Length of Stay and ICU Stay Are Increased With Repair of Traumatic Superior Mesenteric Vein Injury Joseph Sabat, MD, PhD, a, * Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, PhD, a Navdeep Samra, MD, b Quyen Chu, MD, b Craig Weinkauf, MD, PhD, a Kaoru Goshima, MD, a Wei Zhou, MD, a and Tze-Woei Tan, MD a a University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona b Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana article info Article history: Received 8 October 2018 Received in revised form 1 March 2019 Accepted 9 April 2019 Available online xxx Keywords: Trauma Superior mesenteric vein Vascular trauma Vascular surgery abstract Background: Traumatic superior mesenteric vein (SMV) injury is rare, and the ideal treat- ment is controversial. We compared the outcomes of ligation versus repair of SMV injury using the National Trauma Databank. Materials and methods: All adult patients who suffered from traumatic SMV injury were identified from the National Trauma Databank (2002-2014) by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Patients were stratified by treatment modality into no repair, ligation, and surgical repair using ICD procedure codes. Patient characteristics were compared between ligation and surgical repair groups using the KruskaleWallis test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Outcomes, including mortality, rates of small bowel resection, length of stay (LOS), and ventilation days were compared using logistic regression. Results: Among 952 patients with SMV injury, 192 patients (20.2%) had ligation, 428 (50%) underwent surgical repair, and 332 patients (34.9%) had neither repair nor ligation of the SMV. Overall hospital mortality was 32%. Age, gender, injury severity score (ISS), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) were similar between groups that underwent ligation and surgical repair. Although the mortality rate (29.4% versus 36.5%, P ¼ 0.20) and bowel resection rate (4% versus 3%, P ¼ 0.12) were similar, patients who underwent repair had significantly longer hospital LOS (19.4  24.8 versus15.2  24.4 d, P < 0.001) and ICU LOS (13  17.1 versus 9.3  11.8 d, P ¼ 0.02) compared to ligation. Similar results were observed in multivariable analysis when adjusted for race, associated vascular injuries, and other associated injuries. Conclusions: In patients with traumatic SMV injury, surgical repair does not appear to confer a significant survival advantage over ligation and can be associated with greater LOS and ICU LOS. Ligation may be an acceptable option for management of a traumatic SMV injury, especially when surgical repair cannot be performed, without compromising patient mortality or bowel resection rates. ª 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This manuscript was presented at the 13th Annual Academic Surgical Congress on January 30, 2018 in Jacksonville, Florida. * Corresponding author. University of Arizona College of Medicine, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, Room 4402, Tucson, AZ 85724. Tel.: þ520-626-6670; fax: þ520 626-4008. E-mail address: joseph.sabat@gmail.com (J. Sabat). Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.JournalofSurgicalResearch.com journal of surgical research  october 2019 (242) 94 e99 0022-4804/$ e see front matter ª 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.043