Thermochimica Acta 433 (2005) 187–195
Clay intercalation and influence on crystallinity of
EVA-based clay nanocomposites
D.S. Chaudhary, R. Prasad, R.K. Gupta, S.N. Bhattacharya
∗
Rheology and Materials Processing Centre, School of Civil and Chemical Engineering, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe St., Melbourne 3000, Australia
Received 7 December 2004; received in revised form 4 February 2005; accepted 14 February 2005
Available online 26 April 2005
Abstract
Various polymer clay nanocomposites (PCNs) were prepared from ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) with 9, 18 and 28% vinyl acetate
(VA) content filled with different wt.% (2.5, 5 and 7.5) of a Montmorillonite-based organo-modified clay (Cloisite
®
C15A and C30B). The
PCNs were prepared using melt blending techniques. Morphological information regarding intercalation and exfoliation were determined by
using wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). WAXS and TEM confirmed that increasing the VA
content was necessary to achieve greater clay–polymer interaction as seen from the comparatively higher intercalation of clay platelets with
28% VA. The effect of addition of clay on the development and the modification of crystalline morphology in EVA matrix was also studied
using WAXS and temperature-modulated differential scanning calorimetry (MDSC). Results are presented showing that the addition of clay
platelets does not increase the matrix crystallinity but the morphology was significantly modified such that there was an increase in the ‘rigid’
amorphous phase. Mechanical properties were also evaluated against the respective morphological information for each specimen and there
are indications that the level of clay–polymer interaction plays a significant role in such morphological modification, and in such a way that
affects the final PCN mechanical properties which has wide and significant applications in the packaging industries.
© 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: EVA; Nanocomposites; Mechanical; Morphology; MDSC
1. Introduction
The combination of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) with
nanoclay has wide commercial applications (such as packag-
ing films, cables and adhesives), and these applications de-
pend on the vinyl acetate (VA) contained in the main chain. As
the VA content increases, the copolymer presents increasing
polarity but lower crystallinity, and therefore different me-
chanical behavior [1]. The increasing polarity with increasing
VA content is apparently useful in imparting a high degree
of polymer–clay surface interaction, and it has been reported
that there is a significant rise in the Young’s modulus and the
yield strength of the EVA PCNs [2], in tune with the behavior
of other polymeric nanocomposites [3].
∗
Corresponding author. Tel.: +61 3 992552086; fax: +61 3 99252268.
E-mail addresses: deeptangshu@hotmail.com (D.S. Chaudhary),
sati.bhattacharya@rmit.edu.au (S.N. Bhattacharya).
This study is aimed at producing EVA nanocomposites us-
ing matrices with various VA content and clay concentrations,
and analyzing them for their respective clay–polymer inter-
action and their influence on the phase modification (matrix
crystallinity) and mechanical properties. Since the VA con-
tent dictates the polarity of the matrix – thus dictating the
level of organoclay–polymer interaction – morphologies of
EVA nanocomposites would differ based on VA content and
their interaction with its nanoclay content. For example, some
authors have reported how the structure–mobility properties
of EVA polymer are influenced by the VA content [4] and this
chain mobility in and around clay galleries could significantly
modify the level of interaction in clay nanocomposites. Also,
it is well known that inclusion of filler provides a suitable
pathway for increased crystallinity and consequently higher
crystallization temperatures in polymeric samples because
of the nucleation effects of the fillers (by providing active
surface structures) [5]. However, presence of small quan-
0040-6031/$ – see front matter © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.tca.2005.02.031