Sulfur-Substrate Interactions in Spontaneously Formed Sulfur Adlayers on Au(111) C. Vericat, M. E. Vela, G. Andreasen, and R. C. Salvarezza Instituto de Investigaciones Fisicoquı ´micas Teo ´ ricas y Aplicadas (INIFTA), (CIC-CONICET-UNLP), Sucursal 4, Casilla de Correo 16, 1900 La Plata, Argentina L. Va ´zquez and J. A. Martı ´n-Gago* Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (CSIC), 28049-Madrid, Spain Received December 30, 2000. In Final Form: April 3, 2001 The electroadsorption of S on Au(111) from 0.1 M NaOH + 3 × 10 -3 M Na2S solutions has been studied by in situ scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), electrochemical methods, and ex situ X-ray photoemission spectrocopy (XPS). By analyzing STM images, we have observed that S adsorbs on Au(111) forming a 3×3R30° superstructure. Under potential control this lattice slowly and continuously transforms into S octomers (S8) in the range -0.7/-0.5 V (i.e., at typical potentials observed under open circuit conditions). In this potential range, mixtures of both structures are present on the Au(111) surface. An XPS study of the S 2p peak from the adlayers reveals the presence of three components that can be assigned to S forming a 3×3R30° structure, S8, and bulk S at surface defects. The most important component is that corresponding to S8, in good agreement with the STM images. Furthermore, XPS spectra recorded for 3×3R30° thiol adlayers on Au(111), characterized by STM and atomic force microscopy, lead to similar S 2p XPS spectra. A comparison between these cases allows us to conclude that S in spontaneously formed S8 on Au(111) exhibits the same binding energy of the core electronic levels (i.e., same chemical state) as S in 3×3R30° spontaneously formed thiol lattices, although the adsorption sites are different. Introduction Self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of alkanethiols on metals have attracted considerable scientific interest. 1 These fascinating two-dimensional structures have po- tential applications to modify wetting and wear properties of solid surfaces and to anchor different functional groups to be used in chemical and biochemical sensors. Also, they can be used to protect metal surfaces against corrosion and to be used as masks for the fabrication of nanodevices for electronics and magnetic storage media. 2 One of the main problems in understanding self-assembly of SAMs on metals arises from the fact that alkanethiol-metal and alkanethiol-alkanethiol interactions are not fully understood. These interactions determine the stability of SAMs, a crucial point for their use in many technological applications. In aqueous solutions, the most important environment for technological applications, reductive electrodesorption has been used to explore SAM stability. 3 In fact, SAMs on Ag(111) 4 and Au(111) 5 are desorbed in sharp voltammetric peaks whose peak potentials (E p ) shift in the negative direction as the length (n) of the alkanethiol hydrocarbon chains, given in C units, increases. Based on the shift in E p , stabilizing forces acting in 3×3R30° and related superlattices of alkanethiols adsorbed on Au(111) and Ag(111) in contact with aqueous solutions have been estimated in 3-4 kJ/mol C units. 4,5 This energy involves van der Waals and hydrophobic forces, both stabilizing SAMs. Conversely to this progress in the understanding of the lateral interactions prevailing in SAMs, the nature of the S-Au bond is not fully understood. In fact, although the chemical state of S atoms at the alkanethiol/Au interface has been extensively studied by XPS, the interpretation of experimental data still remains contro- versial. 6-10 Recently, the behavior of electroreductive desorption curves for 3×3R30° alkanethiol adlayers (and its c(4×2) superlattice), recorded in aqueous 0.1 M NaOH, has been compared to that found for similar S adlayers. 11 It has been found that the E p vs n plot leads to a value for n ) 0, i.e., alkanethiols adsorbed on Au in the absence of chain-chain interactions, 0.2 V positively shifted with respect to the E p value for S electroreductive desorption. This is a strong indication that the S-Au bond in 3×3R30° alkanethiol adlayers differs from the S-Au bond in 3×3R30° S lattices. In this paper we investigate the nature of the S-Au bond for both spontaneously formed S and alkanethiol adlayers using in situ scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), ex situ atomic force microscopy (AFM), and photoemission experiments. We have found that the spontaneously formed S adlayer on Au consists mainly of S 8 coexisting with 3×3R30° domains and bulk S. We * Corresponding author. (1) Ulman, A. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 1533. (2) Haag, R.; Rampi, A. M.; Holmlin, R. E.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7895. (3) Widrig, C. A.; Chung, C.; Porter, M. D. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1991, 310, 335. (4) Hatchett D. W.; Uibel, R. H.; Stevenson, K.J.; Harris, J.M.; White, H. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1062. (5) Zhong, C-J.; Porter, M. D. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1997, 425, 147. (6) Heiser, K.; Allara, D. L.; Bahnck, K.; Frey, S.; Zharnikov, M.; Grunze, M. Langmuir 1999, 15, 5440. Whelan, C. M.; Barnes, C. J.; Walker, C. G. H.; Brown, N. M. D. Surf. Sci. 1999, 425, 195. (7) Castner, D.; Hinds, K.; Grainger, D. W. Langmuir 1996, 12, 5083. (8) Ishida, T.; Hara, M.; Kojima, I.; Tsuneda, S.; Nishida, N.; Sasabe, H.; Knoll, W. Langmuir 1998, 14, 2092. (9) Zhong, C.-J.; Brush, R. C.; Anderegg, J.; Porter, M. D. Langmuir 1999, 15, 518. (10) Ishida, T.; Choi, N.; Mizutani, W.; Tokumoto, H.; Kojima, I.; Azehara, H.; Hokari, H.; Akiba, U.; Fujihira, M. Langmuir 1999, 15, 6799. (11) Vela, M. E.; Martin, H.; Vericat, C.; Andreasen, G.; Herna ´ ndez Creus, A.; Salvarezza, R. C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 11878. 4919 Langmuir 2001, 17, 4919-4924 10.1021/la0018179 CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society Published on Web 07/10/2001