Copyright © 2016 Mutaz B. Habal, MD. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Assessment of the Postoperative Stability of Mandibular
Orthognathic Surgery for Correction of Class III
Skeletal Malocclusion
Giuliano Henrique Mia ˜o Luchi, PhD,
Ricardo Augusto Conci, PhD,
y
Flavio Henrique Silveira Tomazi, MSc,
z
Rosana da Silva Berticelli, PhD,
§
Michel Martins Guarenti, MSc,
Guilherme Genehr Fritscher, PhD,
z
and Cla ´iton Heitz, PhD
z
Abstract: To assess the stability of mandible position after orthog-
nathic surgery for correction of class III skeletal malocclusion.
Twenty adult males, aged 18 to 40 years, with Angle class III
skeletal malocclusion underwent preoperative orthodontic treat-
ment for elimination of dental compensations followed by com-
bined maxillomandibular surgery with rigid internal fixation.
Lateral cephalograms from each patient, obtained in the natural
head position before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at 6-
month follow-up, were retrieved from the files of the Pontifical
Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul outpatient Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery clinic and compared. Comparison of cranio-
metric landmark measurements showed that the precision of man-
dibular setback was compromised in the horizontal plane, with a
mean mandibular relapse of 37.75% at point B and 45.85% at point
Pg. Improved intercuspation and adaptation of the musculature to
the new position of the jaws after orthognathic surgery lead to
counterclockwise rotation of the mandible, ultimately displacing
the mandible more anteriorly than desired.
Key Words: Class III skeletal malocclusion, lateral cephalograms,
orthognathic surgery
(J Craniofac Surg 2017;28: 151–156)
O
rthognathic surgery is increasingly recognized as a safe
procedure with predictable outcomes. Improvement of oper-
ative techniques, development of new fixation devices, and deter-
mination of normal standards of facial anatomy using numerical
data have minimized postoperative relapse issues and made orthog-
nathic surgery a viable adjunct for the correction of dentofacial
deformities in adults.
1–7
One of the various skeletal deformities in which surgical ortho-
dontic intervention is indicated is class III skeletal malocclusion,
which may be due to maxillary retrusion, mandibular protrusion, or
a combination of both, and jeopardized facial harmony and sto-
matognathic function.
8,9
Integrating adequate preoperative plan-
ning, precise orthodontic preparation, planned osteotomies, and
aesthetic plastic surgery techniques, orthognathic surgery is a
corrective cosmetic procedure that can provide normal occlusion
and restore a pleasing balance of facial harmony.
9
The accuracy of
this procedure is ensured by a protocol that consists of several
technical steps performed prior to the actual surgery and should be
followed in each patient.
4–6
Now, as patients secure ever greater
access to this therapeutic option for the correction of malocclusions
(including class III patients),
5
the present study was designed to
assess the stability of mandibular positioning after orthognathic
surgery through an analysis of lateral cephalograms obtained
immediately before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at 6-
month follow-up.
METHODS
Approval for the study was obtained from the Pontifical Catholic
University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS) Research Ethics Com-
mittee (judgment no. 990/11). The authors have also read the
Helsinki Declaration and have followed its guidelines in this
investigation. Patient data were used in accordance with Brazilian
Ministry of Health regulations as set forth in National Health
Council Resolution 196/96 of October 10, 1996.
The study sample comprised 20 adult males with Angle class III
skeletal malocclusion, aged 18 to 40 years, recruited from the
outpatient clinic of the PUCRS Graduate Program in Oral and
Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology (FO/PUCRS). Patients
were included in the study only if they had no local or systemic
contraindications to orthognathic surgery.
Patients with craniofacial deformities or syndromes were
excluded from the study, as were those with cleft lip or palate.
All patients underwent adequate orthodontic care preoperatively (to
ensure proper alignment of the dental arches and eliminate any
dental compensation, improving the position of the teeth within the
bone) and postoperatively (to refine the occlusal result). Surgical
treatment consisted of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for man-
dibular setback, followed by rigid internal fixation with three 2.0-
mm bicortical screws, and Le Fort I osteotomy of the maxilla
followed by 2.0-mm miniplate fixation with monocortical screws at
the canine and zygomatic buttresses. All patients were operated on
by the same team of surgeons.
Lateral cephalograms were obtained preoperatively (T0),
immediately after the procedure (T1), and at least 6 months after
surgery (T2). The mean length of follow-up was 27 months (range,
5–63 months). All cephalograms were obtained at the FO/PUCRS
Radiology Service using a Siemens Orthophos CD (serial no.
From the
Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, Grupo Hospitalar
Conceic ¸a ˜o, Porto Alegre;
y
Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, State
University of West Parana, Cascavel;
z
Post-Graduate Program in Den-
tistry, Pontifı ´cia Universidade Cato ´ lica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS),
Porto Alegre; and
§
Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry, State University
of West Parana, Cascavel, Brazil.
Received May 19, 2016.
Accepted for publication September 16, 2016.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Ricardo Augusto Conci,
PhD, Universitaria Street, 1619, Jardim Universitario, 85819-110.
Cascavel, PR, Brazil; E-mail: ricardo_conci@hotmail.com
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Copyright
#
2016 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD
ISSN: 1049-2275
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003311
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume 28, Number 1, January 2017 151