Promoter Hypermethylation of RASSF1A in Esophageal Squamous
Cell Carcinoma
1
Tamotsu Kuroki, Francesco Trapasso,
Sai Yendamuri, Ayumi Matsuyama,
Hansjuerg Alder, Masaki Mori, and
Carlo M. Croce
2
Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania 19107 [T. K., F. T., S. Y., A. M., H. A.,
C. M. C.], and Department of Surgery, Medical Institute of
Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Beppu 874-0838, Japan [M. M.]
ABSTRACT
Purpose: The RAS association domain family 1A
(RASSF1A) gene, a candidate tumor suppressor gene, is
frequently inactivated by hypermethylation of its promoter
region in several human cancers. The aim of this study was
to evaluate the promoter methylation status of the
RASSF1A in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Experimental Design: We analyzed the methylation sta-
tus of RASSF1A promoter by methylation-specific PCR in
23 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines and 48
primary tumors.
Results: Hypermethylation of RASSF1A was found in
74% of cell lines and 52% of primary tumors. The presence
of hypermethylation was statistically associated with loss of
RASSF1A mRNA expression in both cell lines (P 0.007)
and primary tumors (P 0.003). There was a statistically
significant correlation between the presence of hypermethy-
lation and tumor stage (P 0.009).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that epigenetic si-
lencing of RASSF1A gene expression by promoter hyper-
methylation could play an important role in primary esoph-
ageal squamous cell carcinogenesis.
INTRODUCTION
The genesis of human cancers, including those of the
esophagus, is a multistep process involving cumulative genetic
alterations that include activation of oncogenes or inactivation
of tumor suppressor genes. Although multiple genetic and epi-
genetic changes have been detected in esophageal squamous cell
carcinoma (1–3), the precise molecular mechanisms of devel-
opment and/or progression of esophageal squamous cell carci-
noma still remain unknown.
Examples of genetic alterations involving homozygous de-
letions and LOH
3
of chromosome 3p have been reported in
many different human tumors, including esophageal cancer (4,
5). The fragile histidine triad gene, located at 3p14.2, is a tumor
suppressor gene that is predominantly altered by deletions, and
it plays an important role in the development of esophageal
cancers with exposure to environmental carcinogens (1, 6, 7).
LOH analyses revealed that 3p21.3 is another region commonly
deleted in several cancers (8, 9). Furthermore, we recently
reported abnormalities in the WWOX gene, a putative tumor
suppressor gene, involving LOH and point mutation (3). Re-
cently, RASSF1A has been proposed as a candidate tumor
suppressor gene, isolated within the minimal homozygous de-
letion at 3p21.3 in lung cancer (10). Recent studies have shown
that the hypermethylation of CpG island into regulatory se-
quences is another mechanism that could account for silencing
genes involved in cancer (11–13). The most recurrent mecha-
nism of inactivation of RASSF1A is the hypermethylation of a
CpG island in its promoter sequences as reported in lung, breast,
prostate, and kidney cancers (14 –16). To investigate whether
the promoter hypermethylation of RASSF1A could play a role
in human esophageal tumorigenesis, we performed a MSP on
esophageal primary tumors and cell lines. We investigated the
frequency and potential clinical implications of hypermethyla-
tion of RASSF1A promoter in human esophageal squamous cell
carcinomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell Lines and Tissues. Twenty-three human esopha-
geal carcinoma cell lines and 13 TE series were provided by the
Cell Resource Center for Biomedical Research Institute of De-
velopment, Aging and Cancer at Tohoku University (Tohoku,
Japan), and 10 KYSE series were gifts from Dr. Shimada of
Kyoto University (Kyoto, Japan). The tumor samples and their
corresponding noncancerous tissues were obtained from 48 Jap-
anese patients who underwent surgery for esophageal squamous
cell carcinoma (45 male and 3 female; median age, 60.7 years;
range, 48 –74 years). Four of them were stage I, 5 were stage II,
37 were stage III, and 2 were stage IV, according to the Tumor-
Node-Metastasis classification.
DNA and RNA Extraction. The tissue samples were
excised and immediately stored at -80°C. DNA and RNA were
Received 9/12/02; revised 12/3/02; accepted 12/5/02.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked
advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to
indicate this fact.
1
Supported by USPHS Grants CA39860, CA56036, CA77738, and
CA83698 from the National Cancer Institute.
2
To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Kimmel Cancer
Institute, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University,
BLSB Room 1050, 233S 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107-5799.
Phone: (215) 503-4645; Fax: (215) 923-3528; E-mail:carlo.croce@mail.
tju.edu.
3
The abbreviations used are: LOH, loss of heterozygosity; RASSF1A,
RAS association domain family 1A; MSP, methylation-specific PCR;
RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phos-
phate dehydrogenase.
1441 Vol. 9, 1441–1445, April 2003 Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Research.
on December 11, 2021. © 2003 American Association for clincancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from