264
ISSN 0026-2617, Microbiology, 2017, Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 264–275. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2017.
Diversity of Bacterial Communities Inhabiting Soil and Groundwater
of Arsenic Contaminated Areas in West Bengal, India
1
S. Paul
a
, Md. N. Ali
a, b,
*, S. Chakraborty
c
, and S. Mukherjee
a
a
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty Centre for Integrated Rural Development and Management, Ramakrishna
Mission Vivekananda University
b
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya
c
Department of Soil Sc. and Agril. Chem, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya
*e-mail: nasimali2007@gmail.com
Received June 1, 2016
AbstractSoil and water contaminated with arsenic (As) through natural or anthropogenic inputs are com-
monly considered as native source of tolerant bacterial strains. The present study was successful in character-
izing 12 hyper-tolerant bacteria, satisfying maximum tolerable concentration (MTC) for arsenate (As
5+
) ≥
300 mM and arsenite (As
3+
) ≥ 30 mM, isolated from As affected North 24 Parganas and South 24 Parganas
districts of West Bengal, India. Most of the bacteria showing higher level of tolerance to As
5+
and As
3+
were
found as gram-positive and bacilli in shape. Positive responses to different biochemical tests indicated that
some of these bacteria could be potent sources of various biotechnologically important enzymes. Some of the
hyper-tolerant bacteria could reduce As
5+
to As
3+
while all others could oxidise As
3+
to As
5+
. Phylogenetic
analysis revealed that those hyper-tolerant bacterial strains were distributed among three phyla such as Acti-
nobacteria, Firmicutes, and γ-Proteobacteria. The Firmicutes were well represented in this study with more
than half of the hyper-tolerant strains corresponding to members of this group. Moreover, majority of the iso-
lates except SR10 belonging to this phylum were affiliated to different species of the genus Bacillus and
showed different tolerance capability to As
3+
and As
5+
. We present the first report of the genus Paenibacillus
as being involved in arsenite oxidation with hyper-tolerance property to As. Four isolates named as SDe5,
SDe12, SDe13, and SDe15 belonging to genera Bacillus and Rhodococcus exhibited highest tolerance to As
and therefore represented as good candidates for bioremediation processes of native polluted soil and ground
water.
Keywords: arsenic, hyper-tolerant bacteria, biochemical characterization, phylogenetic analysis
DOI: 10.1134/S0026261717020151
The health status of South-East Asian countries is
getting severely affected by soil and groundwater arse-
nic (As) contamination since few decades (Mukherjee
et al., 2006). Among As-affected countries, India
ranks second after Bangladesh (Chakraborti et al.,
2009). In recent past, the several areas of India, partic-
ularly West Bengal, being As contaminated, received
global attention (Chakraborti et al., 2004). Conse-
quently, the sufferings from As induced toxicity such
as skin lesion (Saha, 1984; GuhaMazumder, 1998;
Chakraborti, 2002), lung cancer (GuhaMazumder,
1998), liver cancer (Santra et al., 1999), gastrointesti-
nal and cardiovascular diseases (Ahmad et al., 1997;
Rahman et al., 1999) etc. have been increased by many
folds. This toxic metalloid naturally exists in both
organic and inorganic forms with the predominant
oxidation states being –3, +3 or +5 (Cullen and
Reimer, 1989). Arsenite (As
3+
) is generally considered
as more toxic than arsenate (As
5+
) due to its relatively
higher solubility and mobility (Rhine et al., 2006),
higher affinity for protein thiols (Kostal et al., 2004)
and inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation (Goyer
and Clarkson, 2001).
Now a day, in situ or ex situ As remediation using
potential microbes, called bioremediation, has gained
increased concern in comparison to conventional
physico-chemical treatments (Zouboulis and Katsoy-
iannis, 2005) due to its ecofriendly and economic
approach of management. Bacterial bioremediation
became persuasive alternative as bacteria have evolved
certain mechanisms either to combat As-induced tox-
icity (Bhattacharjee and Rosen, 2007) or even to get
benefits from As exposure (Jackson et al., 2003). They
utilize As in their metabolism either generating energy
through chemoautotrophic As
3+
oxidation (Santini
et al., 2000) or using As
5+
as a terminal electron accep-
tor in an aerobic respiration (Ahmann et al., 1994).
The survival strategies under metal stressed condition
1
The article is published in the original.
EXPERIMENTAL ARTICLES