Modeling people with motor disabilities to empower the automatic
accessibility and ergonomic assessment of new products
Nikolaos Kaklanis, Georgios Stavropoulos, Dimitrios Tzovaras
*
Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 6th Klm. Charilaou e Thermi Road, P.O. BOX 60361, GR-570 01, Thessaloniki,
Greece
article info
Article history:
Received 11 September 2013
Accepted 27 April 2015
Available online 20 May 2015
Keywords:
User modeling
Virtual User Model
Regression analysis
abstract
Virtual User Models (VUMs) can be a valuable tool for accessibility and ergonomic evaluation of designs
in simulation environments. As increasing the accessibility of a design is usually translated into addi-
tional costs and increased development time, the need for specifying the percentage of population for
which the design will be accessible is crucial. This paper addresses the development of VUMs repre-
senting specific groups of people with disabilities. In order to create such VUMs, we need to know the
functional limitations, i.e. disability parameters, caused by each disability and their variability over the
population. Measurements were obtained from 90 subjects with motor disabilities and were analyzed
using both parametric and nonparametric regression methods as well as a proposed hybrid regression
method able to handle small sample sizes. Validation results showed that in most cases the proposed
regression analysis can produce valid estimations on the variability of each disability parameter.
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
It is important to realize that people with disabilities are not a
tiny minority of the population. Around 640 million people
worldwide live with a disability (Enable, 2008). Many strategies
have been undertaken worldwide to enforce accessibility for peo-
ple with disabilities. For instance, the European Commission has
launched a number of initiatives (Klironomos et al., 2006; Bühler
and Stephanidis, 2004), such as the eEurope 2002, the eEurope
2005, the EDeAN network and the DfA@eInclusion Coordination
Action (
Sim sík and Galajdov a, 2008) to promote the “Design For All”
(DfA) principles that will lead to more accessible services and
systems. The Commission has also advocated the use of standard-
ization to improve the effectiveness and uptake of DfA. It mandated
CEN, CENELEC and ETSI to include the “Design for All” concept in
relevant standardization initiatives. Digital Human Modeling
(DHM) can significantly support designers and developers on
staying compliant with the aforementioned strategies, as it reduces
the need for physical prototypes, and also enables the incorpora-
tion of ergonomics science and human factors engineering princi-
ples earlier in the design process.
DHM and simulation has gained importance in the past few
years (Phillips and Badler, 1988; van der Meulen and Seidl, 2007;
Porter et al., 2004; Lind et al., 2008; Feyen et al., 2000) and al-
lows designers to easily observe and evaluate the interaction of the
designed product with a virtual user having specific needs and/or
preferences. Simulation offers designers the opportunity to explore
how a new system would behave before the real prototype is
developed, or how an existing system would perform if altered,
thus, reducing development time and costs. Moreover, there are
cases where simulation is the only method of verifying that a
design concept is acceptable to a prescribed population, since
hardware prototypes are not available (Chaffin, 2001).
The core concept of this paper is to empower the accessibility
and ergonomics of new products by introducing a novel user
modeling technique for people with disabilities, based on statistical
analysis. The main goal of the paper is the development of accurate
Virtual User Models (VUMs) representing specific disabled popu-
lation groups. Measurements were initially obtained from a total of
90 subjects having the following disabilities: Parkinson's disease,
stroke, multiple sclerosis and cerebral palsy. Statistical analysis was
performed on these measurements using both parametric and
nonparametric regression analysis, as well as a proposed hybrid
regression method able to handle small sample sizes by using both
real and virtual samples along with information found in the
literature. The accuracy and validity of the final regression results
* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ30 2311 257777; fax: þ30 2310 474128.
E-mail addresses: nkak@iti.gr (N. Kaklanis), stavrop@iti.gr (G. Stavropoulos),
Dimitrios.Tzovaras@iti.gr (D. Tzovaras).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Applied Ergonomics
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apergo
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.04.016
0003-6870/© 2015 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
Applied Ergonomics 51 (2015) 120e136