corneal edema. The corneal edema was thought to be secondary to amantadine toxicity. Interventions: N/A. Main Outcome Measure(s): The time frame of amantadine use prior to onset of visual symptoms varies between reports but ranges from 15 days to 8 years. (7) Most case reports show resolution of the corneal edema after cessation of amantadine with the recovery time spanning from 8 days to 2 months.(7) Our patient had resolution of corneal edema within two months following cessation of amantadine, but with persistently low endothelial cells density at that time. Results: Amantadine is used frequently in the brain injury population and yet ocular side effects are absent in the brain injury literature. Perhaps the ocular side effects are masked in brain injury patients due to cortical visual impairments (or perception of visual impairment) or poor cognition, misdiagnosed. Conclusion/Discussion: N/A. Key Words: Amantadine, Corneal Edema, Brain Injury Disclosures: None. Research Poster 289969 An Exploration of Resource Facilitation Services for Veterans With Traumatic Brain Injury Christina Dillahunt-Aspillaga (University of South Florida, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, Rehabilitation and Mental Health Counseling Program), Gail Powell-Cope, Jessica Yanson Research Objectives: To report preliminary findings describing: (1) types of resource facilitation (RF) services provided within the Veterans Health Administration (James A. Haley (JAH) VA Hospital, Tampa, FL) and number of referrals made to community-based RF programs, and (2) civilian RF services being delivered to Veterans with TBI (VTBI) by community-based RF program providers. Design: Quality improvement survey. Setting: Online survey. Participants: The convenience sample includes VA (NZ10) and civilian (NZ10) RF providers. VA providers included polytrauma case managers at the JAH polytrauma rehabilitation centers, polytrauma support clinic teams, social workers, VA care coordinators, and vocational rehabilitation staff who provide care and support to VTBI. Civilian RF providers included state Brain Injury Association of Florida RF providers who provide services to VTBI. Interventions: N/A. Main Outcome Measure(s): Type and number of RF services delivered to VTBI. Results: Preliminary results indicated that VA Providers need additional supports to refer VTBI to non-medical community based services; pro- viders had difficulty identifying available services in patients’ geographic areas. VA providers reported that information is needed about community based services, acceptance criteria, and how RF programs link with the VA. Civilian RF providers experienced barriers and challenges with providing RF services to VTBI, and reported needing training to learn about VA resources and services. They reported a desire to establish better working relationships with the VA to provide RF services. According to civilian RF providers, the most common RF services requested by VTBI were referral to support groups, medical services, mental health services, financial support, resources for behavioral issues, socialization, family and community reintegration, housing/homeless shelters, day programs, volunteer and employment support programs. Conclusion/Discussion: Findings suggest that Veteran and Civilian pro- viders’ desire increased RF collaboration to support Veteran community reintegration. Key Words: Brain Injuries, Community Integration, Veterans Disclosures: None. Research Poster 304181 Analysis of Exercise Programs in Assisted Living Facilities e A Cross-sectional Study Hao Liu (the 2nd affiliated hospital of Nanchang University, Physical Therapy Department University of North Texas Health Science Center), Howe Liu, Xiao Bao Research Objectives: To describe the characteristics of exercise programs in assisted living facilities. Design: A cross-sectional description study. Setting: Twelve assisted living facilities in south central US area. Participants: Sixty-five years and older, able to walk to the activity room with or without an ambulatory device, and able to follow two- step commands. Interventions: The data collected included number and demographics of participants and activity directors as well as exercise characteristics. Main Outcome Measure(s): The characteristics of exercise programs including type/mode, intensity, duration, and frequency. Results: Among 216 subjects (9 to 29 in each of these ALFs) who participated in the study, 55% of them used assistive devices including walkers or canes. The activity directors’ year of experience is from 2-12 years and their education background vary from liberal arts to science. Seated exercises were provided in all 12 facilities, but 4/12 also had additional standing exercise activities. The exercise programs included range of motion exercise only (6/12) or combined with resistance training (6/12). The exercise parameters were: 3-5/week, 30-45 minutes/session, 1- 2 sets of 10-20 repetitions for each exercise. Exercise precautions were stressed in 4 facilities by activity directors. However, no facility had emphasized exercise precaution and quality movement of each exercise (defined as “true completion of full range of motion for each exer- cise movement”). Conclusion/Discussion: The exercises programs predominantly were low intensity chair exercises including flexibility with or without light resis- tance training. The selection of exercise and parameters are affected by the activity director’s year of experience and education background. Training and re-training of activity directors may be needed to ensure quality ex- ercises to be provided. Key Words: Aged, Assisted Living Facilities, Exercise Programs Disclosures: Nothing to disclose. Research Poster 295509 Applicability of Mobility Disability Scale in Community Dwelling Individuals Manikandan Natarajan (School Of Allied Health Sciences), K.B. Kumar, B. Rajashekhar Research Objectives: To determine the applicability of newly developed mobility disability scale (MDS) in community dwelling individuals with different impairments. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Patients’ houses in semi urban community. Participants: 510 community dwelling individuals with different impair- ments were screened based on the selection criteria. Demographic charac- teristics of the selected patients were measured followed by the assessment using MDS for all the items. The item scores were added to calculate the individual domain scores and the total scores of MDS. Applicability of the scale was evaluated by identifying the average number of items scored in the scale, the type and severity of mobility disability based on age, gender and conditions. Descriptive statistics was used for all the analysis. Interventions: Not Applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s): Frequency, domain and total scores of MDS. e32 Research Posters www.archives-pmr.org