Biogas production from cheese whey wastewater: laboratory- and full-scale studies K. Stamatelatou, N. Giantsiou, V. Diamantis, C. Alexandridis, A. Alexandridis and A. Aivasidis ABSTRACT A two-phase system for biogas production from cheese whey wastewater (CWW) was designed, set up and operated at laboratory and full scale for a whole cheese production season (89 months). The high efciency and stability of the laboratory-scale system was demonstrated under various organic loading rates (OLRs) reaching 13 g chemical oxygen demand (COD) L À1 d À1 and producing up to 9 L L À1 d À1 of biogas (approximately 55% in methane). The COD removal was above 95% and the pH was maintained above 6.3 without any chemical addition. The full-scale system was operated at lower OLRs than its normal capacity, following the good response and high stability in disturbances of the laboratory-scale unit. K. Stamatelatou (corresponding author) N. Giantsiou V. Diamantis A. Aivasidis Department of Environmental Engineering, Laboratory for Wastewater Management and Treatment Technologies, Democritus University of Thrace, Vas. Soas 12, 67100 Xanthi, Greece E-mail: astamat@env.duth.gr N. Giantsiou C. Alexandridis A. Alexandridis Sustainable Engineering Ltd, Thesi Plakoto, P.O. Box 20, 19018 Magoula, Greece Key words | biogas, cheese whey wastewater, full scale, two-phase INTRODUCTION The food industry is a major production sector generating large quantities of wastes. Stabilization of wastes is impera- tive prior to their disposal to the environment according to national legislation of many countries including Greece. In the case of wastes of high organic content, such as food wastes, anaerobic digestion is often the core technology in the treatment scheme. Although the process development aims primarily at meeting the environmental specications for safe waste disposal, provision could be taken to utilize the energy produced in the form of biogas. A typical type of waste produced in agricultural areas of Greece is cheese whey wastewater (CWW) from cheese manufacture. There are numerous and small cheese manu- facturing units scattered in Greece, producing more than 160,000 t of cheese (data for 2007 by Hellenic Statistical Authority, ELSTAT 20092010). There are three main types of CWW depending on the origin of production: from (a) primary cheese, (b) secondary softcheese and (c) washing processes (Prazeres et al. ). The volume of CWW produced is large (2.5 m 3 CWW are produced per ton of milk processed). CWW contains mainly lactose (39 60 g L À1 ) and its chemical oxygen demand (COD) is high (5070 g L À1 ). Other constituents are proteins (1.48gL À1 ) and fats (0.9910.58 g L À1 )(Prazeres et al. ). Anaerobic digestion is an alternative technology to other methods employed in CWW management such as animal feeding, and protein and other compound recovery (Prazeres et al. ). The adoption of these options requires the presence of farmers and industries in the proximity of the cheese manufacturing plant to minimize transport costs. On the other hand, a biogas plant could be installed on-site and the biogas produced could be exploited to cover the thermal or other energy requirements of the cheese manufacturing plant. CWW is rich in lactose, and therefore easily fermentable to acids and subsequently to biogas. The rapid conversion of CWW to acids, however, combined with the low alkalinity of the mixed liquor, causes an abrupt drop in the pH, and the methanogenic population is adversely affected (Kalyuzh- nyi et al. ; Janczukowicz et al. ). As a result, the application of pH control is often regarded as necessary, via addition of chemicals such as lime (Patel & Madamwar ; Gannoun et al. ), sodium hydroxide (Yang et al. ) and bicarbonate salts (Ergüder et al. ; Frigon et al. ). Both single- and multi-stage systems have been studied for CWW treatment. Single-stage bioreactors should operate under high hydraulic retention times (HRTs) and/or require 1320 © IWA Publishing 2014 Water Science & Technology | 69.6 | 2014 doi: 10.2166/wst.2014.029 Downloaded from https://iwaponline.com/wst/article-pdf/69/6/1320/472325/1320.pdf by guest on 14 November 2018