, B. E., White, R. E., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, 1993; Vol. 25, Chapter 1. ( 21) Cunnane, V. J.; Murtoma ¨ ki, L. In Liquid-Liquid Interfaces, Theory and Methods; Volkov, A. G., Deamer, D. W., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1996; Chapter 18. ( 22) Osakai, T.; Himeno, S.; Saito, A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1992 , 332, 169- 182. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 1177-1181 10.1021/ac010934l CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 74, No. 5, March 1, 2002 1177 Published on Web 01/15/2002