340 cr. Principles, Techniques, and Clinical Applica- tions. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998, pp. 183- 196. 11. LaRoy LL, COimier PJ, Matalon TAS, et al. Imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms. AJR 1989; 152:785-792. 12. Papanicolaou N, Wittenberg J, Ferrucci JT, et al. Preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneu- rysms by computed tomography. AJR 1989; 1986; 146:711-715. 13. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S, Jeffrey RBJ. Three- dimensional cr angiography as an alternative to conventional arteriography in planning and in vivo evaluation of aortic stent grafts. Radiology 1993; 189(P):112. 14. Schwarcz TH, Planigan DP. Repair of abdOminal aortic aneurysms in patients with renal, iliac, or dis- tal arterial occlusive disease. Surg Clin North Am 1989; 69:845-857. 15. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S, Jefferey RBJ. Renal stent position and patency: evaluation with spiral cr angiography. Radiology 1992; 185(P)181. 16. Boijsen E. Angiographic studies of the anatomy of Single and multiple renal arteries. Acta Radiol 1959; 183(Suppl):1-99. 17. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S, et al. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimen- sional rendering techniques. Radiology 1994; 190: 181-189. 18. Prokop M, Schaefer CM, Leppert AGA, Galanski M. Spiral cr angiography of thoracic aorta: femoral or antecubital injection site for intravenous administra- tion of contrast material? Radiology 1993; 189(P) 111. 19. Remy-Jardin M, Remy .I, Wattinne L, Giraud F. Cen- tral pulmonary thromboembolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric cr with the single-breath-hold technique-comparison with pulmonary angiogra- phy. Radiology 1992; 185:381-387. 20. Costello P,Ecker CP, Tello R, Hartnell GG. Assess- ment of the thoracic aorta by spiral cr. AJR 1992; 158:1127-1130. 21. Sommer T, Holzknechnt N, Smekal A, et al. Thin- section spiral cr in the evaluation of aortic dissec- tion: comparison with MR imaging and transesoph- ageal echocardiography. Radiology 1993; 189(P) 112. 22. Prokop M, Schaefer CM, Leppert AGA, Galanski M. Spiral cr angiography for diagnosis and follow-up of chronic aortic dissection. Radiology 1993; 189(P): 112. 23. Costello P, Dupuy DE, Ecker CP, Tello R. Spiral CT of the thorax with reduced volume of contrast ma- terial: a comparative study. Radiology 1992; 183: 663-666. 24. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aOitography. Radiology 1994; 191:155-164. 25. Litt A W, Eidelman EM, Pinto RS, et al. Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of 2DFT time-of- flight MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients. AJNR 1991; 12:149-154. 26. Ecklund K, Hartnell GG, Hughes LA, Stokes KR, Finn JP. MR angiography as the sole method in evaluating abdominal aortic aneurysms: correlation with con- ventional techniques and surgery. Radiology 1994; 192:345. 4:45 pm Renal MR Angiography Martin R. Prince, MD, PhD, Qian Dong, MD, Stefan O. Schoenberg, MD, and Ruth C. Carlos, MD Department of Radiology University of Michigan Medical Center Ann Arbor, Michigan Abstract Renal MR angiography has advanced tremendously in the past several years and it can now accurately evaluate patients suspected of renal artery stenosis. There are many techniques available that proVide information about kidney morphology, renal arterial anatomy, and blood flow. Many of these techniques provide comple- mentary information. This article reviews some of the more common techniques, illustrates how several se- quences can be combined into a comprehensive exam- ination, and presents examples of renal vascular pathol- ogy. Renal artery stenosis is the most common cause of secondary hypertension. When bilateral, renal artery ste- nosis can also cause progressive renal failure. Multiple treatment options, including percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, stenting, or surgical revascularization, may cure renovascular hypertension and preserve renal func- tion. Accordingly, detecting renovascular disease early may prevent the morbidity of hypeltension and renal failure. Renovascular disease is implicated as the underlying cause in approximately 5% of patients with poorly con- trolled hypertension on medical therapy 0,2). 'The inci- dence of renal artery stenosis is higher in selected groups of patients. In a large autopsy study, diabetes mellitus in combination with hypertension had a renal artelY steno- sis incidence of 10% (3). Diabetic patients with renal artery stenosis had bilateral renal artery stenosis 43% of the time. Patients with abdominal aoItic aneurysm had an incidence of 22% (4). Patients with peripheral vascu- lar disease had up to 45% incidence of renal artery stenosis (5). Although using conventional angiography to evaluate renovascular disease is currently the gold standard, it is