Review
Behavioural research priorities for the study of animal response to
climate change
Richard Buchholz
a, b, *
, John D. Banusiewicz
a, 1
, Stephanie Burgess
a
, Sarah Crocker-Buta
a
,
Lauren Eveland
a, 2
, Lauren Fuller
a
a
Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, MS, U.S.A.
b
Center for Biodiversity and Conservation Research, University of Mississippi, University, MS, U.S.A.
article info
Article history:
Received 31 October 2018
Initial acceptance 17 December 2018
Final acceptance 23 January 2019
MS. number: ARV-18-00802
Keywords:
behavioural flexibility
climate change
conservation
evolutionary rescue
plasticity
Behavioural traits are thought to be important determinants of the resilience of animal species to a
rapidly changing global climate. Although increasing temperature has taken centre stage in the debate
over climate change, animals will have to survive more than just extreme heat to persist in the
Anthropocene. The aim of this review is to stimulate interest in the opportunities for integrative and
applied behavioural study of how animals can survive life-threatening weather events, in order to help
achieve the societal goal of maintaining viable wildlife populations under future climate scenarios. First,
using the thermoregulatory behaviour of a hypothetical ground squirrel species as an example, we
explore how different scenarios of behavioural flexibility, plasticity, adaptation, exaptation and man-
agement action can lead to population persistence or extinction. Next, we propose that considering
weather events such as heatwaves, storms and floods, wildfire and drought as selective pressures worthy
of investigation provides a new research framework for climate-related conservation behaviour. In our
review we provide examples of the responses of animals to different types of weather extremes and
describe behavioural adaptations to environments with extreme climates. We give methodological
recommendations to jump start climate change research by behaviourists. Finally, we conclude with
suggestions for using citizen science and a public video repository to foster evidence-based decision
making for managing habitats and prioritizing species conservation efforts in light of the threats to
biodiversity posed by climate change.
© 2019 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
There is a growing consensus among biologists that the
behavioural responses of animals to climate change will be a
deciding factor in predicting species' susceptibility to this threat to
biodiversity (Huey et al., 2012; Mason, Stephens, Apollonio, &
Willis, 2014; Moritz & Agudo, 2013; Mu~ noz, Marquez, & Real,
2015; Sunday et al., 2014). Unfortunately, we know very little
about how individual animals react to acute, extreme weather
events, intraspecific variation in these reactions, the fitness trade-
offs of behavioural responses to weather events and whether
interspecific patterns of behavioural adaptation to stable climates
predict species' resilience to climate change. Surprisingly, dur-
ing two decades of theoretical development in the field of
‘conservation behaviour’ (reviewed by Berger-Tal & Saltz, 2016),
and successful application of behavioural approaches to various
other conservation problems, animal behaviourists have taken little
interest in behavioural change in the context of weather and
climate. This neglect supports the argument that animal behav-
iourists uniquely isolate themselves from mainstream conservation
science (Angeloni, Schlaepfer, Lawler, & Crooks, 2008) and have
been aloof to the dominant interests of conservation biologists
(Caro, 2007). Animal behaviourists must play a larger role in
climate change biology. The future of our discipline is already
threatened by the widespread destruction of natural habitats and
the extirpation of wild species (Caro & Sherman, 2011); Even pre-
viously common species have declined by 50% over the past 40
years (McLellan, Iyengar, Jeffries, & Oerlemans, 2014). To stem
further species' loss and promote a ‘good Anthropocene’ (Madliger
et al., 2017), our science must help society plan for and build spe-
cies' resilience to climate change (Sgr o, Lowe, & Hoffmann, 2011).
Animal behaviourists may be surprised to learn that climate
ecologists have been unsuccessful at predicting the largely
* Correspondence: R. Buchholz, Department of Biology, University of Mississippi,
University, MS 38677-1848, U.S.A.
E-mail address: byrb@olemiss.edu (R. Buchholz).
1
J. D. Banusiewicz is nowat 36901 County Rd 507, Apt 138, Itta Bena, MS 38941,
U.S.A.
2
L. Eveland is now at 2120 El Paseo St Apt 207, Houston, TX 77054, U.S.A.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Animal Behaviour
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.02.005
0003-3472/© 2019 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Animal Behaviour 150 (2019) 127e137