US CLIVAR VARIATIONS US CLIVAR VARIATIONS • Summer 2015 • Vol. 13, No. 3 15 Pan, Y. H., and A. H. Oort, 1983: Global climate variations connected with sea surface temperature anomalies in the eastern equatorial Pacifc Ocean for the 1958–73 period. Mon. Wea. Rev., 111, 1244– 1258, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1983)111<1244:GCVCWS>2.0.CO;2. Power, S., T. Casey, C. Folland, A. Colman, and V. Mehta, 1999: Inter- decadal modulation of the impact of ENSO on Australia. Climate Dyn., 15, 319–324, doi:10.1007/s003820050284. Reynolds, R. W., N. A. Rayner, T. M. Smith, D. C. Stokes, and W. Wang, 2002: An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. J. Climate, 15, 1609–1625, doi: 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1609:AIISAS>2.0.CO;2. Risbey, J. S., S. Lewandowsky, C. Langlais, D. P. Monselesan, T. J. O’Kane, and N. Oreskes, 2014: Well-estimated global surface warming in climate projections selected for ENSO phase. Nat. Climate Change, 4, 835–840, doi:10.1038/nclimate2310. Santer, B. D., and Coauthors, 2014: Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in tropospheric temperature. Nat. Geosci., 7, 185–189, doi:10.1038/ngeo2098. Schmidt, G. A., D. T. Shindell, and K. Tsigaridis, 2014: Reconciling warming trends. Nat. Geosci., 7, 158–160, doi:10.1038/ngeo2105. Stocker, T. F., and Coauthors, 2013: Technical Summary. Climate Change 2013: Te Physical Science Basis. Stocker, T. F. et al. Eds., Cambridge University Press, 33–115. Tokinaga, H., and S.-P. Xie, 2011: Wave- and anemometer-based sea surface wind (WASWind) for climate change analysis. J. Climate, 24, 267–285, doi:10.1175/2010JCLI3789.1. Trenberth, K. E., J. T. Fasullo, G. Branstator, and A. S. Phillips, 2014: Seasonal aspects of the recent pause in surface warming. Nat. Climate Change, 4, 911–916, doi:10.1038/nclimate2341. Urabe, Y., and S. Maeda, 2014: Te relationship between Japan's recent temperature and decadal variability. Sci. Online Lett. Atmos., 10, 176–179, doi:10.2151/sola.2014-037. Watanabe, M., H. Shiogama, H. Tatebe, M. Hayashi, M. Ishii, and M. Kimoto, 2014: Contribution of natural decadal variability to global warming acceleration and hiatus. Nat. Climate Change, 4, 893–897, doi:10.1038/nclimate2355. Xie P, and P. A. Arkin, 1997: Global precipitation: A 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates and numerical model outputs. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 2539–2558, doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<2539:GPAYMA>2.0.CO;2. Zhang, Y., J. M. Wallace, and D. S. Battisti, 1997: ENSO-like interdecadal variability: 1900-93. J. Climate, 10, 1004–1020, doi:10.1175/1520- 0442(1997)010<1004:ELIV>2.0.CO;2. Warming the abyss: The deep ocean's contribution to global warming Sarah Purkey 1 , Damien Desbruyères 2 , and Nathalie Zilberman 3 1 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University 2 National Oceanography Centre, United Kingdom 3 Scripps Institution of Oceanography T he rate of increase of the global mean surface temperature has shown a high level of variability despite a steady increase in greenhouse gases, including periods of zero or relatively low warming, ofen referred to as a warming “hiatus” (e.g., Trenberth and Fasullo 2010; Foster and Rahmstorf 2011). During the hiatus periods the top of the atmosphere radiative imbalance has remained at roughly 1 W m -2 . Tis suggests that either the observational record of surface temperature is incorrect owing to under sampling or data corrections or the heat is accumulating in other parts of the climate system, raising the question of where this excess heat is going (Trenberth et al. 2009; Karl et al. 2015; Kosaka and Xie 2013). In order to address this question and quantify the planetary heat gain, it is necessary to monitor all sinks of energy within the Earth’s climate system. Atmospheric warming only accounts for roughly 1% of the excess radiative heat gain, with the vast majority, approximately 93%, absorbed by the global oceans and the remaining 6% accounted for by warming land and melting ice (Rhien et al. 2013). Despite the large role the ocean plays in absorbing the excess heat, much of it remains unmonitored, and historical estimates of ocean heat content are mostly limited to the upper 700 m. Since the early 2000s, the Argo array has revolutionized ocean monitoring above 2000 m, however, the deep