Vol.:(0123456789) 1 3
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (2020) 42:363
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02449-5
TECHNICAL PAPER
Efect of surface topography on pull‑out strength of cortical screw
after ultrasonic bone drilling: an in vitro study
Raj Agarwal
1
· Vivek Jain
1
· Vishal Gupta
1
· Sanjai Saxena
2
· Vagish Dwibedi
2
Received: 29 January 2020 / Accepted: 1 June 2020
© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2020
Abstract
Drilling of bone is required to repair and align the bone when faced with a major fracture. The screw and implant are used
for fxing the fractured part of the bone. The failure of osteosynthesis is due to strength between the bone and screw, which
majorly depends upon the pull-out strength of the cortical screw. Pull-out strength is the force required to pull a screw out
of its foundation from the bone. After the fxation of cortical screws, the major forces acting on the fxation of the screw and
the implanted device in the bone. Therefore, it needs to make sure that the screw must ft into the place and grasp the bone
within the drilled hole. The intended focus of this research is to see the efect of surface roughness induced during the bone
drilling operation on pull-out strength with rotary ultrasonic bone drilling (RUBD) and standard conventional bone drilling
(CBD). This is observed that a drilled hole in a bone exhibits greater pull-out strength with more surface roughness because
more anchoring is provided by the roughened surface. Also, the apatite formation of the bone shows the biocompatible nature
of porcine bone in the simulated body fuid (SBF) solution. RUBD using diferent grit size in a hollow drilling burr resulted
that coarse abrasive have maximum efort for higher surface roughness. Furthermore, the higher surface texture provides a
better bone growth rate as it provides peaks for branching and nucleation when preserved in SBF. RUBD provides precise
cutting to the bone as compared to CBD. On the 28th day of the bone-screw samples to be immersed in SBF results 42.82%
higher pull-out strength of screw in case of RUBD as compared to CBD.
Keywords Rotary ultrasonic bone drilling · Surface roughness · Microcracks · SBF · Pull-out strength
1 Introduction
From ancient civilization, human bones need rehabilita-
tion and repair when faced with major damage or accident
to any body part. Bone fracture is a major health concern
and a very common problem faced by living being due to
aging, accidents and stressed fracture. Above 20% of ath-
letes sufer from stress fractures [1]. During fracture, bone
breaks or does not align with each other. For the treatment of
bone fracture, most of the orthopedic surgeries are based on
bone drilling for fxing plates and implants with the cortical
screws. The success of implant depends upon the stability
and sustainability of screws [2]. Implant failure and aseptic
loosening of the cortical screw are usual problems faced by
orthopedic surgeons due to less stability between the bone
and cortical screw [2, 3]. This stability of cortical screw is
owing to high temperature and causes failure of joint pros-
theses [2]. It has been reported that the implant failure rate is
around 2.1–7.1% [4]. Primary stability of implant afects the
strength, rigidity, and resistance to movement of the implant
before tissue healing [5]. There could be many reasons for
implant failure like occlusal overload, wear or corrosion,
fbrous encapsulation, infammation, fracture of implants
due to mechanical failure, lack of initial implant stability,
mismatch in modulus of elasticity between bone and implant
which leads to revision surgery [6, 7].
Technical Editor: Adriano Almeida Gonçalves Siqueira.
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this
article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02449-5) contains
supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
* Vishal Gupta
vishal.gupta@thapar.edu
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Thapar Institute
of Engineering and Technology, Patiala 147004, Punjab,
India
2
Department of Biotechnology, Thapar Institute
of Engineering and Technology, Patiala 147004, Punjab,
India