Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 68, No. 1, 2012, pp. 28--45 Group Dominance and the Half-Blindness of Privilege Felicia Pratto ∗ and Andrew L. Stewart University of Connecticut Two psychological reasons that powerful groups are socially privileged are (1) powerful groups are culturally and mentally normalized, which disguises their privilege as “normal” while highlighting inferiority and stereotypes about other groups, and (2) affiliating with own-groups and promoting their power are more psychologically compatible for dominant groups than for subordinated groups. Prior research concerning social categories defined by gender, sexual orientation, nationality, and race is summarized to illustrate how social category norms focus people’s attention away from powerful groups and their privileges. The present research shows that, for race, gender, class, and sexual orientation in the U.S., own group membership is more salient, and works less well in promoting own group power and group dominance for members of subordinated than of domi- nant groups. Implications for why group privilege is not mutually recognized by dominant and subordinated groups, and for how this may translate into support for different social policies are discussed. People—and even researchers—refer to groups whose identities are prob- lematized and whose social positions are problematic as “underprivileged,” “dis- advantaged,” “stigmatized,” or, rarely, “oppressed.” Contrasting groups are rarely described—let alone in the terms that designate their superior social position— as privileged, advantaged, legitimate, or oppressor. This practice of marking the “problematic” group reveals that the unmarked situation of dominant groups is assumed to be normal. Such a stance is only half-blind concerning group priv- ilege, because although it focuses attention on “problematic” groups and may ∗ Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Dr. Felicia Pratto, Depart- ment of Psychology, University of Connecticut, 406 Babbidge Road, Storrs, CT 06269–1020 [e-mail:felicia.pratto@uconn.edu]. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant DGE-0753455 awarded to the second author. The authors thank Tom Wood for writing the email survey program used to collect Samples 5 and 6, Paddy McGowan for creating the email sample used for Sample 7, Dr. Peter M. Smith for technical support, and Jim Sidanius for sharing the data from Samples 1 and 3. 28 C  2012 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues