M. Brambilla, T. Hildebrandt (Eds.): BPMN 2017 Industrial Track Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org, 2017. Copyright © 2017 for the individual papers by the papers' authors. Copying permitted for private and academic purposes. This volume is published and copyrighted by its editors. Business Process Context for Message Standards Nenad Ivezic 1,* , Miroslav Ljubicic 1 , Marija Jankovic 1 , Boonserm Kulvatunyou 1 , Scott Nieman 2 , and Garret Minakawa 3 1 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA {nivezic,miroslav.ljubicic,marija.jankovic,serm}@nist.gov 2 Land O’Lakes, Shoreview, MN, USA stnieman@landolakes.com 3 Oracle, Redwood City, CA, USA garret.minakawa@oracle.com Abstract. Despite unrelenting increase in complexity of message standards for enterprise systems integrations, there are no effective means to address this complexity issue in practice. We describe an effort to address the issue by advancing message standards development and use methods. The new effort relies on business process model life-cycle management, which is essential for context definition of message standards usage. Context is essential as it describes the intent for the message standards usage in a specific systems integration case. We report results of a preliminary assessment of the approach for an industry use case. Keywords: systems integration. message standards. life-cycle management. business process model. context 1 Introduction Efficient, practical, systems integration continues to be a great challenge for enterprises of all sizes, in great part because of the increasing complexities of message standards for the integration. The Open Applications Group, Inc. (OAGi) is one of the original consortia that standardize message-exchange standards [1]. Without a means to manage a shareable context specification, OAGi members have seen the message standards becoming complex and their management unwieldy. Business processes are prime candidate to supply context specification for the messages involved in information exchanges. This has been recognized for many decades, starting with the activity modeling language IDEF0 where inputs and outputs capture the business data to be exchanged between activities [2]. The OAGi consortium has taken first steps to offer BPMN-based standards for business processes to provide precise context for message exchanges [3]. Recently, BPMN 2.0, with its BPMN.xsd representation and runtime execution capability, has accelerated the design, development, and implementation of message