Corresponding author: Obumneme Onyeka Okwonna; ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8517-4541
Copyright © 2023 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article. This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0.
Catalyst deactivation and the effect of catalyst makeup on the FCC unit
Obumneme Onyeka Okwonna
1, 3, *
and Amalate Ann Obuebite
2, 3
1
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Port Harcourt, PMB 5323, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
2
Department of Petroleum Engineering, Niger Delta University, PMB 071, Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.
3
Africa Centre of Excellence for Oilfield Chemicals Research (ACE-CEFOR), University of Port Harcourt, PMB 5323, Port
Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 2023, 14(02), 061–079
Publication history: Received on 02 January 2023; revised on 12 February 2023; accepted on 14 February 2023
Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2023.14.2.0028
Abstract
One of the significant processes of the crude oil refining process is the fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit. This unit
produces olefins and other feedstock for the petrochemical industry as well as high octane gasoline, naphtha, light cycle
oil, and heavy cycle oil. Attrition is one of the forms of catalyst deactivation on FCC catalyst which affects its operation,
thereby giving rise to a high amount of catalyst makeup to compensate for the losses in this unit. This study investigated
the effect of catalyst attrition on a commercial FCC unit through an analysis of its technical data from 4-run operations.
The catalyst loss profile was evaluated while the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed abrasion as the dominant
attrition type in the unit, hence resulting in many catalyst particles being lost as micro fines through elutriation. A
simulation study was carried out using ASPEN HYSYS version 8.8 to assess the effects of reduction and increment of
fresh catalyst makeup on the product yield while a cost analysis was done to evaluate the economic implication. The
results showed that a 2% reduction of the current daily catalyst makeup gave the same yield as that of the reference
value. The products also had similar qualities showing that $117,000.00/annum could be saved by a 2% reduction of
the current catalyst makeup.
Keywords: FCC unit; Refinery; Simulation; Catalyst; Attrition
1. Introduction
Over the years, catalyst deactivation is one of the challenges of the fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) unit operation.
Deactivation in heterogeneous catalysts could be physical or chemical. Whereas chemical deactivation involves the
reaction of the catalytic phase of these catalysts with other compounds thereby leading to their destruction, physical
deactivation such as attrition involves the physical degradation of these catalysts (Cerqueira et al., 2008). Attrition is a
major concern in the FCC process and is responsible for most of the material and economic losses encountered in this
unit. It occurs as a result of catalyst particle motion and inter-particle collision arising from the gas flow and bed-to-wall
impact during the reaction process. As much as these collisions are necessary for the operation of fluidized-bed reactors,
the consequent attrition leading to the generation of fines which pass as dust and the loss of valuable materials is a
significant drawback in the operation of the FCC unit (Wu et al., 2016; Wei et al., 1977). These losses have both
operational and economic implications for the running of these units. This is because the loss of these catalyst particles
results in the need for addition of makeup catalyst to keep the system at a level required for optimum performance
(Kramp et al., 2011; Wether and Reppenhagen, 1999). Moreover, whereas increased coarseness of the fluid bed is
undesirable, a bed whose particle size distribution comprises of extremely fine particles might also not achieve the
desired result. Sources of attrition include activities inside the cyclone, particle motion and collisions in the fluid bed
(bubble phase) and grid jet (transport phase). Studies have also been carried out on attrition in these regions (Werther
and Hartge, 2003). Wei et al. (1977) attributed reasons for catalyst losses to the possible existence of catalyst attrition