Safety and Efficacy of Cabozantinib for Metastatic
Nonclear Renal Cell Carcinoma
Real-world Data From an Italian Managed Access Program
Michele Prisciandaro, MD,* Raffaele Ratta, MD,* Francesco Massari, MD,†
Giuseppe Fornarini, MD,‡ Salvatore Caponnetto, MD,§ Roberto Iacovelli, MD,∥
Ugo De Giorgi, MD,¶ Gaetano Facchini, MD,# Sarah Scagliarini, MD,**
Roberto Sabbatini, MD,†† Claudia Caserta, MD,‡‡ Giorgia Peverelli, MD,*
Alessia Mennitto, MD,* Elena Verzoni, MD,* and Giuseppe Procopio, MD*
Objective: The activity of cabozantinib in nonclear cell histologies has
not been evaluated.
Materials and Methods: Data were collected across 24 Italian hospi-
tals. Patients were aged 18 years and older with advanced nonclear cell
renal cell carcinoma (RCC), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology
Group Performance Status 0 to 2, who had relapsed after previous
systemic treatments for metastatic disease. Cabozantinib was adminis-
tered orally at 60 mg once a day in 28 days cycles. Dose reductions to
40 or 20 mg were made due to toxicity. Adverse events (AEs) were
monitored using CTCAE version 4.0.
Results: Seventeen patients were enrolled. Three (18%) patients were
diagnosed type I papillary RCC, 9 (53%) type II papillary, 3 (18%)
chromophobe, and 2 (11%) with Bellini duct carcinoma. In total, 11
patients started with 60 mg. Six patients started a lower dose of 40 mg.
Median progression-free survival was 7.83 months (0.4 to 13.4 mo),
while median overall survival was not reached but 1-year overall sur-
vival was about 60%. Six patients (35%) experienced a partial response
to treatment and 6 patients (35%) showed a stable disease. In the
remaining 5 (30%), we observed a progressive disease. Grade 3 and 4
AEs were observed in 41% of patients. Among 20 patients, only 1 (6%)
discontinued treatment due to AEs. Asthenia (41%), diarrhea (35%),
aminotransferase increasing (35%), mucosal inflammation (35%), hand
and foot syndrome (24%), and hypothyroidism (24%) were the most
frequently AEs.
Conclusions: Our data showed that, cabozantinib is a active and
feasible treatment in patient with nonclear cell RCC.
Key Words: cabozantinib, c-Met, renal cell carcinoma, nonclear cell,
targeted therapy
(Am J Clin Oncol 2019;42:42–45)
R
enal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents the seventh most
common cancer with 330,000 cases diagnosed and
> 140,000 deaths per year worldwide.
1
According to the 2016
World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumours
of the Urinary System, RCC can be divided into different
subtypes on the basis of cytoplasmic (clear cell and chromo-
phobe renal cell carcinomas) or architectural (papillary)
features, anatomic site (renal medullary and collecting duct
carcinomas), pathognomonic molecular alterations (MiT family
translocation carcinomas and succinate dehydrogenase–
deficient renal carcinomas), familial predisposition (hereditary
leiomyomatosis and RCC–associated RCC) and correlation
with other kidney diseases (eg, acquired cystic disease–
associated RCCs). Clear cell RCC is the predominant sub-
type, accounting for 75% of all renal epithelial tumors. All
other histologic subtypes are grouped together as nonclear cell
RCC.
2
Except for collecting duct carcinoma, which seems to be
sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy, metastatic nonclear
cell RCCs are resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy, resulting in
poor patient prognosis.
3
It is well established that tumor angiogenesis represents a
major hallmark in clear cell RCC initiation and progression.
Previous studies have demonstrated that the Von Hippel Lindau
(VHL) protein is frequently dowregulated, leading to the
stabilization of the hypoxia-inducible factors α and β (HIFs)
and the upregulation of several genes such as the vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF), the mesenchymal-epithelial
transition factor (MET), and AXL, frequently associated
with invasive tumor phenotype and poor prognosis.
4–8
VHL
disruption results in highly angiogenic and vascularized tumors
providing the rationale for the development of several agents
such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) directed against the
angiogenic axis, which have demonstrated a significant increase
in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in
the advanced disease and have radically revolutionized the
From the *Department of Medical Oncology, Genitourinary Cancer Unit,
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan; †Division of
Oncology, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna; ‡Medical Oncology
Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino-
IST Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genova; §Department
of Medical Oncology B, Policlinico Umberto I “Sapienza” University of
Rome, Rome; ∥Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Uni-
versitaria Integrata (AOUI), University of Verona, Verona; ¶Department
of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la
Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola; #Department of Uro-
Gynaecological Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Istituto
Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale (IRCCS); **Oncology Unit,
Antonio Cardarelli Hospital, Naples; ††Department of Oncology and
Haematology and Respiratory Disease, University Hospital, Modena;
and ‡‡Oncology Department, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy.
G.P. reports receiving fees for serving on advisory boards from Astellas,
Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer. R.I.
reports receiving fees for serving on advisory boards from Novartis,
Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Ipsen. U.D.G. reports receiving fees
for serving on advisory boards from Janssen, Astellas, Sanofi, Bristol-
Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis and Ipsen. E.V. reports receiving fees for
serving on advisory boards from Ipsen, Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer.
The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Reprints: Michele Prisciandaro, MD, Department of Medical Oncology,
Genitourinary Cancer Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale
Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, Milan 20133, Italy. E-mail: michele.
prisciandaro@istitutotumori.mi.it.
Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
ISSN: 0277-3732/19/4201-0042
DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000478
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
42 | www.amjclinicaloncology.com American Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume 42, Number 1, January 2019
Copyright r 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.