Low-lying magnetic excitations in Ni 3 Al and their suppression by a magnetic field Anita Semwal and S. N. Kaul* School of Physics, University of Hyderabad, Central University P.O., Hyderabad 500 046, Andhra Pradesh, India Received 3 May 1999; revised manuscript received 21 July 1999 Results of high-resolution magnetization Mmeasurements performed on well-characterized polycrystalline Ni 3 Al sample over wide ranges of temperature and external magnetic field are presented and discussed in the light of existing theoretical models. Contrary to the earlier claims that either Stoner single-particle excitations or nonpropagating spin fluctuations solely determine the temperature dependence of spontaneous magnetiza- tion M ( T ,0), at low temperatures, we find that propagating transverse spin-density fluctuations spin waves almost entirely account for the thermal demagnetization of both M ( T ,0) and ‘‘in-field’’ magnetization M ( T , H), at temperatures T 0.28T C ( T C =Curie point. The spin-wave stiffness possesses a field-independent value of 69.6(14) meV Å 2 which conforms well with those determined earlier from small-angle and inelastic neutron-scattering experiments. In the temperature range 0.32T C T 0.92T C , enhanced nonpropagating spin- density fluctuations SFgive a contribution to M ( T ,0) and M ( T , H) that completely overshadows the one arising from spin waves. In accordance with the predictions of a modified spin-fluctuation theory, proposed by the authors recently, the thermally excited SF’s get strongly suppressed by magnetic field H while the zero- point SF’s are relatively insensitive to H. S0163-18299901142-X I. INTRODUCTION Out of the intermetallic compounds that exhibit weak itinerant-electron ferromagnetism, ordered cubic L 1 2 crystal structureNi 3 Al has captured maximum experimental and theoretical attention during the past three decades, and yet certain aspects of magnetism in this compound have eluded a complete understanding so far. One such aspect pertains to the nature of low-lying magnetic excitations. Magnetic prop- erties of Ni 3 Al have been extensively studied 1–11 and the results discussed in the light of either Stoner-Wohlfarth 1–8,12,13 model or the spin fluctuation model. 9–23 On the one hand, de Boer and co-workers 1,2,4 claim that the temperature dependence of spontaneous mag- netization M ( T ,0) in the temperature interval 0.1T C T 0.75T C ( T C = Curie pointis very well described by the expression M ( T ,0) = M (0,0) -aT 2 yielded by the Stoner- Wohlfarth model, 12,13 which holds the Stoner single-particle spin-flip excitations solely responsible for the thermal de- magnetization of M ( T ,0). On the other hand, Sasakura, Su- zuki, and Masuda 10 assert that M ( T ,0) follows the relations M 2 ( T ,0) = M 2 (0,0) -a ' T 2 and M 2 ( T ,0) =a ( T C 4/3 -T 4/3 ), predicted by the spin-fluctuation SFmodel, 14–21 in the tem- perature ranges 0.1T C T 0.4T C and 0.42T C T T C , re- spectively. According to the SF model, nonpropagating ther- mally excited longitudinal and transverse spin-density fluctuations completely account for the decline of spontane- ous magnetization with increasing temperature. In conflict with both the above-mentioned observations concerning the actual functional form of M ( T ,0), small-angle neutron-scattering 24 SANSand inelastic neutron- scattering 25 INSexperiments provide direct evidence for well-defined spin-wave excitations i.e., for propagating ther- mally excited transverse spin-density fluctuationsin Ni 3 Al at temperatures in the range 0.1T C T 0.8T C . Though the existence of spin waves at low temperatures in itinerant- electron magnetic systems has been recognized 26 for a long time now, no indication for such excitations in Ni 3 Al has been found to date from magnetization measurements. The spin-fluctuation SFtheories henceforth referred to as conventional SF theoriesproposed hitherto are, to some extent, limited in scope in that they are unable to clarify the role of zero-point quantumspin fluctuations and fail to yield an expression which quantifies the suppression of local spin-density fluctuations by external magnetic field H ext . Obviously, the theoretical limitations of this kind seriously hamper the understanding of magnetism in weak itinerant- electron WIferromagnets such as Ni 3 Al. Recently, Kaul and co-workers 27,28 have addressed these deficiencies of the conventional SF theories from the theoretical point of view and remedied them by a self-consistent treatment of the SF model, which makes use of the Ginzburg-Landau formalism. Kaul and co-workers 27,28 have explicitly calculated the zero- point ZPand thermally excited TEcontributions to spin fluctuations in WI ferromagnets in the presence and absence of H ext and the results briefly summarized in the next sec- tion; the details are given in Ref. 28demonstrate the follow- ing. ZP spin fluctuations ihave a major share in renormal- izing the Landau coefficients of the Stoner-Wohlfarth theory, iiare relatively insensitive to H ext , and iiimake an ap- preciable contribution to the temperature dependence of magnetization. By contrast, TE collective electron-hole pair excitations almost entirely account for the dependences of magnetization on temperature and field, and get strongly sup- pressed by H ext . In addition, this theoretical approach 27,28 for the first time, yields an analytical expression for the sup- pression of TE spin fluctuations by magnetic field for tem- peratures just outside the critical region but below the Curie point T C . Extensive high-resolution bulk magnetization measure- ments were undertaken on well-characterized Ni 3 Al sample with a view to resolve the controversy surrounding the nature of low-lying magnetic excitations and to test the validity of PHYSICAL REVIEW B 1 NOVEMBER 1999-II VOLUME 60, NUMBER 18 PRB 60 0163-1829/99/6018/1279911/$15.00 12 799 ©1999 The American Physical Society