AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect Shaken Baby Syndrome: Rotational Cranial Injuries—Technical Report ABSTRACT. Shaken baby syndrome is a serious and clearly definable form of child abuse. It results from extreme rotational cranial acceleration induced by vio- lent shaking or shaking/impact, which would be easily recognizable by others as dangerous. More resources should be devoted to prevention of this and other forms of child abuse. ABBREVIATIONS. CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging. INTRODUCTION P hysical abuse is the leading cause of serious head injury in infants. 1,2 Although physical abuse in the past has been a diagnosis of ex- clusion, data regarding the nature and frequency of head trauma consistently support the need for a presumption of child abuse when a child younger than 1 year has suffered an intracranial injury. 1,2 Shaken baby syndrome is a serious form of child maltreatment most often involving children younger than 2 years but may be seen in children up to 5 years old. 2–5 It occurs commonly, yet may be misdiagnosed in its most subtle form and underdiagnosed in its most serious form. 6 Caretakers may misrepresent or claim to have no knowledge of the cause of the brain injury. Caretakers who are not responsible for the injuries may not know how they occurred. Externally visible injuries are often absent. Given possible dif- ficulties in initially identifying an infant as having been abusively shaken and the variability of the syn- drome itself, physicians must be extremely vigilant when dealing with any brain trauma in infants and be familiar with radiologic and clinical findings that support the diagnosis of shaken baby syndrome. HISTORY In 1972, pediatric radiologist John Caffey 7 popu- larized the term “whiplash shaken baby syndrome” to describe a constellation of clinical findings in in- fants, which included retinal hemorrhages, subdural and/or subarachnoid hemorrhages, and little or no evidence of external cranial trauma. One year earlier, Guthkelch 8 had postulated that whiplash forces caused subdural hematomas by tearing cortical bridging veins. In the mid-1970s, computed tomog- raphy (CT) began to be used to help with diagnosis. The advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the mid-1980s has furthered the diagnostic capabili- ties. 9 ETIOLOGY The act of shaking leading to shaken baby syn- drome is so violent that individuals observing it would recognize it as dangerous and likely to kill the child. Shaken baby syndrome injuries are the result of violent trauma. The constellation of these injuries does not occur with short falls, seizures, or as a consequence of vaccination. Shaking by itself may cause serious or fatal injuries. 10,11 In many instances, there may be other forms of head trauma, including impact injuries. 10 –12 Thus, the term shaken/slam syndrome (or shaken-impact syndrome) may more accurately reflect the age range of the victims (who are not always babies) and the mechanisms of injury seen. Such shaking often results from tension and frustration generated by a baby’s crying or irritabil- ity, yet crying is not a legal justification for such violence. 13 Caretakers at risk for abusive behavior generally have unrealistic expectations of their chil- dren and may exhibit a role reversal whereby care- takers expect their needs to be met by the child. 14 Additionally, parents who are experiencing stress as a result of environmental, social, biological, or financial situations may also be more prone to im- pulsive and aggressive behavior. Those involved with domestic violence and/or substance abuse may also be at higher risk of inflicting shaken baby syn- drome. Small children are particularly vulnerable to such abuse because of the large disparity in size between them and an adult-sized perpetrator. EPIDEMIOLOGY Head injuries are the leading cause of traumatic death and the leading cause of child abuse fatalities. Homicide is the leading cause of injury-related deaths in infants younger than 4 years. 2 Serious in- juries in infants, particularly those that result in death, are rarely accidental unless there is another clear explanation, such as trauma from a motor ve- hicle crash. Billmire and Meyers 15 found that when uncomplicated documented severe trauma such as that resulting in skull fractures were excluded, 95% of serious intracranial injuries and 64% of all head injuries in infants younger than 1 year were attribut- able to child abuse. Bruce and Zimmerman 5 docu- mented that 80% of deaths from head trauma in infants and children younger than 2 years were the result of nonaccidental trauma. Contrary to early The recommendations in this statement do not indicate an exclusive course of treatment or serve as a standard of medical care. Variations, taking into account individual circumstances, may be appropriate. PEDIATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright © 2001 by the American Acad- emy of Pediatrics. 206 PEDIATRICS Vol. 108 No. 1 July 2001 by guest on April 13, 2017 Downloaded from