Immunophenotyping and Cellular Immune Responses of Cadaveric
Donor Bone Marrow Cells
M.R. Carreno, V. Esquenazi, C. Gomez, R. Garcia-Morales, J. Mathew, R. Cirocco, A. Alamo,
H. Gharagozloo, K. Zucker, C. Ricordi, L. Fuller, A. Tzakis, and J. Miller
H
UMAN vertebral bone marrow cells have been shown
to be a source of hematopoietic progenitors and cells
with regulatory function.
1
These cells have also been used
clinically in perioperative infusions in organ transplantation
to induce a microchimeric state and possibly tolerance.
2,3
We have found that donor bone marrow cells (DBMC)
contain several phenotypically distinct cell populations that
negatively regulate CTL and MLC immune responses of
recipient cells toward donor cells.
4
The present study
further extends these in vitro observations on the respond-
ing and regulatory functions of purified subpopulations of
DBMC analyzed by flow cytometry, also addressing the
question of whether immunosuppressive agents would alter
these functions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The analysis of DBMC preparations
5
included cluster analysis and
epitope quantitation using molecules of equivalent soluble fluoro-
chrome (MESF) to discriminate between dimly and brightly stain-
ing cells. Murine monoclonal antibodies (MAb) to human CD3,
CD4, CD8, TCR (), CD19, CD34, CD38, CD33, CD45, CD56/
16, and HLA-Drw in three or four fluorochrome combinations
were used to analyze samples of 15,000 gated cells in a FACS-
caliber flow cytometer.
In vitro culture systems comparing cadaveric organ DBMC and
individual bone marrow cell subsets vs spleen cells were tested in
the presence or absence of pharmacologic immunosuppressive
agents. This was done to analyze the possible immunologic re-
sponding and regulatory properties of human bone marrow cell
infusions in clinical organ transplantation.
Bone marrow cells were isolated from human cadaveric donor
vertebral bodies as described previously.
6
Briefly, after thorough
washing, the vertebral bodies were crushed and single cell suspen-
sions were made.
The Macs cell separation system (Miltenyi Biotech Inc, Auburn,
Calif) was used. The CD34+ and CD34- cells were prepared using
the CD34 isolation kit according to the manufacturer’s method.
Similarly, T cells were depleted or enriched by E-rosetting, de-
scribed previously,
7
or by using anti-CD3 coated microbeads with
the Macs system, following the instructions for positive and nega-
tive selection. Flow cytometry using appropriate MAbs showed that
the negatively or positively selected populations were depleted to
0.0% to 0.2% or enriched to 49.2% to 98.0% of cells expressing the
target epitope, respectively (vide infra). These cells were then used
in the in vitro assays.
RESULTS
The CD3+ cells made up 19% of the total cells, and 6%
were CD34+. The CD3 cells were distributed into different
subpopulations, predominated by CD8+ cells. The relative
number of CD3 molecules on DBMC, as assessed by
MESF, were significantly lower when compared to autolo-
gous peripheral blood T cells. The double CD4-CD8- and
the double CD4+CD8+ cells, composed of about one third
of the total bone marrow T cells, had lower numbers of
CD3 molecules than the single CD4+ or CD8+ cells. Thus,
in their phenotypic characterization, the predominant pro-
portion of T cells in the marrow appeared to be different
from those of the peripheral circulation. In 7-day cultures of
CD34+ cells, the predominant cell populations remaining
were CD33+ when unstimulated and CD38+ lymphoid
precursors when stimulated with irradiated allogenic cells.
In the latter cultures, there was also a fivefold increase in
the number of CD3+ cells.
CONCLUSIONS
Taken together, these results support the notion that in
vitro DBMC subpopulations proliferate as responding cells
in coculture with x-irradiated allogenic cells and cause
regulatory effects when added as a third component to
MLC reactions. They appear to be culture-generated lym-
phoid cell lineage(s) progeny of CD34+ cells, possibly
including unique CD3+ “primitive” (dimly staining) T cells,
which are not as inhibited in their function by tacrolimus/
cyclosporine (CyA) and MPA as are postthymic (splenic) T
cells.
REFERENCES
1. Wood ML, Orosz CG, et al: Transplantation 54:665,
1992
From the Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Miami,
Florida.
Address reprint requests to Dr V. Esquenazi, Medical Sci Bldg
Rm 8160, 1600 N.W. 10th Ave, Miami, FL 33136.
© 1998 by Elsevier Science Inc. 0041-1345/98/$19.00
655 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010 PII S0041-1345(98)00024-4
Transplantation Proceedings, 30, 727–728 (1998) 727