Prenatal detection of an inverted duplication deletion in the
long arm of chromosome 1 in a fetus with increased nuchal
translucency. Molecular cytogenetic analysis and review of
the literature
Emmanouil Manolakos
a,j
, Stavros Sifakis
f
, Sotirios Sotiriou
g
,
Panagiotis Peitsidis
b
, Makarios Eleftheriades
c
, Vassilis Mersinias
a
,
Thomas Liehr
i
, Loretta Thomaidis
d
, George Kitsos
e
, Ioannis Papoulidis
a
,
Michael B. Petersen
h
and Sandro Orru
j
Clinical Dysmorphology 2012, 21:101–105
a
Laboratory of Cytogenetics Eurogenetica,
b
Department of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology ‘Helena Venizelou’ Hospital,
c
EmbryoCare, Fetal Medicine Centre,
d
Department of Pediatrics, University of Athens, ‘Aglaia Kyriakou’ Children’s
Hospital,
e
Department of Opthalmology, Ioannina University Hospital,
f
Depart-
ment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete,
g
Department of Embryology, University of Thessaly, Larissa,
h
Department of
Genetics Institute of Child Health, Aghia Sophia Hospital, Athens, Greece,
i
Institute of Human Genetics and Anthropology, Friedrich-Schiller-University,
Jena, Germany and
j
Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cagliari,
Binaghi Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
Correspondence to Dr Panagiotis Peitsidis, MD, PhD, Department of Obstetrics
and Gynaecology ‘Helena Venizelou’ Hospital, Proussis 22 p.c:17123, Athens,
Greece
Tel:+30 697 222 1553; fax: +30 210 74 74 908;
e-mail: panagiotis_pp@yahoo.com
Received 22 February 2011 Accepted 26 October 2011
List of key features
Hydrops fetalis
Increased nuchal translucency
Oligamnios
Introduction
Partial trisomy 1q syndrome is a rare chromosomal
aberration. Most cases arise from de-novo unbalanced
translocations or from pure partial duplications of
chromosome 1q, mostly involving the 1q31.2–q43 region
(Watson et al., 1990; Bartsch et al., 2001; Kı ´mya et al.,
2002; Nowaczyk et al., 2003; Machlitt et al., 2005; Utine
et al., 2007; Wax et al., 2008). On the basis of the
orientation of the duplicated segment, they can be
divided into direct and inverted duplications. Inverted
duplications are cytogenetic rearrangements due to
meiotic errors during homologous chromosome pairing
and are usually associated with the deletion of the
contiguous distal region (Bonaglia et al., 2000). Only four
postnatal cases have been described as inverted duplica-
tions 1q, two of which were associated with terminal
deletions (Mewar et al., 1994; De Brasi et al., 2001; Poli-
tyko et al., 2005; Balasubramanian et al., 2009). We report
the first prenatally diagnosed case of trisomy 1q31.2–q43
due to an inverted duplication of this region, associated
with a terminal deletion of the long arm of the rearranged
chromosome 1.
Clinical report
A 33-year-old female, gravida 1, was referred for further
prenatal diagnosis because of fetal ultrasound examina-
tion at 12 weeks of gestation that showed increased
nuchal translucency (NT) 5.8 mm (Fig. 1), with a
calculated Down syndrome risk of 1/43. The family
history was unremarkable.
Chromosome analysis was performed according to standard
procedures with Giemsa-banded chromosomes from cul-
tured chorionic villi (CVS), and fetal DNA was extracted
directly using the Instagene Matrix resin (Bio-Rad
Laboratories, Hercules, California, USA). A multiplex
quantitative fluorescent PCR (QF-PCR) analysis was
performed. The QF-PCR analysis was carried out using
10 ng fetal DNA extracted from CVS. The QF-PCR
products were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis on an
ABI 3130 automated (Applied Biosystems, Foster City,
California, USA) DNA sequencer. All short tandem repeat
markers for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, and X were observed
in a normal diallelic pattern. The cytogenetic analysis
showed a 46,XY,der(1) karyotype. Subsequent chromo-
some analysis of lymphocyte cultures of both parents was
performed and appeared normal. After genetic counseling,
the parents decided to terminate the pregnancy.
The CVS cultures were subjected to fluorescence in–situ
hybridization for further confirmation of the diagnosis. The
aberrant chromosome 1 was characterized by fluorescence
in-situ hybridization using multicolor banding for chromo-
some 1 (10 pcp), multicolor banding probes, as described
previously. The chromosomal rearrangement was molecular
cytogenetically unbalanced, as the subtelomere probe
(Abbott Vysis; Abbott Laboratories, Illinois, USA) was not
present in the 1qter (data not shown). The karyotype was
identified as 46,XY,der(1)(pter-q43::q43-q31.2:) (Fig. 2).
Genomic DNA samples were hybridized on Affymetrix
Cytogenetics Whole-Genome 2.7M arrays using the
Short case report 101
0962-8827 c 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins DOI: 10.1097/MCD.0b013e32834e9279
Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.