Ecological Modelling 149 (2002) 85 – 95
An approach to evaluate the effect of property size on
land-use options in semi-arid rangelands
K.W. Tomlinson
a,
*, J.W. Hearne
a
, R.R. Alexander
b
a
School of Mathematics, Statistics and Information Technology, Uniersity of Natal, Priate Bag X01,
Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa
b
Department of Applied and International Economics, Massey Uniersity, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Abstract
It is claimed that high returns can be achieved from hunting and ecotourism operations. As a result wildlife
production is a rapidly growing form of land-use in South Africa. Lately, rural African communities have approached
regional conservation agencies for aid to establish small game reserves so that they too may benefit from wildlife
production. However, wildlife operations have high input costs relative to domestic stock operations and no attempt
has been made to determine the effect of property size on the costs and revenue generated by wildlife. This paper
attempts to develop a method for identifying the relevant economic variables of wildlife production, subsistence
production and commercial beef production and the revenues that these separate land-uses generate. Thence to
observe their relationship with property size by means of an illustrative example. In this way the size ranges for which
each of the three land-uses is most appropriate can be determined. Finally, the method is evaluated against the results
of the example to identify future refinement. The results of this example indicate that the profit curve of wildlife rises
far more steeply than those of either subsistence production or commercial beef production. However, due to the
effect of high input costs associated with wildlife, both commercial and subsistence beef production are more
profitable at small land sizes. This indicates that investing large sums of money into small game reserves of the order
of 3000 ha or less may not be justified on the basis of profits alone. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Economies of scale; Wildlife production; Livestock production; Savannah land-use
www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolmodel
1. Introduction
Originally, conservation areas were established
with little or no regard for local people. The
management strategy was preservationist and em-
phasised a planning role aimed at excluding local
people (Wells et al., 1992). The theme of protect-
ing natural phenomena from exploitation for pub-
lic enjoyment served as the model for
development of protected areas worldwide (Mach-
lis and Tichnell, 1985). Communities next to these
reserves frequently bore substantial costs as a
result of lost access to wildlife, vegetation and
water resources, for which they received little
compensation (Cumming, 1993). Local communi-
ties tended to be poor and as such perceived the
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +27-33-260-5645; fax: +27-
33-260-5648.
E-mail address: tomlinsonk@nu.ac.za (K.W. Tomlinson).
0304-3800/02/$ - see front matter © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII:S0304-3800(01)00516-6