Remarkable Conformational Control of Photoinduced Charge Separation and Recombination in a Giant U-Shaped Tetrad Toby D. M. Bell, † Katrina A. Jolliffe, ‡ Kenneth P. Ghiggino,* ,† Anna M. Oliver, ‡ Michael J. Shephard, ‡ Steven J. Langford, ‡ and Michael N. Paddon-Row* ,‡ Contribution from the School of Chemistry, The UniVersity of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia, and School of Chemistry, The UniVersity of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia ReceiVed April 28, 2000. ReVised Manuscript ReceiVed August 3, 2000 Abstract: Intramolecular photoinduced electron transfer (ET) with rates greater than 2 × 10 9 s -1 has been observed in polar solvents for the U-shaped, syn,syn isomer (syn,syn-4) of a giant tetrad with porphyrin and methyl viologen termini (4). In contrast, no ET is observed in a sample containing the extended isomers anti,syn and anti,anti of 4. Photoexcitation of the syn,syn isomer and subsequent ET leads to the formation of the charge-separated state which has an unusually long lifetime of 420 ns in acetonitrile and 230 ns in benzonitrile. Temperature-dependent fluorescence lifetime studies of syn,syn-4 revealed the presence of a small (0.09 eV) activation barrier for the ET process and they indicate the presence of two ground-state conformers, one where the terminal porphyrin and methyl viologen chromophores are located close enough to facilitate ET and one where they are not. The experimental data and theoretical calculations support the proposal that ET occurs by a direct through-space process and that the observed slow charge recombination arises from an increase in the separation of the terminal chromophores due to electrostatic repulsion between the porphyrin and methyl viologen radical cations. Introduction The synthesis and study of multichromophoric structures containing electron donor (D) and acceptor (A) species has contributed much to the fundamental understanding of photo- induced electron transfer (ET) processes. By careful design of such systems, key issues in ET can be singled out for study. 1-4 For example, the covalent attachment of chromophores to rigid bridges has provided valuable insight into the dependence of ET dynamics on the nature of D and A 5-8 and their relative separation and orientation. 9-11 More recently, multichro- mophoric systems of the type 1, in which more than two redox centers are connected in series by rigid bridges, are being studied with the prime aim of generating long-lived charge-separated (CS) states with high efficiency. 12-15 These types of systems are also being used to probe other aspects of ET, such as superexchange 16-19 mechanisms and solvent-mediated ET processes. 20-22 Recently, our group has investigated multichromophoric systems, of the general structure depicted by 2, based on the † The University of Melbourne. ‡ The University of New South Wales. (1) Paddon-Row, M. N. Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 18-25. (2) Gust, D.; Moore, T. A.; Moore, A. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 198-205. (3) Wasielewski, M. R. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92, 435-461. (4) Closs, G. L.; Miller, J. R. Science 1988, 240, 440-447. (5) Williams, R. M.; Koeberg, M.; Lawson, J. M.; An, Y. Z.; Rubin, Y.; Paddon-Row, M. N.; Verhoeven, J. W. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 5055- 5062. (6) Roest, M. R.; Verhoeven, J. W.; Schuddeboom, W.; Warman, J. M.; Lawson, J. M.; Paddon-Row, M. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1762- 1768. (7) Roest, M. R.; Oliver, A. M.; Paddon-Row, M. N.; Verhoeven, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 4867-4871. (8) Bell, T. D. M.; Smith, T. A.; Ghiggino, K. P.; Ranasinghe, M. G.; Shephard, M. J.; Paddon-Row, M. N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 268, 223- 228. (9) Lawson, J. M.; Paddon-Row, M. N.; Schuddeboom, W.; Warman, J. M.; Clayton, A. H. A.; Ghiggino, K. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 13099- 13106. (10) Clayton, A. H. A.; Ghiggino, K. P.; Lawson, J. M.; Paddon-Row, M. N. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1994, 80, 323-331. (11) Ghiggino, K. P.; Clayton, A. H. A.; Lawson, J. M.; Paddon-Row, M. N. New J. Chem. 1996, 20, 853-859. (12) Kuciauskas, D.; Liddell, P. A.; Hung, S. C.; Lin, S.; Stone, S.; Seely, G. R.; Moore, A. L.; Moore, T. A.; Gust, D. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 429-440. (13) Gust, D.; Moore, T. A.; Moore, A. L.; Macpherson, A. N.; Lopez, A.; Degraziano, J. M.; Gouni, I.; Bittersmann, E.; Seely, G. R.; Gao, F.; Nieman, R. A.; Ma, X. C. C.; Demanche, L. J.; Hung, S. C.; Luttrull, D. K.; Lee, S. J.; Kerrigan, P. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11141-11152. (14) Imahori, H.; Yamada, K.; Hasegawa, M.; Taniguchi, S.; Okada, T.; Sakata, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2626-2629. (15) Liddell, P. A.; Kuciauskas, D.; Sumida, J. P.; Nash, B.; Nguyen, D.; Moore, A. L.; Moore, T. A.; Gust, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1400-1405. (16) Wasielewski, M. R.; Gaines, G. L.; Wiederrecht, G. P.; Svec, W. A.; Niemczyk, M. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10442-10443. (17) Wasielewski, M. R.; Niemczyk, M. P.; Johnson, D. G.; Svec, W. A.; Minsek, D. W. Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 4785-4806. (18) Osuka, A.; Marumo, S.; Mataga, N.; Taniguchi, S.; Okada, T.; Yamazaki, I.; Nishimura, Y.; Ohno, T.; Nozaki, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 155-168. (19) Osuka, A.; Yamada, H.; Maruyama, K.; Mataga, N.; Asahi, T.; Ohkouchi, M.; Okada, T.; Yamazaki, I.; Nishimura, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9439-9452. (20) Reek, J. N.; Rowan, A. E.; de Gelder, R.; Beurskens, P. T.; Crossley, M. J.; de Feyter, S.; de Schryver, F.; Nolte, R. J. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 361-363. (21) Hunter, C. A.; Hyde, R. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1936-1939. (22) Degraziano, J. M.; Macpherson, A. N.; Liddell, P. A.; Noss, L.; Sumida, J. P.; Seely, G. R.; Lewis, J. E.; Moore, A. L.; Moore, T. A.; Gust, D. New J. Chem. 1996, 20, 839-851. 10661 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10661-10666 10.1021/ja001492i CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society Published on Web 10/18/2000